scispace - formally typeset
J

Jocelyn H. Bolin

Researcher at Ball State University

Publications -  12
Citations -  912

Jocelyn H. Bolin is an academic researcher from Ball State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Basketball. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 10 publications receiving 587 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Hayes, Andrew F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press

TL;DR: Hayes as discussed by the authors presents a journey through regression-based approaches for mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, which is a method for combining mediation and moderation into one singular analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Applications of cluster analysis to the creation of perfectionism profiles: a comparison of two clustering approaches.

TL;DR: Fuzzy clustering is introduced to audiences who are currently relatively unfamiliar with the technique to demonstrate the advantages associated with this method and to reveal that different cluster solutions are found by the two methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dimensions of Perfectionism Mediate the Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Coping

TL;DR: Stoeber et al. as discussed by the authors examined the relationship among parenting, perfectionism, and coping and to determine if perfectionism serves as a mediator between parenting and coping, and found that individuals with high personal standards reported the use of active coping (i.e., trying to deal with the stressor or reduce its impact).
Journal ArticleDOI

Making our Measures Match Perceptions: Do Severity and Type Matter When Assessing Academic Misconduct Offenses?

TL;DR: In this article, a study based on a combined sample of business students showed that students are more likely to commit minor cheating offenses and engage in panic-based cheating as compared to serious and planned cheating offenses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Group membership prediction when known groups consist of unknown subgroups: a Monte Carlo comparison of methods.

TL;DR: Results of the study indicated that CART and mixture discriminant analysis were the most effective tools for situations in which known groups were not homogeneous, whereas LDA, LR, and GAM had the highest rates of misclassification.