The paper examines the nature, rationale, and logic of the reforms to EU Cohesion Policy. A particular focus of the paper is on the concept of smart specialization and the use of this concept to help facilitate a results-oriented policy agenda. On the one hand, the arguments underpinning the reforms in part relate to modern thinking regarding the role of industrial policy. On the other hand, they also partly relate to advances in our understanding of the relationships between economic geography, technology, and institutions. At the same time, the specific features of the EU context also heavily influence the nature and logic of the changes, whereby legal and institutional matters linking Cohesion Policy to other EU policies all play an important role.

Transforming European regional policy: a results-driven agenda and smart specialization

Effects of EU Regional Policy: 1989-2013

The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions. Regional Studies. This paper presents an evaluation exercise on the impact of European Cohesion Policy on the economic performance of the most disadvantaged European areas (Objective 1 regions) for the programming period 2000–06. By performing the analysis at NUTS-3 rather than NUTS-2 level to exploit the exogeneity of the treatment status in the context of a regression discontinuity design (RDD), the analysis shows that European Cohesion funds have positively contributed to generating economic growth in lagging areas. However, their effect is mainly driven by the successful performance of rural areas close to the main urban agglomerates. Favourable geography and the progressive suburbanization of the rural landscape created new opportunities for rural areas close to cities, thus boosting the effect of the policy.

/pdf/the-impact-of-european-cohesion-policy-in-urban-and-rural-2zhqsr3azr.pdf

The impact of European Cohesion Policy in urban and rural regions

This paper assesses whether both the levels and the degree of change in government quality influence regional economic performance in the European Union and, in particular, in its lagging regions. ...

/pdf/institutional-change-and-the-development-of-lagging-regions-1vy9s6s5r9.pdf

Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe

Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union Structural Funds on regional growth. Regional Studies. This paper offers a meta-regression analysis of the controversial impact of European Union Structural Funds on the growth of the recipient regions. It identifies the factors that explain the heterogeneity in the size of 323 estimates of their impact recorded in 17 econometric studies. Heterogeneity comes from the publication status, the period examined, the control of endogeneity and the presence of several regressors, but not from differences in functional forms.

Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union Structural Funds on regional growth

Given the increasing share of the EU budget devoted to Regional Policy, several studies have tried to identify the impact of structural funds on economic growth. However, so far no consensus has been reached. We assess Regional Policy effects through a non-experimental comparison group method, the regression discontinuity design, and a novel regional dataset for the 1994–2006 period. We exploit the allocation rule of EU transfers by comparing regions with a per capita GDP level just below the eligibility threshold (75% of EU average) with those just above. Our findings show a positive impact of EU Regional Policy on economic growth.

Measuring the effects of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach

Traditionally, the effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy has been evaluated in terms of GDP growth rate. In this paper, we consider the effect of the regional policy in terms of its impacts on two specific fields of intervention, namely ‘research, technological development and innovation’, and ‘transport infrastructure’. Our econometric approach involves the use of a non-parametric regression discontinuity design technique to a uniquely-disaggregated Cohesion Policy dataset broken down according to the specific objectives of each stream of funding. The analysis considers different time intervals and sub-samples. Our results demonstrate a positive impact of Cohesion Policy interventions in these two specific fields of intervention.

/pdf/assessing-the-impacts-of-cohesion-policy-on-eu-regions-a-non-2id31ljpnp.pdf

Assessing the impacts of Cohesion Policy on EU regions: A non-parametric analysis on interventions promoting research and innovation and transport accessibility*

Given the increasing share of the EU budget devoted to Regional Policy, several studies have tried to identify the policy’s contribution to regional economic growth. However, so far no consensus has been reached on the effectiveness of Cohesion policy, due to both limitations in data availability and comparability at regional level, and the difficulties in isolating the effects of the policy from the confounding effect of other factors. The purpose of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of UE Regional Policy, using a counterfactual method - the regression discontinuity design (henceforth RDD) . We exploit the allocation rule of regional UE transfer: regions with a per capita GDP level below 75% of the EU average receive a huge amount of UE structural funds transfers. The sharp RDD is based to the jump in the probability of EU transfer receipt at the 75% cut-off point. Comparing the economic scenario arising under policy interventions with a ‘counterfactual’ situation - what would have happened if the policies were not implemented - we identify the economic effect of European regional interventions and show that they are positive and statistically significant. The most part of the larger growth of Obj. 1 regions in the period 1995-2006 can be attributed to Regional Policy.

Measuring the Impact of the European Regional Policy on Economic Growth

Given the increasing share of the EU budget devoted to Regional Policy, several studies have tried to identify the policys contribution to regional economic growth. However, so far no consensus has been reached on the effectiveness of Cohesion policy, due to both limitations in data availability and comparability at regional level, and the difficulties in isolating the effects of the policy from the confounding effect of other factors. The purpose of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of UE Regional Policy, using a counterfactual method - the regression discontinuity design (henceforth RDD). We exploit the allocation rule of regional UE transfer: regions with a per capita GDP level below 75% of the EU average receive a huge amount of UE structural funds transfers. The sharp RDD is based to the jump in the probability of EU transfer receipt at the 75% cut-off point. Comparing the economic scenario arising under policy interventions with a counterfactual situation - what would have happened if the policies were not implemented - we identify the economic effect of European regional interventions and show that they are positive and statistically significant. The most part of the larger growth of Obj. 1 regions in the period 1995-2006 can be attributed to Regional Policy.

/pdf/measuring-the-impact-of-the-european-regional-policy-on-1klz2k1zm2.pdf

Flavia Terribile

Papers

Measuring the effects of European Regional Policy on economic growth: A regression discontinuity approach

Assessing the impacts of Cohesion Policy on EU regions: A non-parametric analysis on interventions promoting research and innovation and transport accessibility*

Measuring the Impact of the European Regional Policy on Economic Growth

Measuring the Impact of the European Regional Policy on Economic Growth: a Regression Discontinuity Design Approach