Although there has been considerable progress in reducing cancer incidence in the United States, the number of cancer survivors continues to increase due to the aging and growth of the population and improvements in survival rates. As a result, it is increasingly important to understand the unique medical and psychosocial needs of survivors and be aware of resources that can assist patients, caregivers, and health care providers in navigating the various phases of cancer survivorship. To highlight the challenges and opportunities to serve these survivors, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute estimated the prevalence of cancer survivors on January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2022, by cancer site. Data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries were used to describe median age and stage at diagnosis and survival; data from the National Cancer Data Base and the SEER-Medicare Database were used to describe patterns of cancer treatment. An estimated 13.7 million Americans with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2012, and by January 1, 2022, that number will increase to nearly 18 million. The 3 most prevalent cancers among males are prostate (43%), colorectal (9%), and melanoma of the skin (7%), and those among females are breast (41%), uterine corpus (8%), and colorectal (8%). This article summarizes common cancer treatments, survival rates, and posttreatment concerns and introduces the new National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center, which has engaged more than 100 volunteer survivorship experts nationwide to develop tools for cancer survivors, caregivers, health care professionals, advocates, and policy makers.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.3322/caac.21149

Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012

ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines

This document is the report of a task group of the AAPM and has been prepared primarily to advise medical physicists involved in the external-beam radiation therapy of patients with thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic tumors affected by respiratory motion. This report describes the magnitude of respiratory motion, discusses radiotherapy specific problems caused by respiratory motion, explains techniques that explicitly manage respiratory motion during radiotherapy and gives recommendations in the application of these techniques for patient care, including quality assurance (QA) guidelines for these devices and their use with conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy. The technologies covered by this report are motion-encompassing methods, respiratory gated techniques, breath-hold techniques, forced shallow-breathing methods, and respiration-synchronized techniques. The main outcome of this report is a clinical process guide for managing respiratory motion. Included in this guide is the recommendation that tumor motion should be measured (when possible) for each patient for whom respiratory motion is a concern. If target motion is greater than 5 mm, a method of respiratory motion management is available, and if the patient can tolerate the procedure, respiratory motion management technology is appropriate. Respiratory motion management is also appropriate when the procedure will increase normal tissue sparing. Respiratory motion management involves further resources, education and the development of and adherence to QA procedures.

/pdf/the-management-of-respiratory-motion-in-radiation-oncology-3m6tr6pexi.pdf

The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76.

The abscopal effect is a phenomenon in which local radiotherapy is associated with the regression of metastatic cancer at a distance from the irradiated site. The abscopal effect may be mediated by activation of the immune system. Ipilimumab is a mono‑ clonal antibody that inhibits an immunologic checkpoint on T cells, cytotoxic T‑lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA ‑ 4). We report a case of the abscopal effect in a patient with melanoma treated with ipilimumab and radiotherapy. Temporal associations were noted: tumor shrinkage with antibody responses to the cancer– testis antigen NY‑ ESO‑ 1, changes in peripheral‑ blood immune cells, and increases in antibody responses to other antigens after radiotherapy. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.)

/pdf/immunologic-correlates-of-the-abscopal-effect-in-a-patient-5aefh9xe4h.pdf

Immunologic Correlates of the Abscopal Effect in a Patient with Melanoma

A stereotactic body frame with a fixation device has been developed for stereotactic radiation therapy of extracranial targets, a precision localization and positioning system in analogy with the stereotactic head frames used for intracranial targets. Results of the first 42 treated tumors in 31 patients are presented. Most of the patients had solitary tumors in liver, lung or retroperitoneal space. Clinical target volumes ranged from 2 to 622 cm3 (mean 78 cm3) and minimum doses to the planning target volumes (PTV) of 7.7-30 Gy/fraction (mean 14.2 Gy) were given on 1-4 occasions to a total minimum dose to the PTVs of 7.7-45 Gy (mean 30.2 Gy) to the periphery of the PTV and total mean doses to the PTVs of 8-66 Gy (mean 41 Gy). The central part of the tumor was usually given about 50% higher dose compared to that of the periphery of the PTV by a planned inhomogeneous dose distribution. Some of the patients received stereotactic radiation therapy concomitantly to more than one target, in others new metastases were also treated which appeared during the follow-up period. We observed a local rate of no progressive disease of 80% during a follow-up period of 1.5-38 months. Fifty percent of the tumors decreased in size or disappeared.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/02841869509127197

Stereotactic High Dose Fraction Radiation Therapy of Extracranial Tumors Using An Accelerator: Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients

Purpose The impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on 3-year progression-free survival of medically inoperable patients with stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was analyzed in a prospective phase II study. Patients and Methods Fifty-seven patients with T1NOMO (70%) and T2N0M0 (30%) were included between August 2003 and September 2005 at seven different centers in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark and observed up to 36 months. SBRT was delivered with 15 Gy times three at the 67% isodose of the planning target volume. Results Progression-free survival at 3 years was 52%. Overall- and cancer-specific survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 86%, 65%, 60%, and 93%, 88%, 88%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with T1 or T2 tumors. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 4 to 47 months), 27 patients (47%) were deceased, seven as a result of lung cancer and 20 as a result of concurrent disease. Kaplan-Meier estimated local control at 3 years was 9...

https://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5681

Outcome in a Prospective Phase II Trial of Medically Inoperable Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

A method for sterotactic high-dose radiotherapy of malignancies in the abdomen has been developed. A stereotactic frame for the body has been developed and a method for fixation of the patient in the frame is described. The reproducibility in the stereotactic system of tumours in the liver and the lung was found to be within 5-8mm for 90% of the patient set-ups. The diaphragmatic movements were reduced to 5-10 mm, by applying a pressure on the abdomen. An analytical method is used to calculate dose distributions for a continuum of beams in an isocentric treatment technique. The advantage of a heterogeneous target dose is demonstrated and proposed for the present application. A non-coplanar treatment technique, using eight individually shaped beams is proposed and has been used for patient treatments. The dose distribution for a patient with a metastasis in the liver is shown as well as dose volume histograms for the target and the liver. At the Karolinska Hospital non-malignant and primary malignant intracranial targets have been treated with radiosurgery using the ‘gamma knife’ since 1974. During recent years brain metastases have also been treated in several hundreds of patients. The treatment is given as a single irradiation of the target without any margin to the extension seen on CT. A prerequisite for this method is the sterotactic system used for localization and for patient set-up. The rigid connection between the stereotactic frame and the head is obtained by screws from the frame to the skull. The experience of tissue tolerance to localized single fraction high-dose radiotherapy stems from the early application of radiation therapy and more recently from radiosurgery for intracranial targets and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for extracranial targets. In radiosurgery the target volume is generally in the order of from a few

https://informahealthcare.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/02841869409121782

Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Malignancies in the Abdomen: Methodological aspects

One concern with adjuvant radiation therapy for early breast cancer is the potential risk of increasing intercurrent mortality due to radiation-induced damage of the myocardium. The paper presents an analysis of long-term survival among 960 patients with primary breast cancer included in a randomized trial of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (45 Gy/5 weeks) versus surgery alone. All patients were treated with a modified radical mastectomy. The mean follow-up was 16 years (range: 13–19 years). During the entire follow-up period there was an overall survival difference in favor of the irradiated patients that was of borderline significance (p = 0.09). There was no increase in intercurrent mortality due to any cause. However, when the results were analyzed according to estimated doses of radiation to the myocardium, the subset of patients who received the highest doses, that is, those treated with tangential 60Co fields for left-sided tumors, were found to have a significantly increased risk of death due to ischemic heart disease compared to the surgical controls (relative hazard: 3.2, p < 0.05). No such increase was observed among the patients who received less radiation to the myocardium, that is, whose chest wall and internal mammary nodes were treated with electrons or those with right-sided tumors, irrespective of the treatment technique. It is concluded that cardiovascular mortality associated with radiation therapy for early breast cancer is correlated with the biological dose of radiation to the heart and the irradiated volume. All of the following factors are thus important: laterality of the tumor, portal arrangements, radiation energy, fractionation, and total dose. The study illustrates that an increased cardiovascular mortality can be avoided by the use of appropriate techniques and avoidance of excessive treatment.

Ingmar Lax

Papers

Stereotactic High Dose Fraction Radiation Therapy of Extracranial Tumors Using An Accelerator: Clinical experience of the first thirty-one patients

Outcome in a Prospective Phase II Trial of Medically Inoperable Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Malignancies in the Abdomen: Methodological aspects

Cardiovascular mortality in a randomized trial of adjuvant radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer.

The role of radiotherapy in treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer