Clark McCauley

TL;DR: The Disgust Scale as mentioned in this paper is a measure of individual differences in disgust sensitivity and includes two true-false and two disgust-rating items for each of seven domains of disgust elicitors (food, animals, body products, sex, body envelope violations, death, and hygiene) and for a domain of magical thinking (via similarity and contagion) that cuts across the 7 domains of elicitors.

TL;DR: The authors found evidence that most people see their work as either a job (focus on financial rewards and necessity rather than pleasure or fulfillment; not a major positive part of life), a career, or a calling, while enjoying the enjoyment of fulfilling, socially useful work.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors conceptualized political radicalization as a dimension of increasing extremity of beliefs, feelings, and behaviors in support of intergroup conflict and violence, and distinguished twelve mechanisms of radicalization across individuals, groups, and mass publics.

TL;DR: In this paper, a cross-cultural analysis of disgust and its elicitors using Israeli, Japanese, Greek and Hopi notions of disgust were undertaken. And it was noted that disgust elicitors have expanded from food to the social order and have been found in many cultures.

TL;DR: In this paper, the participants experienced 32 hands-on tasks designed to provide a behavioral validation for the paper-and-pencil Disgust Scale, which the students had completed 2 months before.