Example of NanoEthics format
Recent searches

Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format Example of NanoEthics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

NanoEthics — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Philosophy #23 of 644 up up by 23 ranks
History and Philosophy of Science #13 of 166 up up by 9 ranks
Sociology and Political Science #213 of 1269 up up by 86 ranks
Social Sciences (miscellaneous) #68 of 334 up up by 12 ranks
Management of Technology and Innovation #94 of 248 down down by 15 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 77 Published Papers | 231 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 03/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.7
SJR: 1.0
SNIP: 2.108

De Gruyter

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 0.4
SJR: 0.197
SNIP: 0.463

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.5
SJR: 0.571
SNIP: 1.3

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

3.0

11% from 2019

CiteRatio for NanoEthics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 3.0
2019 2.7
2018 2.5
2017 1.9
2016 1.6
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.301

45% from 2019

SJR for NanoEthics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.301
2019 0.552
2018 0.427
2017 0.284
2016 0.247
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.556

47% from 2019

SNIP for NanoEthics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.556
2019 1.044
2018 1.199
2017 0.475
2016 0.756
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 11% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 45% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 47% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

NanoEthics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

NanoEthics

Rationale Nanoscale technologies are currently surrounded by both hype and fear. Optimists suggest that these technologies are desperately needed to solve problems of terrorism, global warming, the shortage of clean water, land degradation and health. Pessimists fear the loss ...... Read More

Philosophy

History and Philosophy of Science

Sociology and Political Science

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Management of Technology and Innovation

Arts and Humanities

i
Last updated on
03 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
1871-4757
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.7
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11569-007-0007-6
If and Then: A Critique of Speculative NanoEthics
Alfred Nordmann1
20 Apr 2007 - Nanoethics

Abstract:

Most known technology serves to ingeniously adapt the world to the physical and mental limitations of human beings. Humankind has acquired awesome power with its rather limited means. Nanotechnological capabilities further this power. On some accounts, however, nanotechnological research will contribute to a rather different ... Most known technology serves to ingeniously adapt the world to the physical and mental limitations of human beings. Humankind has acquired awesome power with its rather limited means. Nanotechnological capabilities further this power. On some accounts, however, nanotechnological research will contribute to a rather different kind of technological development, namely one that changes human beings so as to remove or reduce their physical and mental limitations. The prospect of this technological development has inspired a fair amount of ethical debate. Here, proponents and opponents of such visions of human enhancement are criticized alike for engaging in speculative ethics. This critique exposes a general pattern that extends to other nano-, bio-, or neuroethical debates. While it does not apply to all discussions of “enhancement technologies” it does apply to all ethical discourse that constructs and validates an incredible future which it only then proceeds to endorse or critique. This discourse violates conditions of intelligibility, squanders the scarce and valuable resource of ethical concern, and misleads by casting remote possibilities or philosophical thought-experiments as foresight about likely technical developments. In effect, it deflects consideration from the transformative technologies of the present. read more read less

Topics:

Human enhancement (54%)54% related to the paper
View PDF
286 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11569-007-0005-8
Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology
Tsjalling Swierstra1, Arie Rip1
05 Apr 2007 - Nanoethics

Abstract:

There might not be a specific nano-ethics, but there definitely is an ethics of new & emerging science and technology (NEST), with characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation. Ethical discussion in and around nanoscience and technology reflects such NEST-ethics. We offer an inventory of the arguments, and show p... There might not be a specific nano-ethics, but there definitely is an ethics of new & emerging science and technology (NEST), with characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation. Ethical discussion in and around nanoscience and technology reflects such NEST-ethics. We offer an inventory of the arguments, and show patterns in their evolution, in arenas full of proponents and opponents. We also show that there are some nano-specific issues: in how size matters, and when agency is delegated to smart devices. Our overall approach is a pragmatist ethics, and we conclude that struggle (and learning) might be more productive than models emphasizing consensus. read more read less

Topics:

Agency (philosophy) (54%)54% related to the paper, Argumentation theory (52%)52% related to the paper, Consequentialism (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
266 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11569-016-0280-3
The Vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the Making—a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded
Sabine Pfeiffer1
25 Jan 2017 - Nanoethics

Abstract:

Since industrial trade fair Hannover Messe 2011, the term “Industrie 4.0” has ignited a vision of a new Industrial Revolution and has been inspiring a lively, ongoing debate among the German public about the future of work, and hence society, ever since. The discourse around this vision of the future eventually spread to othe... Since industrial trade fair Hannover Messe 2011, the term “Industrie 4.0” has ignited a vision of a new Industrial Revolution and has been inspiring a lively, ongoing debate among the German public about the future of work, and hence society, ever since. The discourse around this vision of the future eventually spread to other countries, with public awareness reaching a temporary peak in 2016 when the World Economic Forum’s meeting in Davos was held with the motto “Mastering the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” How is it possible for a vision originally established by three German engineers to unfold and bear fruit at a global level in such a short period of time? This article begins with a summary of the key ideas that are discussed under the label Industrie 4.0. The main purpose, based on an in-depth discourse analysis, is to debunk the myth about the origin of this powerful vision and to trace the narrative back to the global economic crisis in 2009 and thus to the real actors, central discourse patterns, and hidden intentions of this vision of a new Industrial Revolution. In conclusion, the discourse analysis reveals that this is not a case of visioneering but one of a future told, tamed, and traded. read more read less

Topics:

Industry 4.0 (52%)52% related to the paper, Trade fair (51%)51% related to the paper, Discourse analysis (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
203 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11569-007-0016-5
Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions
Erik Fisher1
10 Aug 2007 - Nanoethics

Abstract:

In an attempt to shape the development of nanotechnologies, ethics policy programs promote engagement in the hope of broadening the scope of considerations that scientists and engineers take into account. While enhancing the reflexivity of scientists theoretically implies changes in technoscientific practice, few empirical st... In an attempt to shape the development of nanotechnologies, ethics policy programs promote engagement in the hope of broadening the scope of considerations that scientists and engineers take into account. While enhancing the reflexivity of scientists theoretically implies changes in technoscientific practice, few empirical studies demonstrate such effects. To investigate the real-time effects on engineering research practices, a laboratory engagement study was undertaken to specify the interplay of technical and social considerations during the normal course of research. The study employed an ethnographic invention in the form of a decision model to structure reflection on ongoing social processes. A short series of interactions with one engineering researcher illustrates the deployment of the model in the form of an interview protocol. The cultural embedment of the protocol allowed it to function as a feedback mechanism, creating a more self-critical environment for knowledge production, and perturbing the system in research-tolerable ways. read more read less

Topics:

Empirical research (51%)51% related to the paper, Reflexivity (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
162 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11569-012-0141-7
Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies
Philip A.E. Brey1
04 Apr 2012 - Nanoethics

Abstract:

In this essay, a new approach for the ethical study of emerging technology ethics will be presented, called anticipatory technology ethics (ATE). The ethics of emerging technology is the study of ethical issues at the R&D and introduction stage of technology development through anticipation of possible future devices, applica... In this essay, a new approach for the ethical study of emerging technology ethics will be presented, called anticipatory technology ethics (ATE). The ethics of emerging technology is the study of ethical issues at the R&D and introduction stage of technology development through anticipation of possible future devices, applications, and social consequences. I will argue that a major problem for its development is the problem of uncertainty, which can only be overcome through methodologically sound forecasting and futures studies. I will then consider three contemporary approaches to the ethics of emerging technologies that use forecasting: ethical technology assessment, the techno-ethical scenarios approach and the ETICA approach, and I considered their strengths and weaknesses. Based on this critical study, I then present my own approach: ATE. ATE is a conceptually and methodologically rich approach for the ethical analysis of emerging technologies that incorporates a large variety of ethical principles, issues, objects and levels of analysis, and research aims. It is ready to be applied to contemporary and future emerging technologies read more read less

Topics:

Information ethics (61%)61% related to the paper, Ethics of technology (59%)59% related to the paper, Emerging technologies (56%)56% related to the paper, Futures studies (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
156 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for NanoEthics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

NanoEthics format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write NanoEthics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the NanoEthics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the NanoEthics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the NanoEthics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in NanoEthics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the NanoEthics citation style.

4. Can I use the NanoEthics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for NanoEthics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in NanoEthics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper NanoEthics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in NanoEthics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in NanoEthics.

7. Where can I find the template for the NanoEthics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per NanoEthics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the NanoEthics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. NanoEthics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's NanoEthics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like NanoEthics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like NanoEthics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using NanoEthics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in NanoEthics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is NanoEthics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for NanoEthics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for NanoEthics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In NanoEthics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for NanoEthics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the NanoEthics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per NanoEthics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download NanoEthics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in NanoEthics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to NanoEthics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template