Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format
Recent searches

Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format Example of Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Horticulture #25 of 86 up up by 20 ranks
Agronomy and Crop Science #125 of 347 up up by 81 ranks
Plant Science #171 of 445 up up by 98 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Good
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 304 Published Papers | 776 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 19/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.643
SNIP: 0.963
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.4
SJR: 0.928
SNIP: 1.231
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.521
SNIP: 0.636
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.491
SNIP: 0.92

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.526

61% from 2018

Impact factor for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.526
2018 0.946
2017 0.622
2016 0.485
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.6

37% from 2019

CiteRatio for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.6
2019 1.9
2018 1.3
2017 1.0
2016 0.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 61% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 37% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.465

25% from 2019

SJR for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.465
2019 0.372
2018 0.329
2017 0.238
2016 0.278
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.058

24% from 2019

SNIP for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.058
2019 0.856
2018 0.648
2017 0.429
2016 0.458
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 25% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 24% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection formatting guidelines as mentioned in Springer author instructions. The current version was created on and has been used by 949 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

i
Last updated on
18 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1861-3837
i
Open Access
Hybrid
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
White faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S41348-017-0124-6
Benefits of hyperspectral imaging for plant disease detection and plant protection: a technical perspective

Abstract:

The detection and identification of plant diseases is crucial for an appropriate and targeted application of plant protection measures in crop production. Recently, intensive research has been conducted to develop innovative and technology-based optical methods for plant disease detection. In contrast to common visual rating ... The detection and identification of plant diseases is crucial for an appropriate and targeted application of plant protection measures in crop production. Recently, intensive research has been conducted to develop innovative and technology-based optical methods for plant disease detection. In contrast to common visual rating and detection methods, optical sensors are able to measure pathogen-induced changes in the plant physiology non-invasively and objectively. Several studies showed that especially hyperspectral sensors are valuable tools for disease detection, identification and quantification on different scales from the tissue to the canopy level. This review describes the basic principles of hyperspectral measurements and different types of available hyperspectral sensors. Possible applications of hyperspectral sensors on different scales for disease detection and plant protection are discussed and evaluated. The advantages and disadvantages on each particular scale, as well as the impact of external factors, such as: light, wind, viewing angle, for measurements in laboratories, greenhouses and fields, are critically assessed in order to support researchers and agriculture technicians. Additionally, a comprehensive literature review about the use of hyperspectral sensors on these different scales for plant disease detection reflects the possibilities of non-invasive measurement systems. This highlights advantages of hyperspectral sensors when investigating plant–pathogen interactions through multiple examples. By some approaches, detection before visible symptoms appear is feasible. The potential of hyperspectral sensors as a tool for disease identification and quantification, based on disease characteristic changes in the plants spectral signature, is discussed as well. The review is concluded with an overview on different data analysis methods, which are required to extract key information from gathered hyperspectral datasets. read more read less

Topics:

Plant disease (64%)64% related to the paper, Hyperspectral imaging (56%)56% related to the paper
169 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF03356208
Quantitative analysis of the seasonal and tissue-specific expression of Cry1Ab in transgenic maize Mon810

Abstract:

The tissue-specific expression and seasonal abundance of Cry1Ab protein were determined in transgenic maize plants (Mon810, variety ‘Novelis’) from two field trials located near Bonn and Halle, Germany. A total of 1085 samples were analysed by using Double Antiserum-Enzyme Linked Immun-osorbent Assay (DAS-ELISA). The Cry1Ab c... The tissue-specific expression and seasonal abundance of Cry1Ab protein were determined in transgenic maize plants (Mon810, variety ‘Novelis’) from two field trials located near Bonn and Halle, Germany. A total of 1085 samples were analysed by using Double Antiserum-Enzyme Linked Immun-osorbent Assay (DAS-ELISA). The Cry1Ab contents of various plant tissues (root, stem, upper leaf, lower leaf, anther, pollen and kernel) were determined at four different growth stages (BBCH19, BBCH30, BBCH61 and BBCH83) collected in 2001, 2002 and 2003. Mon810 showed the highest Cry1Ab contents in the leaves (5.5–6.4 µg g–1 fresh weight [fw]) at BBCH83, whereas the lowest Cry1Ab contents were detected in the pollen (1–97 ng g–1 fw). Cry1Ab content of residual root stocks collected in the field nine months after harvest was 15–17 n g g–1 fw. This demonstrated that the Cry1Ab concentration in residual root stocks was reduced to about one-hundredth of the fresh roots. The monitoring of Cry1Ab expression showed that the Cry1Ab contents varied strongly between different plant individuals. read more read less
145 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF03356385
Response of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) to extracts of cashew kernels
C. O. Adedire1, Olusola M. Obembe1, R. O. Akinkurolere1, Samson O. Oduleye1

Abstract:

Cashew kernels were extracted with six different solvents namely methanol, ethanol, water, acetone, pet-ether and n-hexane. The different extraction products were evaluated on C. maculatus adults for their mortality, ovicidal and adult emergence effects. The long-term protectant ability of the cashew kernel extracts and water... Cashew kernels were extracted with six different solvents namely methanol, ethanol, water, acetone, pet-ether and n-hexane. The different extraction products were evaluated on C. maculatus adults for their mortality, ovicidal and adult emergence effects. The long-term protectant ability of the cashew kernel extracts and water absorption capacity of the treated cowpea seeds were also investigated. The results obtained showed that the steam distillate was most toxic to C. maculatus. The least toxic extracts on the insect were those of methanol and ethanol. The extracts drastically reduced oviposition in C. maculatus. The cowpea seeds treated with steam distillate had the lowest water absorption capacity, while the highest water absorption capacity was obtained in grains treated with ethanol and methanol. At 2.0% v/w cashew kernel extracts, the percentage water absorption capacity of cowpea seeds increased with increase in the interval of submergence. Steam distillate and the extracts of n-hexane, pet-ether and acetone completely prevented infestation and damage of the treated cowpea seeds for a period of three months as there was neither weight loss nor damage in the treated grains. In the grains treated with the methanol and ethanol extracts, damage of 20.17% and 9.76% were recorded, respectively. The results obtained from this study revealed that extract of cashew kernel is effective in controlling cowpea storage bruchid, C. maculatus and could serve as an alternative to synthetic insecticides for the protection of stored cowpeas against bruchids. read more read less

Topics:

Callosobruchus maculatus (56%)56% related to the paper
127 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF03356188
Quantifying the effects of previous crop, tillage, cultivar and triazole fungicides on the deoxynivalenol content of wheat grain — a review
Marco Beyer1, Melanie B. Klix1, Holger Klink1, Joseph-Alexander Verreet1

Abstract:

Deoxynivalenol (DON) is a mycotoxin produced by fungi of the genus Fusarium. Maximum tolerable DON concentrations for grain and selected wheat products were laid down by national and European legislative institutions to protect consumers from health risks associated with the intake of this mycotoxin. Among the factors that ca... Deoxynivalenol (DON) is a mycotoxin produced by fungi of the genus Fusarium. Maximum tolerable DON concentrations for grain and selected wheat products were laid down by national and European legislative institutions to protect consumers from health risks associated with the intake of this mycotoxin. Among the factors that can be controlled by growers, previous crop, tillage, wheat cultivar and fungicide regimes were identified as the most important variables for DON contamination of wheat. Beyond the identification of the risk factors, their quantitative impact needs to be known for integrated control strategies. The purpose of this review was to extract information on the magnitude of DON reductions caused by agronomic methods or fungicide applications from recent publications. Efficacies of fungicides containing triazoles as active ingredient differed significantly (P= 0.004) in the studies published recently. This effect was solely based on a poor performance of fenbuconazole. No significant differences between triazole fungicide efficacies were observed after excluding fenbuconazole from the analysis. On average, triazole fungicides applied around the time of wheat anthesis reduced the DON content to 53 ± 4% of the grain obtained from untreated control plots. Planting wheat after crops other than maize reduced the DON content to 33 ± 11% compared to maize as the pre-crop. Using a mouldboard plough lowered the DON content to 33 ± 7% compared to minimal or no tillage plots. Cultivating commercially available moderately susceptible cultivars decreased the DON content down to 24 ± 7% compared to susceptible cultivars. Hence, careful choice of cultivar is currently the most effective agronomic method to decrease DON contamination levels in wheat followed by ploughing, avoiding maize as pre-crop and applying triazole fungicides at wheat anthesis. If DON contents of reference scenarios (for instance long term average DON contamination levels for particular cultural practices and regions) are known, the factors extracted in this review may be useful to estimate how many risk factors need to be avoided to decrease DON contents below the limits given in the actual legal regulations. read more read less
117 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/BF03356321
Effects of sulfated polysaccharide and alcoholic extracts from green seaweed Ulva fasciata on anthracnose severity and growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Abstract:

Seaweed compounds can play important roles in either plant growth promoting or plant-pathogen interactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of crude extracts and sulfated polysaccharides isolated from the green macroalga Ulva fasciata in the control of bean anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthian... Seaweed compounds can play important roles in either plant growth promoting or plant-pathogen interactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of crude extracts and sulfated polysaccharides isolated from the green macroalga Ulva fasciata in the control of bean anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum as well the influence in the plant growth. Sulfated polysaccharides, called ulvan, were extracted with hot water, precipitated in ethanol and identified by chemical and spectroscopic methods (13C NMR). The contents of sulfate, uronic acid, protein and monosaccharides were determined. In order to obtain the crude extracts, the dried alga was extracted with methanol in Soxhlet apparatus or with ethanol at room temperature. The effect of ulvan (0.1; 1; and 10 mg ml−1) and crude extracts were tested in vitro on conidial germination and mycelial growth of C. lindemuthianum and also on the seed germination and seedling length of bean. Under greenhouse conditions, bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were sprayed twice with ulvan or extracts and inoculated two days after the second application. The anthracnose severity was evaluated 7 days and aerial plant dry weight 14 days after inoculation. The soluble methanolic extract inhibited the mycelial growth of C. lindemuthianum in vitro, but did not reduce the disease severity under greenhouse conditions. Foliar spray of methanolic extracts enhanced the dry weight of bean plants by 20%. In contrast, ulvan increased in vitro the mycelium growth and the conidia germination of the fungus, but in greenhouse, the spray of 10 mg ml−1 ulvan reduced the anthracnose severity by 38% without affecting plant growth. The results indicate that ulvan is probably able to induce resistance to bean anthracnose. read more read less

Topics:

Colletotrichum lindemuthianum (59%)59% related to the paper, Spore germination (53%)53% related to the paper, Phaseolus (52%)52% related to the paper, Germination (50%)50% related to the paper
114 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection citation style.

4. Can I use the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection.

7. Where can I find the template for the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template