C
Constantine Gatsonis
Researcher at Brown University
Publications - 261
Citations - 54282
Constantine Gatsonis is an academic researcher from Brown University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Breast cancer & Cancer. The author has an hindex of 94, co-authored 245 publications receiving 47918 citations. Previous affiliations of Constantine Gatsonis include Rutgers University & University of Michigan.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.
Denise R. Aberle,Amanda M. Adams,Christine D. Berg,William C. Black,Jonathan D. Clapp,Richard M. Fagerstrom,Ilana F. Gareen,Constantine Gatsonis,Pamela M. Marcus,JoRean D. Sicks +9 more
TL;DR: Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer, as compared with the radiography group, and the rate of death from any cause was reduced.
Journal ArticleDOI
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Johannes B. Reitsma,David E. Bruns,Constantine Gatsonis,Paul Glasziou,Les Irwig,Jeroen G. Lijmer,David Moher,Drummond Rennie,Henrica C.W. de Vet +9 more
TL;DR: If medical journals adopt the STARD checklist and flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.
Journal ArticleDOI
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Johannes B. Reitsma,David E. Bruns,Constantine Gatsonis,Paul Glasziou,Les Irwig,Jeroen G. Lijmer,David Moher,David Moher,Drummond Rennie,Henrica C.W. de Vet,Herbert Y. Kressel,Nader Rifai,Robert M. Golub,Douglas G. Altman,Lotty Hooft,Daniël A. Korevaar,Jérémie F. Cohen,Jérémie F. Cohen +18 more
TL;DR: STARD 2015 is presented, an updated list of 30 essential items that should be included in every report of a diagnostic accuracy study, which incorporates recent evidence about sources of bias and variability in diagnostic accuracy.
Journal ArticleDOI
Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening
Etta D. Pisano,Constantine Gatsonis,Edward Hendrick,Martin J. Yaffe,Janet K. Baum,Suddhasatta Acharyya,Emily F. Conant,Laurie L. Fajardo,Lawrence W. Bassett,Roberta A. Jong,Murray Rebner +10 more
TL;DR: The overall diagnostic accuracy of digital and film mammography as a means of screening for breast cancer is similar, but digital mammography is more accurate in women under the age of 50 years, women with radiographically dense breasts, and premenopausal or perimenopausal women.
Journal ArticleDOI
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies The PRISMA-DTA Statement
Matthew D. F. McInnes,David Moher,Brett D. Thombs,Brett D. Thombs,Trevor A. McGrath,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Tammy Clifford,Jérémie F. Cohen,Jonathan J Deeks,Constantine Gatsonis,Lotty Hooft,Harriet Hunt,Chris Hyde,Daniël A. Korevaar,Mariska M.G. Leeflang,Petra Macaskill,Johannes B. Reitsma,Rachel Rodin,Anne W S Rutjes,Jean-Paul Salameh,Adrienne Stevens,Adrienne Stevens,Yemisi Takwoingi,Marcello Tonelli,Laura Weeks,Penny Whiting,Brian H Willis +26 more
TL;DR: A group of 24 multidisciplinary experts used a systematic review of articles on existing reporting guidelines and methods, a 3-round Delphi process, a consensus meeting, pilot testing, and iterative refinement to develop the PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy guideline.