C
Christopher Potts
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 156
Citations - 22930
Christopher Potts is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Semantics & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 45, co-authored 155 publications receiving 18342 citations. Previous affiliations of Christopher Potts include University of Massachusetts Amherst & University of California, Santa Cruz.
Papers
More filters
Proceedings Article
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Richard Socher,Alex Perelygin,Jean Y. Wu,Jason Chuang,Christopher D. Manning,Andrew Y. Ng,Christopher Potts +6 more
TL;DR: A Sentiment Treebank that includes fine grained sentiment labels for 215,154 phrases in the parse trees of 11,855 sentences and presents new challenges for sentiment compositionality, and introduces the Recursive Neural Tensor Network.
Proceedings Article
Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis
TL;DR: This work presents a model that uses a mix of unsupervised and supervised techniques to learn word vectors capturing semantic term--document information as well as rich sentiment content, and finds it out-performs several previously introduced methods for sentiment classification.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
TL;DR: The Stanford Natural Language Inference (SNLI) corpus as discussed by the authors is a large-scale collection of labeled sentence pairs, written by humans doing a novel grounded task based on image captioning.
Posted Content
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference
TL;DR: The Stanford Natural Language Inference corpus is introduced, a new, freely available collection of labeled sentence pairs, written by humans doing a novel grounded task based on image captioning, which allows a neural network-based model to perform competitively on natural language inference benchmarks for the first time.
Book
The logic of conventional implicatures
TL;DR: In this paper, a preliminary case for Conventional Implicatures and a logic for conventional implicatures are presented, together with a syntactic analysis of Grice's definition.