scispace - formally typeset
M

Michelle Annette King

Researcher at Griffith University

Publications -  90
Citations -  2906

Michelle Annette King is an academic researcher from Griffith University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Pharmacy & Clinical pharmacy. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 84 publications receiving 2228 citations. Previous affiliations of Michelle Annette King include University of Aberdeen & University of Queensland.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.

TL;DR: An overview of the NGT and Delphi technique is provided, including the steps involved and the types of research questions best suited to each method, with examples from the pharmacy literature.
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient-Centered Approaches to Health Care A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

TL;DR: Although it was difficult to draw firm conclusions, this review has shown some promising findings from implementing a patient-centered care approach and there appeared to be benefits associated with this model of care in terms of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes

TL;DR: This intervention improved nursing home resident outcomes related to changes in drug use and drug-related expenditure and suggests that the difference would have been more significant in a larger and longer study, and even more so using additional instruments specific for measuring outcomes related for changes indrug use.
Journal ArticleDOI

Burden of treatment for chronic illness: a concept analysis and review of the literature.

TL;DR: Treatment burden, the burden associated with the treatment and management of chronic illness, has not yet been well articulated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Using the Nominal Group Technique: how to analyse across multiple groups

TL;DR: Whether different approaches to analysis provide the same outcome/s is explored, and whether more than one analysis process is needed to ensure that the results truly reflect participant priorities.