V
Vineet Padmanabhan
Researcher at University UCINF
Publications - 128
Citations - 12122
Vineet Padmanabhan is an academic researcher from University UCINF. The author has contributed to research in topics: Recommender system & Collaborative filtering. The author has an hindex of 33, co-authored 122 publications receiving 11404 citations. Previous affiliations of Vineet Padmanabhan include INSEAD & Washington University in St. Louis.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect
TL;DR: The authors analyzes four sources of the bullwhip effect: demand signal processing, rationing game, order batching, and price variations, and shows that the distortion tends to increase as one moves upstream.
Journal Article
The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify four major causes of the bullwhip effect: demand forecast updating, rationing, price fluctuation, and shortage games, and they suggest several ways in which companies can counteract the effect.
Journal ArticleDOI
The bullwhip effect in supply chains
TL;DR: The bullwhip effect occurs when the demand order variabilities in a supply chain are amplified as they moved up the supply chain this article, which can lead to tremendous inefficiencies: excessive inventory investment, poor customer service, lost revenues, misguided capacity plans, inactive transportation, and missed production schedules.
Journal ArticleDOI
Manufacturer's Return Policies and Retail Competition
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study the strategic effect of returns policies on retail competition and highlight its profitability implications for a manufacturer and show that when retailing is competitive and there is no uncertainty in demand, a returns policy subtly induces retailers to compete more intensely.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Decomposition of Promotional Response: An Empirical Generalization
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the effect of price promotions on the primary and secondary demand elasticity of 173 brands across 13 different product categories and found that 25% of the total price elasticity is due to primary demand expansion and 75% to secondary demand effects or brand switching.