scispace - formally typeset
G

Gary Klein

Researcher at Klein Associates

Publications -  176
Citations -  22373

Gary Klein is an academic researcher from Klein Associates. The author has contributed to research in topics: Naturalistic decision-making & Decision engineering. The author has an hindex of 50, co-authored 173 publications receiving 20789 citations.

Papers
More filters
Book

Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions

Gary Klein
TL;DR: In this paper, the Vincennes shootdown mental simulation and decision-making was used to study the strengths used in making difficult decisions in a firehouse environment, including the power to spot leverage points nonlinear aspects of problem solving, the power of stories, metaphors and analogues, read minds, and rational analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Naturalistic Decision Making

TL;DR: The origins and contributions of the naturalistic decision making research approach, which has been used to improve performance through revisions of military doctrine, training that is focused on decision requirements, and the development of information technologies to support decision making and related cognitive functions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree.

TL;DR: Evaluating the likely quality of an intuitive judgment requires an assessment of the predictability of the environment in which the judgment is made and of the individual's opportunity to learn the regularities of that environment.
Book

Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods

Gary Klein
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present and elaborate on past models developed to explain this type of decision making and present a new perspective of naturalistic decision making, which they argue is unproductive since it is so heavily grounded in economics and mathematics.

A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making.

Gary Klein
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a recognitional model of decision making that shows how people can use experience to avoid some of the limitations of analytical strategies, and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of recognitional and analytical decision strategies.