T
Tianjing Li
Researcher at University of Colorado Denver
Publications - 166
Citations - 44516
Tianjing Li is an academic researcher from University of Colorado Denver. The author has contributed to research in topics: Systematic review & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 140 publications receiving 10580 citations. Previous affiliations of Tianjing Li include Johns Hopkins University & Cochrane Collaboration.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page,Joanne E. McKenzie,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,David Moher +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as discussed by the authors was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found.
Journal ArticleDOI
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
Jonathan A C Sterne,Jelena Savović,Jelena Savović,Matthew J. Page,Roy G Elbers,Natalie S Blencowe,Isabelle Boutron,Isabelle Boutron,Isabelle Boutron,Christopher J Cates,Hung-Yuan Cheng,Mark Corbett,Sandra Eldridge,Jonathan Emberson,Miguel A. Hernán,Sally Hopewell,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Daniela R Junqueira,Peter Jüni,Jamie J Kirkham,Toby J Lasserson,Tianjing Li,Alexandra McAleenan,Barnaby C Reeves,Sasha Shepperd,Ian Shrier,Lesley A. Stewart,Kate Tilling,Ian R. White,Penny Whiting,Penny Whiting,Julian P T Higgins,Julian P T Higgins +33 more
TL;DR: The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool has been updated to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.
Journal ArticleDOI
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Miranda Cumpston,Tianjing Li,Matthew J. Page,Jacqueline Chandler,Vivian Welch,Julian P T Higgins,James Thomas +6 more
TL;DR: On a shelf in the sunny, open-plan office of Cochrane Australia in Melbourne, there's a large, white ring-binder that, it's fair to say, hasn't been opened in a while.
Journal ArticleDOI
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
Matthew J. Page,David Moher,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,Joanne E. McKenzie +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA 2020) as mentioned in this paper was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews, and has been updated to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology.
Journal ArticleDOI
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page,Joanne E. McKenzie,Patrick M.M. Bossuyt,Isabelle Boutron,Tammy Hoffmann,Cynthia D. Mulrow,Larissa Shamseer,Jennifer Tetzlaff,Elie A. Akl,Sue E. Brennan,Roger Chou,Julie Glanville,Jeremy M. Grimshaw,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson,Manoj M. Lalu,Tianjing Li,Elizabeth Loder,Evan Mayo-Wilson,Steve McDonald,Luke A McGuinness,Lesley A. Stewart,James Thomas,Andrea C. Tricco,Vivian Welch,Penny Whiting,David Moher +25 more
TL;DR: The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement as discussed by the authors was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found.