Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Population structure is the result of both present processes and past history. Molecular markers are proving of great value in describing the former, and it is important to similarly determine the latter in order to understand their respective contributions. The study of palaeo-climates has also advanced significantly, and in particular that of the Pleistocene ice ages, which modified species ranges considerably. The last ice age and rapid post-glacial colonization of Europe is summarized. Possible population genetic consequences of expansion northward from southern refugia, and those of remaining in these mountainous regions are discussed. A series of recent case studies are detailed where DNA sequence information has been used to describe species genetic variation and subdivision across Europe. These include a grasshopper, the hedgehog, oak trees, the common beech, the black alder, the brown bear, newts, shrews, water vole, silver fir and house mice. These molecular data confirm southern peninsulas of Europe as major ice age refugia, and in most cases demonstrate that genetically distinct taxa emerged from them. They can thus define genomic differences and so greatly augment previous fossil data. The refugial genomes contributed differently in various species to the re-colonization of Europe, with three broad patterns described as paradigms—«grasshopper», «hedgehog» and «bear». These different expansion patterns produced clusters of hybrid zones where they made contact, and it is argued that many species genomes may be further cryptically subdivided. A reduction in diversity from southern to northern Europe in the extent of allelic variation and species subdivision is seen; this is attributed to rapid expansion northward and the varied topography of southern refugia allowing populations to diverge through several ice ages. The differences in DNA sequence indicate that some species have been diverging in refugial regions for a few ice ages at most, whilst distinct lineages in other species suggest much more ancient separation.

https://www.fc.up.pt/mestr_biodiv/aulas/hewitt_1999.pdf

Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota

Since the Age of Exploration began, there has been a drastic breaching of biogeographic barriers that previously had isolated the continental biotas for millions of years. We explore the nature of these recent biotic exchanges and their consequences on evolutionary processes. The direct evidence of evolutionary consequences of the biotic rearrangements is of variable quality, but the results of trajectories are becoming clear as the number of studies increases. There are examples of invasive species altering the evolutionary pathway of native species by competitive exclusion, niche displacement, hybridization, introgression, predation, and ultimately extinction. Invaders themselves evolve in response to their interactions with natives, as well as in response to the new abiotic environment. Flexibility in behavior, and mutualistic interactions, can aid in the success of invaders in their new environment.

/pdf/the-evolutionary-impact-of-invasive-species-3jya0wftzs.pdf

The evolutionary impact of invasive species.

Predicting which species will occur together in the future, and where, remains one of the greatest challenges in ecology, and requires a sound understanding of how the abiotic and biotic environments interact with dispersal processes and history across scales. Biotic interactions and their dynamics influence species' relationships to climate, and this also has important implications for predicting future distributions of species. It is already well accepted that biotic interactions shape species' spatial distributions at local spatial extents, but the role of these interactions beyond local extents (e.g. 10 km2 to global extents) are usually dismissed as unimportant. In this review we consolidate evidence for how biotic interactions shape species distributions beyond local extents and review methods for integrating biotic interactions into species distribution modelling tools. Drawing upon evidence from contemporary and palaeoecological studies of individual species ranges, functional groups, and species richness patterns, we show that biotic interactions have clearly left their mark on species distributions and realised assemblages of species across all spatial extents. We demonstrate this with examples from within and across trophic groups. A range of species distribution modelling tools is available to quantify species environmental relationships and predict species occurrence, such as: (i) integrating pairwise dependencies, (ii) using integrative predictors, and (iii) hybridising species distribution models (SDMs) with dynamic models. These methods have typically only been applied to interacting pairs of species at a single time, require a priori ecological knowledge about which species interact, and due to data paucity must assume that biotic interactions are constant in space and time. To better inform the future development of these models across spatial scales, we call for accelerated collection of spatially and temporally explicit species data. Ideally, these data should be sampled to reflect variation in the underlying environment across large spatial extents, and at fine spatial resolution. Simplified ecosystems where there are relatively few interacting species and sometimes a wealth of existing ecosystem monitoring data (e.g. arctic, alpine or island habitats) offer settings where the development of modelling tools that account for biotic interactions may be less difficult than elsewhere.

/pdf/the-role-of-biotic-interactions-in-shaping-distributions-and-e49xst0zpo.pdf

The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling

Sibling species are common in all major marine groups and habitats. Their abundance reflects both inadequate study of morphological features of living organisms ("pseudo-sibling species") and divergence in habitat, life history, and chemical recognition systems without parallel divergence in morphology. Many marine sibling species are quite distinct genetically. Others, however, exhibit slight genetic differences whose significance is only clear in sympatry and in combination with other subtle but concordant patterns of differentiation. A large number of abundant, well-studied, or economically important taxa have recently been shown to be complexes of sibling species. The broad habitat and geographic distributions characteristic of many marine species require reevaluation in this context.

Sibling species in the sea

In the light of available paleontological, genetic, and ecological data, we attempt to reconstruct the natural history of the house mouse (Mus musculus) and to justify a systematics. The house mouse is the most recent phylogenetic offshoot of the genus Mus. Its present components result from a radiation that took place most probably in the north of the Indian subcontinent about 0.5 MYA. The different colonization paths into the rest of Eurasia led to the present day subspecies: M. m. domesticus in western Europe and the Mediterranean basin, M. m. musculus from central Europe to northern China, and M. m. castaneus in southeast Asia. The central populations remain very polymorphic and are not attributable to any of these subspecies; the status of M. m. bactrianus is unclear. This radiation led to a mosaic evolution of the different parts of the genome in these subspecies. The expansion to the periphery of the Eurasian range, and more recently to the rest of the world, is related to human activity. In the case of M. m. domesticus commensalism apparently started with human sedentism in the Fertile Crescent, but its extension to the western Meditteranean basin occurred only after Neolithic times. The recent expansion has produced zones of secondary contact at the perip hery of the cont inent. For instance, in Europe M. m. domesticus and M. m. musculus have formed a narrow hybrid zone where selection prevents the introgression of sex chromosomes. M. m. musculus and M. m. castaneus have

The evolution of house mice

Thirteen biochemical groups of wild mice from Europe, Asia, and Africa belonging to the genus Mus are analyzed at 22–42 protein loci. Phylogenetic trees are proposed and patterns of biochemical evolution are discussed, as well as the possible contribution of wild mice to the genetic diversity of laboratory stocks.

Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus.

Madeira is a small volcanic island in the Atlantic Ocean with steep mountains separating narrow valleys that are the only areas habitable by humans and their commensals. Here we show that house mice (Mus musculus domesticus ) on Madeira have an unexpected chromosomal diversity, the evolution of which is independent of adaptive processes, relying instead on geographic isolation and genetic drift.

Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice

A palaeontological and archaeozoological survey has allowed us to establish the different steps in the colonization of western Eurasia and northern Africa by the house mouse Mus musculus. After successive immigration waves of the genus Mus into this zone from the late Pliocene to the upper Pleistocene, the house mouse appeared and remained confined to the easternmost Mediterranean Basin at the uppermost Pleistocene. The first progression of this species into the Mediterranean Basin occurred in the Middle East from the Epipaleolithic to the Neolithic. Subsequently, this species was found in the western Mediterranean Basin during the Bronze Age and in north-west Europe during the Iron Age. In comparison to this latter zone, north central Europe was colonized relatively early, from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age which may, in fact, not only correspond to a much earlier invasion of Europe by M. musculus musculus but also suggest that the distribution of this subspecies extended much further west than it does nowadays, at a time when M. musculus domesticus was restricted to the Mediterranean zone. This archaeological survey is in agreement with genetic data which provide indications as to the speed, steps and pathways of progression of house mouse populations in western Eurasia.

The house mouse progression in Eurasia : a palaeontological and archaeozoological approach

We assessed the fertility (reproductive success, litter size, testis weight, spermatocyte-to-spermatid ratio) of F 1 s and backcrosses between different wild-derived outbred and inbred strains of two mouse subspecies, Mus musculus domesticus and M. m. musculus. A significant proportion of the F 1 females between the outbred crosses did not reproduce, suggesting that female infertility was present. As the spermatocyte-to-spermatid ratio was correlated with testis weight, the latter was used to attribute a sterile vs. fertile phenotype to all males. Segregation proportions in the backcrosses of F 1 females yielded 11 (inbred) to 17% (outbred) sterile males, suggesting the contribution of two to three major genetic factors to hybrid male sterility. Only one direction of cross between the inbred strains produced sterile F 1 males, indicating that one factor was borne by the musculus X-chromosome. No such differences were observed between reciprocal crosses in the outbred strains. The involvement of the X chromosome in male sterility thus could not be assessed, but its contribution appears likely given the limited introgression of X-linked markers through the hybrid zone between the subspecies. However, we observed no sterile phenotypes in wild males from the hybrid zone, although testis weight tended to decrease in the centre of the transect.

https://biogeosciences.u-bourgogne.fr/documents/articles_pdf/2005_Britton-Davidian_BiolJLinnSoc.pdf

Janice Britton-Davidian

Papers

The evolution of house mice

Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus.

Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice

The house mouse progression in Eurasia : a palaeontological and archaeozoological approach

Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory-bred hybrids