scispace - formally typeset
M

Michael Harrington

Researcher at University of Queensland

Publications -  56
Citations -  2189

Michael Harrington is an academic researcher from University of Queensland. The author has contributed to research in topics: Vocabulary & Sentence. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 55 publications receiving 2044 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael Harrington include International University of Japan & University of California, Santa Cruz.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

L2 Working Memory Capacity and L2 Reading Skill

TL;DR: The authors examined the sensitivity of second language learners to differences in reading skill among advanced L2 learners using the reading span test and found that subjects with larger working memory capacities scored higher on measures of reading skill, in contrast with the lack of strong correlations between measures of passive short-term storage and the same reading measures.
Journal ArticleDOI

Aspects of working memory in L2 learning

TL;DR: This paper reviewed the role of working memory in explaining individual differences in L2 learning processes and outcomes, including sentence processing, reading, speaking, lexical development and general proficiency, and found that WM is not a unitary construct and its role varies depending on the age of the L2 learners, the task and the linguistic domain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parsing Effects in Second Language Sentence Processing: Subject and Object Asymmetries in wh-Extraction

TL;DR: Claims in the literature that principles of Universal Grammar are not available to adult learners are not supported by results, which show that parsing, and not grammatical competence, is the source of difficulty on performance with subject extraction sentences.
Journal ArticleDOI

Garden Path Sentences and Error Data in Second Language Sentence Processing.

TL;DR: The authors compare the difficulty of parsing subject wh-traces in embedded finite and non-finite clauses with the problems they have in parsing Garden Path (GP) sentences using the moving window technique and find that L2 learners of English may have a parsing, rather than a competence, deficit in judging grammatical wh-extraction.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge:

TL;DR: Huibregtse et al. as discussed by the authors found that the Yes/No test is a valid measure of the type of L2 vocabulary knowledge assessed by the VLT, with implications for classroom application.