Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format
Recent searches

Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format Example of Science and Engineering Ethics format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Science and Engineering Ethics — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Issues, Ethics and Legal Aspects #2 of 37 up up by 4 ranks
Health (social science) #24 of 293 up up by 26 ranks
Health Policy #26 of 242 up up by 36 ranks
Management of Technology and Innovation #50 of 248 -
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 435 Published Papers | 2175 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 12/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 1.075
SNIP: 1.869
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.3
SJR: 0.537
SNIP: 1.583
open access Open Access

Springer

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.9
SJR: 0.434
SNIP: 1.051
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

BMJ Publishing Group

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.0
SJR: 0.768
SNIP: 1.428

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.787

23% from 2018

Impact factor for Science and Engineering Ethics from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.787
2018 2.275
2017 1.859
2016 2.229
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.0

4% from 2019

CiteRatio for Science and Engineering Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.0
2019 5.2
2018 3.8
2017 3.1
2016 2.8
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 23% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 4% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.73

15% from 2019

SJR for Science and Engineering Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.73
2019 0.86
2018 0.754
2017 0.466
2016 0.44
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.863

10% from 2019

SNIP for Science and Engineering Ethics from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.863
2019 1.692
2018 1.364
2017 1.045
2016 1.1
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 10% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Science and Engineering Ethics

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Science and Engineering Ethics

For the purpose of the journal, science and engineering are defined broadly and include all aspects of human endeavor that seek to increase the range and quality of knowledge and its application to the generation of goods and services that benefit individuals and society as a ...... Read More

Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Health(social science)

Health Policy

Management of Technology and Innovation

Nursing

i
Last updated on
12 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1353-3452
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.117
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11948-009-9142-5
Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges
Nick Bostrom1, Anders Sandberg1

Abstract:

Cognitive enhancement takes many and diverse forms. Various methods of cognitive enhancement have implications for the near future. At the same time, these technologies raise a range of ethical issues. For example, they interact with notions of authenticity, the good life, and the role of medicine in our lives. Present and an... Cognitive enhancement takes many and diverse forms. Various methods of cognitive enhancement have implications for the near future. At the same time, these technologies raise a range of ethical issues. For example, they interact with notions of authenticity, the good life, and the role of medicine in our lives. Present and anticipated methods for cognitive enhancement also create challenges for public policy and regulation. read more read less

Topics:

Human enhancement (55%)55% related to the paper, The good life (51%)51% related to the paper, Neuroenhancement (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
508 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11948-015-9652-2
The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts
Brent Mittelstadt1, Luciano Floridi1

Abstract:

The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and bus... The capacity to collect and analyse data is growing exponentially. Referred to as ‘Big Data’, this scientific, social and technological trend has helped create destabilising amounts of information, which can challenge accepted social and ethical norms. Big Data remains a fuzzy idea, emerging across social, scientific, and business contexts sometimes seemingly related only by the gigantic size of the datasets being considered. As is often the case with the cutting edge of scientific and technological progress, understanding of the ethical implications of Big Data lags behind. In order to bridge such a gap, this article systematically and comprehensively analyses academic literature concerning the ethical implications of Big Data, providing a watershed for future ethical investigations and regulations. Particular attention is paid to biomedical Big Data due to the inherent sensitivity of medical information. By means of a meta-analysis of the literature, a thematic narrative is provided to guide ethicists, data scientists, regulators and other stakeholders through what is already known or hypothesised about the ethical risks of this emerging and innovative phenomenon. Five key areas of concern are identified: (1) informed consent, (2) privacy (including anonymisation and data protection), (3) ownership, (4) epistemology and objectivity, and (5) ‘Big Data Divides’ created between those who have or lack the necessary resources to analyse increasingly large datasets. Critical gaps in the treatment of these themes are identified with suggestions for future research. Six additional areas of concern are then suggested which, although related have not yet attracted extensive debate in the existing literature. It is argued that they will require much closer scrutiny in the immediate future: (6) the dangers of ignoring group-level ethical harms; (7) the importance of epistemology in assessing the ethics of Big Data; (8) the changing nature of fiduciary relationships that become increasingly data saturated; (9) the need to distinguish between ‘academic’ and ‘commercial’ Big Data practices in terms of potential harm to data subjects; (10) future problems with ownership of intellectual property generated from analysis of aggregated datasets; and (11) the difficulty of providing meaningful access rights to individual data subjects that lack necessary resources. Considered together, these eleven themes provide a thorough critical framework to guide ethical assessment and governance of emerging Big Data practices. read more read less

Topics:

Information ethics (55%)55% related to the paper, Big data (55%)55% related to the paper, Data Protection Act 1998 (53%)53% related to the paper, Bioethics (51%)51% related to the paper, Objectivity (science) (50%)50% related to the paper
449 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11948-013-9502-Z
Social Media in Disaster Risk Reduction and Crisis Management
David Alexander1

Abstract:

This paper reviews the actual and potential use of social media in emergency, disaster and crisis situations. This is a field that has generated intense interest. It is characterised by a burgeoning but small and very recent literature. In the emergencies field, social media (blogs, messaging, sites such as Facebook, wikis an... This paper reviews the actual and potential use of social media in emergency, disaster and crisis situations. This is a field that has generated intense interest. It is characterised by a burgeoning but small and very recent literature. In the emergencies field, social media (blogs, messaging, sites such as Facebook, wikis and so on) are used in seven different ways: listening to public debate, monitoring situations, extending emergency response and management, crowd-sourcing and collaborative development, creating social cohesion, furthering causes (including charitable donation) and enhancing research. Appreciation of the positive side of social media is balanced by their potential for negative developments, such as disseminating rumours, undermining authority and promoting terrorist acts. This leads to an examination of the ethics of social media usage in crisis situations. Despite some clearly identifiable risks, for example regarding the violation of privacy, it appears that public consensus on ethics will tend to override unscrupulous attempts to subvert the media. Moreover, social media are a robust means of exposing corruption and malpractice. In synthesis, the widespread adoption and use of social media by members of the public throughout the world heralds a new age in which it is imperative that emergency managers adapt their working practices to the challenge and potential of this development. At the same time, they must heed the ethical warnings and ensure that social media are not abused or misused when crises and emergencies occur. read more read less

Topics:

Social media (61%)61% related to the paper, Emergency management (55%)55% related to the paper, Crisis management (55%)55% related to the paper, Disaster risk reduction (53%)53% related to the paper, Poison control (52%)52% related to the paper
435 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11948-007-9042-5
The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships.
Melissa S. Anderson1, Emily A. Ronning1, Raymond De Vries2, Brian C. Martinson3

Abstract:

Competition among scientists for funding, positions and prestige, among other things, is often seen as a salutary driving force in U.S. science. Its effects on scientists, their work and their relationships are seldom considered. Focus-group discussions with 51 mid- and early-career scientists, on which this study is based, r... Competition among scientists for funding, positions and prestige, among other things, is often seen as a salutary driving force in U.S. science. Its effects on scientists, their work and their relationships are seldom considered. Focus-group discussions with 51 mid- and early-career scientists, on which this study is based, reveal a dark side of competition in science. According to these scientists, com- petition contributes to strategic game-playing in science, a decline in free and open sharing of information and methods, sabotage of others' ability to use one's work, interference with peer-review processes, deformation of relationships, and careless or questionable research conduct. When competition is pervasive, such effects may jeopardize the progress, efficiency and integrity of science. read more read less

Topics:

Competition (economics) (54%)54% related to the paper
299 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S11948-017-9901-7
Artificial Intelligence and the 'Good Society': the US, EU, and UK approach.

Abstract:

In October 2016, the White House, the European Parliament, and the UK House of Commons each issued a report outlining their visions on how to prepare society for the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we provide a comparative assessment of these three reports in order to facilitate the design of ... In October 2016, the White House, the European Parliament, and the UK House of Commons each issued a report outlining their visions on how to prepare society for the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we provide a comparative assessment of these three reports in order to facilitate the design of policies favourable to the development of a ‘good AI society’. To do so, we examine how each report addresses the following three topics: (a) the development of a ‘good AI society’; (b) the role and responsibility of the government, the private sector, and the research community (including academia) in pursuing such a development; and (c) where the recommendations to support such a development may be in need of improvement. Our analysis concludes that the reports address adequately various ethical, social, and economic topics, but come short of providing an overarching political vision and long-term strategy for the development of a ‘good AI society’. In order to contribute to fill this gap, in the conclusion we suggest a two-pronged approach. read more read less

Topics:

Private sector (50%)50% related to the paper, House of Commons (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
298 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Science and Engineering Ethics.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Science and Engineering Ethics format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Science and Engineering Ethics in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Science and Engineering Ethics guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Science and Engineering Ethics guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Science and Engineering Ethics guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Science and Engineering Ethics?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Science and Engineering Ethics citation style.

4. Can I use the Science and Engineering Ethics templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Science and Engineering Ethics.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Science and Engineering Ethics that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Science and Engineering Ethics that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Science and Engineering Ethics?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Science and Engineering Ethics.

7. Where can I find the template for the Science and Engineering Ethics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Science and Engineering Ethics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Science and Engineering Ethics's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Science and Engineering Ethics an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Science and Engineering Ethics is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Science and Engineering Ethics?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Science and Engineering Ethics?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Science and Engineering Ethics?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Science and Engineering Ethics, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Science and Engineering Ethics's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Science and Engineering Ethics?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Science and Engineering Ethics. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Science and Engineering Ethics?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Science and Engineering Ethics are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Science and Engineering Ethics?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Science and Engineering Ethics's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Science and Engineering Ethics in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Science and Engineering Ethics Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Science and Engineering Ethics formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template