O
O. Pearl Brereton
Researcher at Keele University
Publications - 10
Citations - 4514
O. Pearl Brereton is an academic researcher from Keele University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 8, co-authored 10 publications receiving 3398 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review
Barbara Kitchenham,O. Pearl Brereton,David Budgen,Mark Turner,John W. Bailey,Stephen Linkman +5 more
TL;DR: The series of cost estimation SLRs demonstrate the potential value of EBSE for synthesising evidence and making it available to practitioners and European researchers appear to be the leading exponents of systematic literature reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A tertiary study
Barbara Kitchenham,Rialette Pretorius,David Budgen,O. Pearl Brereton,Mark Turner,Mahmood Niazi,Stephen Linkman +6 more
TL;DR: SLRs appear to have gone past the stage of being used solely by innovators but cannot yet be considered a main stream software engineering research methodology, such as often failing to assess primary study quality.
Journal ArticleDOI
Using mapping studies as the basis for further research - A participant-observer case study
TL;DR: Mapping studies can save time and effort for researchers and provide baselines to assist new research efforts, however, they must be of high quality in terms of completeness and rigour if they are to be a reliable basis for follow-on research.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
The value of mapping studies: a participantobserver case study
TL;DR: Mapping studies can save time and effort for researchers and provide baselines to assist new research efforts, however, they must be of high quality in terms of completeness and rigour if they are to be a reliable basis for follow-on research.
Journal ArticleDOI
Reporting systematic reviews: Some lessons from a tertiary study
TL;DR: A set of 12 'lessons' are derived that could help authors with reporting the outcomes of a systematic review in software engineering, including quality assessment, synthesis, and the procedures followed by the reviewers.