scispace - formally typeset
G

Guido Sonnemann

Researcher at University of Bordeaux

Publications -  177
Citations -  6271

Guido Sonnemann is an academic researcher from University of Bordeaux. The author has contributed to research in topics: Life-cycle assessment & Sustainability. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 161 publications receiving 4814 citations. Previous affiliations of Guido Sonnemann include United Nations Environment Programme & Rovira i Virgili University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA

TL;DR: In this paper, a review brings together research on life cycle assessment (LCA) applied within the building sector, focusing on the LCA methodology and tools employed in the built environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates

TL;DR: The recycling of metals is widely viewed as a fruitful sustainability strategy, but little information is available on the degree to which recycling is actually taking place as discussed by the authors, which is a concern.
Book

Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (TALSA), which is an overview of the current and emerging life cycle assessment techniques and their use in the context of sustainable consumption and production.
Journal ArticleDOI

Uncertainty assessment by a Monte Carlo simulation in a life cycle inventory of electricity produced by a waste incinerator

TL;DR: In this paper, the uncertainties in the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) of a life cycle study on waste incineration in Tarragona/Spain has been analyzed and the procedure applied consists of selection of essential parameters, determination of probability distributions, Monte Carlo simulation, significance analysis and interpretation of the results.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment.

TL;DR: There are serious conceptual shortcomings in the way models are constructed, with scale considerations largely absent, and there is a disproportionate focus on indicators that reflect changes in compositional aspects of biodiversity, mainly changes in species richness.