Example of New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science format

Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace

This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.

Open Access

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer

Your data will always be in your control. Learn more

Get started with a free account

— or sign up using email —

See how it works

Guideline source

Categories	Rank	Trend in last 3 yrs
Forestry	#62 of 142	down by 22 ranks
Plant Science	#199 of 445	down by 50 ranks
Ecology	#188 of 400	down by 48 ranks
Chemical Engineering (all)	#151 of 279	down by 47 ranks

Journal quality:

Good

Last 4 years overview: 70 Published Papers | 150 Citations

Indexed in: Scopus

Last updated: 16/06/2020

Related journals

Insights

General info

Related Journals

Open Access

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

NRC Research Press

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 3.6

SJR: 0.677

SNIP: 0.885

Open Access

Forest Ecosystems

Springer

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 3.7

SJR: 1.001

SNIP: 1.212

Open Access

Fungal Ecology

Elsevier

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 5.2

SJR: 1.039

SNIP: 1.058

Open Access

Journal of Forest Economics

Elsevier

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 4.1

SJR: 0.825

SNIP: 0.956

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.1

5% from 2019

CiteRatio for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	2.1
2019	2.2
2018	2.2
2017	2.3
2016	1.7

Graph view

0.419

51% from 2019

SJR for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	0.419
2019	0.278
2018	0.411
2017	0.582
2016	0.475

Graph view

0.847

43% from 2019

SNIP for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	0.847
2019	0.593
2018	0.864
2017	0.949
2016	0.594

Graph view

Insights

CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 5% in last years.
This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

SJR of this journal has increased by 51% in last years.
This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

SNIP of this journal has increased by 43% in last years.
This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

The New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science is an international journal covering the breadth of forestry science. While planted forests are a particular focus, manuscripts on a wide range of forestry topics (including tropical species, climate change, and policy) will also be considered. Forestry species are those capable of reaching at least five metres in height at maturity in the place they are located, but not grown or managed primarily for fruit or nut production. Each article type published by New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science follows a specific format, as detailed in the corresponding instructions for authors; please choose an article type from the list on the left to view the instructions for authors. The instructions for authors includes information about preparing a manuscript for submission to New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, criteria for publication and the online submission process. Other relevant information about the journal's policies, the refereeing process and so on can be found in 'About this journal'. Read Less

Forestry species

Last updated on	15 Jun 2020
ISSN	1179-5395
Impact Factor	Low - 0.422
Open Access	No
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy	Green
Plagiarism Check	Available via Turnitin
Endnote Style	Download Available
Bibliography Name	SPBASIC
Citation Type	Author Year (Blonder et al, 1982)
Bibliography Example	Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Open access • Journal Article •

Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings.

G. A. Ritchie, J. R. Dunlap

01 Jan 1980 - New Zealand journal of forestry science

Abstract:

This review presents a synthesis of current knowledge on Root Growth Potential (RGP) of nursery-grown forest seedlings. RGP, the measure of a transplanted seedling's ability to rapidly produce new roots, is a key indicator of seedling vigour and survival after planting. Physiologically, RGP appears to be closely linked to bud... This review presents a synthesis of current knowledge on Root Growth Potential (RGP) of nursery-grown forest seedlings. RGP, the measure of a transplanted seedling's ability to rapidly produce new roots, is a key indicator of seedling vigour and survival after planting. Physiologically, RGP appears to be closely linked to bud dormancy. It peaks when the chilling requirement for dormancy release is fulfilled, then declines, presumably reflecting the internal allocation of current photo-assimilate to shoot growth. RGP can be manipulated in the nursery through practices that induce dormancy, increase root fibrosity, and enhance carbohydrate reserves. Autumn and winter nursery temperatures influence RGP through their effect on dormancy release. Date of lifting establishes the dormancy status of seedlings when they enter storage, and temperature and duration of storage further influence the dormancy status at the time of planting. Improper handling and misplanting can reduce RGP expression, as can low soil temperature, low soil water potential and soil compaction on the planting site. INTRODUCTION Initial survival of planted trees depends in large measure on their physiological readiness to rapidly produce new roots and thereby re-establish intimate contact with the soil (Smith, 1962). This ability is sometimes referred to as the "Root Growth Potential," or RGP, and many authors have stressed its importance as a critical ingredient of seedling quality and subsequent reforestation success (e.g., Gilmore, 1962; Zaerr, 1967; Larson, 1970; Larson and Whitmore, 1970; Lathrop and Mecklenberg, 1971; Etter and Carlson, 1973; Farmer, 1975; Day and MacGillivray, 1975; W. Webb, 1975a, b, 1977; von Lupke, 1976; Day et al., 1976). While it has been difficult to establish a clear cause-effect relationship between RGP and seedling survival after planting, a compelling body of evidence (summarised in Table 1) indicates that the two are often very closely correlated. Thirty years ago Wakeley (1948) emphasised that seedling morphological grades were inadequate indicators of seedling performance, and that seedlings that survived and performed well apparently did so due to their superior physiological grade. He concluded, however, "How to recognize physiological grades before planting the seedlings and observing their success or failure remains to be discovered." Some twenty years later, E. C. Stone and co-workers demonstrated that a seedling's ability to grow roots in a test environment could be used as a measure of seedling physiological grade or overall seedling vigour (Stone, 1955; Stone and Schubert, 1959b, c; Stone and Jenkinson, 1971). Furthermore, the period during which seedlings exhibit high RGP coincides very closely with the period during which they are most tolerant to desiccation and physical damage (Hermann, 1962, 1964, 1967; Mullin, 1978; Lavender and Wareing, 1972) and therefore are more able to survive the rigours of lifting, handling, storing and outplanting. The RGP level can thus be used, in effect, as an index of seedling resilience (Stone, 1955; Stone et al, 1963; Stone and Jenkinson, 1971; Day et al, 1976). N.Z. J . For . Sci. 10(1): 218-48 (1980). No. 1 Ritchie and Dunlap — Root Growth Potential in Tree Seedlings 219 TABLE 1. Relationship between Root Growth Potential and field survival. (Correlation ratings are authors' interpretations.) Species R G P vs. SURVIVAL Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) Loblolly pine (P. taeda) Ponderosa pine (P. ponderosa) Ponderosa pine (January planting) Ponderosa pine (March planting) Jeffrey pine (P. jeffreyi) Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) read more

201 Citations

Open access • Journal Article •

Above-ground dry matter, energy, and nutrient contents of trees in an age series of Pinus radiata plantations.

H. A. I. Madgwick, D. S. Jackson,

01 Jan 1977 - New Zealand journal of forestry science

Abstract:

Eight sample stands ranging in age from 2 to 22 years were studied to characterise dry matter, energy, and nutrient contents of the above-ground portion of intensively managed Pinus radiata D. Don plantations on a good site. Site index averaged 36 m at age 20. Dry matter content was closely comparable to similar data from Aus... Eight sample stands ranging in age from 2 to 22 years were studied to characterise dry matter, energy, and nutrient contents of the above-ground portion of intensively managed Pinus radiata D. Don plantations on a good site. Site index averaged 36 m at age 20. Dry matter content was closely comparable to similar data from Australia. Net dry matter production averaged 14.4 tonnes/ha/annum over the 22-year period; gross production was 22-25 tonnes/ ha/annum during initial canopy closure and during canopy closure after heavy thinning. Stand nutrient contents were predominantly in the order N = K>Ca>Mg = P>Mn>Na>Zn. The high potassium content probably reflects the potassium-rich pumice soils on which the stands were growing. Compared with published results for a wide variety of pine species, these stands had high rates of dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake. Nutrient content in relation to dry matter content was high for potassium, low for calcium, and intermediate for magnesium and manganese compared with other pines. Heavy thinning-to-waste with high pruning of remaining trees would have returned about 55% of the nutrients in the above-ground stand to the forest floor. The total amounts returned would have been similar to those resulting from harvesting of the 22-year-old stand. The total energy capture and the percentage of incoming radiation stored in woody tissue were high compared with published data for other forest types, even though the silvicultural practices employed were not designed to maximise energy capture. INTRODUCTION Information on nutrient and energy content of plantations is of increasing importance as a basis for understanding the ecological impact and economic limits of continuous forest production. Recent suggestions that forests can supply a renewable source of energy (Szego et al., 1972; Troughton, 1976) heighten the need for data. Temporary sample plots covering an age series of stands have been used as a traditional method of studying the volume growth of forests. More recently, following the lead of Ovington (1957a), this method has been used to study dry matter production and nutrient uptake. Use of temporary sample plots in this way assumes that all sites studied are uniform throughout the age range. Such plots can give reasonable estimates of standing crop but N.Z. J. For . Sci. 7(3): 445-68 (1977). 446 New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Vol. 7 estimates of periodic annual increment are not reliable (Spurr, 1952). Thus the data from such studies may be used to indicate general trends only. In New Zealand, Orman and Will (I960), Will (1964; 1966; 1968), and Gadgil (1976) have provided a number of estimates of dry matter production and nutrient content of Pinus radiata!). Don stands. In Australia, Forrest and Ovington (1970) have studied dry matter of P. radiata plantations up to age 12 years, with additional data provided in papers by Stephens and Bond (1957), Waring (1969; 1974), Siemon (1973), and Williams (1976). Data for one plantation are also available from Italy (Giulimondi and Duranti, 1975). The dry matter production and concurrent nutrient uptake of New Zealand P. radiata are of particular interest as the more productive sites carry some of the fastest-growing temperate conifer forests in the world. The purposes of the study reported here were to: (1) Determine the dry matter, energy, and nutrient content of an age series of P. radiata plantations on a high quality site; (2) Compare the results with comparable data from Australian plantations; (3) Place P. radiata dry matter production and nutrition in the perspective of pine as a genus. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sample Stands A series of eight plots, all within 9 km of each other, was selected in Pinus radiata plantations in the north-eastern corner of Kaingaroa Forest (38° 18'S, 176° 44'E). The average annual rainfall (1941-1970) for this area is between 1425 mm (Kopuriki, immediately south-east) and 1549 mm (Kaingaroa Forest Headquarters, to the southwest). The latter station has a mean annual temperature of 10.7 °C, with a seasonal range from 5.4°C in July u> 15.8°C in February, and an average of 107 ground frosts per annum. The sampled stands ranged in age from 2 to 22 years, and were growing on 75 to 100 cm of Tarawera scoria and Kaharoa ash, overlying older and more consolidated volcanic ash showers. These are classified as Matahina gravels or Matahina hill soils, with a site index of about 36 m at age 20 years (C. J. Goulding, unpubl.). Sample plots and stands chosen reflected as closely as possible the then current management practice of planting 2500 stems/ha, with live-crown pruning of selected crop trees to a height of 6 m followed by thinning to 540 stems/ha at about age 8 years, when the trees were 12 m tall. It was impossible to find stands over 10 years old which had received this treatment; thus, the 17-year-old plot had been thinned to 860 stems/ha, and the 22-year-old plot had been thinned at age 9 years. The 8-year-old stand had a low stocking (Beekhuis, 1966) and additional data on the effects of thinning and pruning, collected later, are included in the Appendix. Field Procedures In each plantation a previously established sample plot of 0.1 acres (approximately 0.04 ha) was selected and all the trees were measured for height and diameter. In the 8-year-old stand, which had been marked for thinning, a note was kept of trees to be removed. Sample trees covering the size range within each plot were felled. Seven trees were taken in unthinned plots and five trees in thinned plots. Sampling extended from June to September 1971. The crown of each sample tree was divided into zones No. 3 Madgwick et al.—Dry Matter, Energy and Nutrients in P. radiata 447 representing the year in which the branches were initiated. For each zone all firstand second-order branches were separated according to the age of needles which they bore, and each subdivision was weighed. Large subsamples were then separated into needles and woody material prior to being weighed after drying at 60 °C. Ratios of dry weight of needles and woody material to fresh weight were used to obtain estimates of total dry weight of each component for each zone of the crown. All cones within the crown were combined before drying and weighing. Male strobili were present on only the 2 2-year-old stand at the time of sampling. Stems were divided into sections and total fresh weight was determined prior to sampling for moisture content. Within the live crown each section comprised an annual height increment; below the lowest live branch, sections consisted of 2-metre lengths. Discs were cut from the end of each segment and at breast height for detailed study. Before drying, the discs were separated into* wood and bark. Laboratory Procedures In order to reduce the numbers of samples to be analysed, material was combined to provide one representative sample for each category of material for each tree. The categories chosen were needles by age class, live branches, dead branches, cones, strobili, stem bark, and stem wood. Canopy material was combined according to the relative proportion of material in each crown layer. Stem material was combined according to the relative weight of each segment of the stem. Woody material was chipped before grinding in a stainless-steel Wiley Mill, and needle material was ground directly. After drying, samples were ground to pass through a 1-mm round-holed sieve. Nitrogen was determined by a semi-micro-Kjeldahl procedure using a selenium catalyst (Bremner, I960). The ammonium N in the diluted digest was determined colorimetrically by an automated adaptation of the indophenol blue method. Phosphorus and cations (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Mn) were determined after dry-ashing at 480 °C, Test solutions were prepared from a dilute hydrochloric acid extract of the ash after preliminary removal of silica by a process involving dehydration. Phosphorus was determined colorimetrically by an automated adaptation of the vanadomolybdophosphoric acid yellow method described by Jackson (1958). Cations were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. For Ca and Mg, strontium chloride was added to the solutions as a releasing agent (at a concentration of 1500 ppm of Sr+) to prevent interference from aluminium and phosphate. All samples were analysed in duplicate. Analyses were repeated where the difference between duplicates relative to their mean values exceeded 6% for N , 4 % for P, 8% for K and Mg, 10% for Ca, and 14% for Zn. The variations m precision between elements reflect the known variation in analytical procedures (Madgwick, 1970b). Energy content was determined for ground samples using an adiabatic calorimeter (Lieth, 1965) and expressed on a dry weight basis. When the quantity of sample material was limited, the highest priority was given to nitrogen determinations and lowest to caloric value. Calculations The nutrient and energy contents of each sample tree were obtained by multiplying the oven-dry weight by the relevant concentration. Regressions were calculated relating 448 New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Vol. 7 logarithm component dry weight and nutrient content to logarithm height for 2and 4-year-old stands and logarithm height X (diameter) for older stands. Total dry weight and energy content of stand components were found by applying these regressions to the unsampled trees after correction for bias due to logarithmic transformation (Finney, 1941). This method is known to give reasonably close estimates of dry weight and overestimates of error terms (Madgwick and Satoo, 1976). In the present study 9 5 % confidence intervals in unthinned stands were about ± 20% and in thinned stands ± 40% of estimated totals, respectively. Separate estimates were made for the 8-year-old stand (a) in its unthinned condition and (b) assuming that the stand had been thinned and crop trees pruned to a height of 6 m. Net annual read more

Topics:

Pinus radiata (58%)58% related to the paper, Dry matter (52%)52% related to the paper

132 Citations

Open access • Journal Article •

Effects of stocking and thinning on wind damage in [pine] plantations.

K W Cremer, C J Borough,

01 Jan 1982 - New Zealand journal of forestry science

Topics:

Thinning (59%)59% related to the paper, Stocking (55%)55% related to the paper

117 Citations

Open access • Journal Article •

Eradication of invasive forest insects: concepts, methods, costs and benefits

Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, Andrew M. Liebhold,

01 Jan 2010 - New Zealand journal of forestry science

Abstract:

Invasive exotic insects can cause substantial damage to trees and the environment, and may reduce biodiversity. They can have a large negative economic effect on the forest industry, urban amenity trees and numerous other sectors, and they may necessitate extensive management expenditures. For such high-impact invaders, eradi... Invasive exotic insects can cause substantial damage to trees and the environment, and may reduce biodiversity. They can have a large negative economic effect on the forest industry, urban amenity trees and numerous other sectors, and they may necessitate extensive management expenditures. For such high-impact invaders, eradication is desirable but also difficult and often highly controversial. It requires substantial input of resources and commitment from managers and stakeholders, including the general public. Appropriate tools for surveillance and control of the target species must be available if success is to be achieved. This review outlines the sequence of steps required in well-managed operations; examines characteristics of successful and unsuccessful eradication campaigns; describes methods and tools known to be effective against specific pests; and discusses the analysis of costs and benefits of eradication programmes. Feasibility of eradication is increased by early detection, which is facilitated by systematic surveillance. A strong positive relationship exists between size of the affected geographical area and the cost of eradication. Treatment costs for large populations may be prohibitive. Five recent campaigns against lepidopteran species in New Zealand have provided substantial economic benefits, despite the fact that various non-market values were not considered. Although progress has been made in the development, utilisation and integration of eradication tools, some insects are still not amenable to treatment. There is a need for new methods shown to have a minimal effect on other organisms, including human beings. Public attitudes to eradication programmes must always be taken into account during planning and deployment. read more

View PDF

96 Citations

Open access • Journal Article •

Alien forest insects in a warmer world and a globalised economy: impacts of changes in trade, tourism and climate on forest biosecurity.

A. Roques, B. Richardson,

01 Jan 2010 - New Zealand journal of forestry science

Abstract:

This paper examines the effects of changing world trends on the introduction, establishment and spread of exotic insects associated with woody plants. Three aspects are considered: (i) commercial trade; (ii) tourism and consumer behaviour; and (iii) climate change. The current literature indicates that there are two key pest ... This paper examines the effects of changing world trends on the introduction, establishment and spread of exotic insects associated with woody plants. Three aspects are considered: (i) commercial trade; (ii) tourism and consumer behaviour; and (iii) climate change. The current literature indicates that there are two key pest pathways: movement of wood ( (including solid-wood packaging), and the ornamental plant trade. The number of pests introduced along these routes is positively correlated with the volume and source of imports. It is likely, therefore, that improvements in regulation of the movement of wood will lead to a decrease in pest entry via this pathway. However, complexities associated with the ornamental plant trade will ensure that it remains a high risk route. There is evidence to suggest that numbers of interceptions at airports are positively related to the volume of air traffic from the countries from which passengers originate. Shifts in climatic conditions are likely to affect the survival, fecundity, development and dispersal of native insect species. However, it is difficult to entirely disentangle the effect of climate change from that of other physical or chemical factors, and/or other biotic causes. Improved monitoring of imports/exports, more knowledge about possible pests, and the impacts of climate change are needed to prevent the arrival of foreign pests in the future. read more

Topics:

Biosecurity (60%)60% related to the paper, Ecotourism (56%)56% related to the paper, Tourism (54%)54% related to the paper

93 Citations

Also popular among researchers

“

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds

Choose a template

Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates

Import a MS-Word file or start fresh

It takes only few seconds to import

View and edit your final output

SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines

Submit directly or Download

Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

Easy support from all your favorite tools

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science citation style.

4. Can I use the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

5. Can I use a manuscript in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

7. Where can I find the template for the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

After writing your paper autoformatting in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour	Archiving policy
Green	Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue	Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow	Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White	Archiving not formally supported

FYI:

Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science are:.

S. No.	Citation Style Type
1.	Author Year
2.	Numbered
3.	Numbered (Superscripted)
4.	Author Year (Cited Pages)
5.	Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science?

16. Can I download New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

“

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

”

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science — Template for authors

Related Journals

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

2.1

0.419

0.847

Insights

Insights

Insights

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Top papers written in this journal

Abstract:

Abstract:

Topics:

Topics:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Topics:

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

Freedom from formatting guidelines

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Frequently asked questions

Fast and reliable, built for complaince.

No word template required

Verifed journal formats

Trusted by academicians

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.