Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format
Recent searches

Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format Example of Accreditation and Quality Assurance format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Accreditation and Quality Assurance — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality #111 of 165 down down by 28 ranks
Chemical Engineering (all) #192 of 279 down down by 29 ranks
Chemistry (all) #282 of 398 down down by 50 ranks
Instrumentation #102 of 128 down down by 21 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 172 Published Papers | 196 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 16/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Royal Society of Chemistry

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.9
SJR: 0.746
SNIP: 0.87
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 17.6
SJR: 4.893
SNIP: 2.289
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.4
SJR: 1.24
SNIP: 1.295
open access Open Access

American Chemical Society

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.6
SJR: 0.878
SNIP: 1.033

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.662

17% from 2018

Impact factor for Accreditation and Quality Assurance from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.662
2018 0.8
2017 0.667
2016 0.725
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.1

10% from 2019

CiteRatio for Accreditation and Quality Assurance from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.1
2019 1.0
2018 1.2
2017 1.2
2016 1.4
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 17% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.193

12% from 2019

SJR for Accreditation and Quality Assurance from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.193
2019 0.22
2018 0.309
2017 0.316
2016 0.299
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.503

21% from 2019

SNIP for Accreditation and Quality Assurance from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.503
2019 0.637
2018 0.707
2017 0.677
2016 0.757
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 21% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

 Accreditation and Quality Assurance (Accred. Qual. Assur.; "ACQUAL") publishes conceptual and practice-oriented articles on all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. This is aimed at disseminating...... Read More

Engineering

i
Last updated on
16 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0949-1775
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.801
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S007690050141
Reference materials for large-scale metal deposition surveys
Eiliv Steinnes1, Åke Rühling, Harri Lippo2, Ahti Mäkinen3

Abstract:

In order to ensure quality assurance in large-scale environmental contamination studies involving many different analytical laboratories, the use of calibrated reference materials is essential. Prior to a survey of atmospheric metal deposition in 1995 comprising 20 countries and covering large parts of Europe, the lack of sui... In order to ensure quality assurance in large-scale environmental contamination studies involving many different analytical laboratories, the use of calibrated reference materials is essential. Prior to a survey of atmospheric metal deposition in 1995 comprising 20 countries and covering large parts of Europe, the lack of suitable reference materials of moss and organic-rich soil was apparent. In order to improve the quality of analytical data to be produced in this international survey, candidate analytical laboratories were invited to participate in an intercomparison exercise. Three moss and three soil humus reference samples specifically prepared for this purpose were distributed anonymously among the laboratories, which were asked to report data for ten priority elements (V, Cr, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, Hg, Pb) and as many additional elements as they determined normally. In this paper the analytical data from the intercomparison are evaluated, and recommended values for the ten priority elements and 17 additional elements (B, Na, Mg, Al, S, K, Ca, Mn, Co, Se, Rb, Sr, Sb, Cs, Ba, La, Th) in each of the six reference samples are established. These samples should be useful for similar future studies including areas where the contamination levels are very low. read more read less
281 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S007690000261
Homogeneity and stability of reference materials

Abstract:

Homogeneity and stability are two crucial characteristics of any certified reference material (CRM). Utmost care must be taken during preparation to create materials as homogeneous and stable as possible. Degradation can generally be minimised by reducing the water activity of the material to a level between 0.15 and 0.35. Ho... Homogeneity and stability are two crucial characteristics of any certified reference material (CRM). Utmost care must be taken during preparation to create materials as homogeneous and stable as possible. Degradation can generally be minimised by reducing the water activity of the material to a level between 0.15 and 0.35. However, careful preparation by itself is not enough. Positive demonstration of homogeneity and stability is required from the perspective of implementing uncertainty calculus according to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). In many cases, homogeneity and stability studies fail to give sufficient quantitative information on homogeneity and stability, mainly because of a lack of measurement repeatability and insufficient number of replicates. In this work, some solutions to these problems and their implications are presented. read more read less
245 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00769-006-0191-Z
Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision
Antonio Menditto1, Marina Patriarca1, Bertil Magnusson

Abstract:

Clear definitions of basic terms, used to describe the quality of measurements, is essential for communication among scientists as well as when reporting measurement results to clients. Even if appropriate definitions are given in international standards and guidelines, the understanding of some basic terms sometimes proves d... Clear definitions of basic terms, used to describe the quality of measurements, is essential for communication among scientists as well as when reporting measurement results to clients. Even if appropriate definitions are given in international standards and guidelines, the understanding of some basic terms sometimes proves difficult. The reasons for this are various, e.g., the same words being defined rather differently in encyclopaedias and in international standards as well as concepts, well established in some languages, that may be relatively new in other national communities and at large in the international one. Here we present a matrix intended to clarify the relationships between the type of error affecting an analytical measurement, the respective qualitative concepts (performance characteristics) and their quantitative expression. read more read less

Topics:

Terminology (52%)52% related to the paper
224 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S00769-002-0487-6
Linearity of calibration curves: use and misuse of the correlation coefficient
Joris Van Loco, Marc Elskens1, Christophe Croux2, H. Beernaert

Abstract:

The correlation coefficient is commonly used to evaluate the de- gree of linear association between two variables. However, it can be shown that a correlation coefficient very close to one might also be ob- tained for a clear curved relation- ship. Other statistical tests, like the Lack-of-fit and Mandel's fitting test thus a... The correlation coefficient is commonly used to evaluate the de- gree of linear association between two variables. However, it can be shown that a correlation coefficient very close to one might also be ob- tained for a clear curved relation- ship. Other statistical tests, like the Lack-of-fit and Mandel's fitting test thus appear more suitable for the validation of the linear calibration model. A number of cadmium cali- bration curves from atomic absorp- tion spectroscopy were assessed for their linearity. All the investigated calibration curves were characterized by a high correlation coefficient (r >0.997) and low quality coeffi- cient (QC <5%), but the straight-line model was systematically rejected at the 95% confidence level on the ba- sis of the Lack-of-fit and Mandel's fitting test. Furthermore, significant- ly different results were achieved be- tween a linear regression model (LRM) and a quadratic regression (QRM) model in forecasting values for mid-scale calibration standards. The results obtained with the QRM did not differ significantly from the theoretically expected value, while those obtained with the LRM were systematically biased. It was con- cluded that a straight-line model with a high correlation coefficient, but with a lack-of-fit, yields signifi- cantly less accurate results than its curvilinear alternative. read more read less

Topics:

Correlation coefficient (59%)59% related to the paper, Coefficient of determination (56%)56% related to the paper, Fisher transformation (54%)54% related to the paper, Linear regression (54%)54% related to the paper, Polynomial regression (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
206 Citations
Book Chapter DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27034-5_1
Bioanalytical method validation and its implications for forensic and clinical toxicology – A review
Frank T. Peters1, Hans H. Maurer1

Abstract:

The reliability of analytical data is very important to forensic and clinical toxicologists for the correct interpretation of toxicological findings This makes (bio)analytical method validation an integral part of quality management and accreditation in analytical toxicology Therefore, consensus should be reached in this fiel... The reliability of analytical data is very important to forensic and clinical toxicologists for the correct interpretation of toxicological findings This makes (bio)analytical method validation an integral part of quality management and accreditation in analytical toxicology Therefore, consensus should be reached in this field on the kind and extent of validation experiments as well as on acceptance criteria for validation parameters In this review, the most important papers published on this topic since 1991 have been reviewed Terminology, theoretical and practical aspects as well as implications for forensic and clinical toxicology of the following validation parameters are discussed: selectivity (specificity), calibration model (linearity), accuracy, precision, limits, stability, recovery and ruggedness (robustness) read more read less

Topics:

Analytical Toxicology (58%)58% related to the paper
173 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Accreditation and Quality Assurance.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Accreditation and Quality Assurance format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Accreditation and Quality Assurance in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Accreditation and Quality Assurance guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Accreditation and Quality Assurance guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Accreditation and Quality Assurance guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Accreditation and Quality Assurance citation style.

4. Can I use the Accreditation and Quality Assurance templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Accreditation and Quality Assurance.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Accreditation and Quality Assurance that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Accreditation and Quality Assurance that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Accreditation and Quality Assurance.

7. Where can I find the template for the Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Accreditation and Quality Assurance's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Accreditation and Quality Assurance's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Accreditation and Quality Assurance an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Accreditation and Quality Assurance is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Accreditation and Quality Assurance?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Accreditation and Quality Assurance, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Accreditation and Quality Assurance's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Accreditation and Quality Assurance. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Accreditation and Quality Assurance are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Accreditation and Quality Assurance?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Accreditation and Quality Assurance's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Accreditation and Quality Assurance in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Accreditation and Quality Assurance Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Accreditation and Quality Assurance formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template