scispace - formally typeset
M

Mark Reed

Researcher at Scotland's Rural College

Publications -  235
Citations -  21247

Mark Reed is an academic researcher from Scotland's Rural College. The author has contributed to research in topics: Ecosystem services & Stakeholder. The author has an hindex of 60, co-authored 219 publications receiving 18334 citations. Previous affiliations of Mark Reed include Birmingham City University & University of Aberdeen.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a review of the development of participatory approaches in different disciplinary and geographical contexts, and reviews typologies that can be used to categorise and select participatory methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.

TL;DR: This paper asks how and why stakeholder analysis should be conducted for participatory natural resource management research, and proposes new tools and combinations of methods that can more effectively identify and categorise stakeholders and help understand their inter-relationships.
Journal ArticleDOI

What is social learning

TL;DR: Social learning is increasingly becoming a normative goal in natural resource management and policy, but there remains little consensus over its meaning or theoretical basis as discussed by the authors. This lack of conceptual clarity has limited our capacity to assess whether social learning has occurred, and if so, what kind of learning has taken place, to what extent, between whom, when, and how.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management.

TL;DR: The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of participatory processes on sustainability indicator identification and environmental management in three disparate case studies to draw three primary conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

TL;DR: It is argued that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and a shift in science is encouraged from the development of knowledge integration products to theDevelopment of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes.