scispace - formally typeset
H

Heinz Wimmer

Researcher at University of Salzburg

Publications -  102
Citations -  19814

Heinz Wimmer is an academic researcher from University of Salzburg. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dyslexia & Reading (process). The author has an hindex of 54, co-authored 102 publications receiving 18853 citations. Previous affiliations of Heinz Wimmer include Max Planck Society.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception.

TL;DR: A travelling salesman found himself spending the night at home with his wife when one of his trips was unexpectedly cancelled, and he leapt out from the bed, ran across the room and jumped out the window.
Journal ArticleDOI

Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit

TL;DR: This paper showed that false-belief attribution is difficult for younger 3-year-olds despite their retention of essential facts and despite attempts to make expectations more explicit and prevent pragmatic misinterpretation.
Journal ArticleDOI

“John thinks that Mary thinks that…” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children ☆

TL;DR: The authors assessed the understanding of second-order belief structures by 5-and 10-year-old children in acted stories in which two characters (John and Mary) were independently informed about an object's (ice-cream van's) unexpected transfer to a new location.
Journal ArticleDOI

Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system

TL;DR: This article found that dyslexic children suffered from a pervasive speed deficit for all types of reading tasks, including text, high frequency words, and pseudowords, but at the same time showed generally rather high reading accuracy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up.

TL;DR: In a longitudinal study, development of word reading fluency and spelling were followed for almost 8 years as discussed by the authors, and the strongest specific predictors were rapid automatized naming for reading fluencies and phonological awareness for spelling.