Example of Psychologica Belgica format
Recent searches

Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format Example of Psychologica Belgica format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Psychologica Belgica — Template for authors

Publisher: Ubiquity Press
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Psychology (all) #120 of 203 down down by 13 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
Medium
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 84 Published Papers | 133 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 29/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.4
SJR: 2.555
SNIP: 2.574
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.948
SNIP: 0.93
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.1
SJR: 0.83
SNIP: 1.437
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 4.7
SJR: 1.416
SNIP: 1.831

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

0.61

60% from 2018

Impact factor for Psychologica Belgica from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 0.61
2018 1.524
2017 1.03
2016 0.806
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.6

30% from 2019

CiteRatio for Psychologica Belgica from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.6
2019 2.3
2018 1.7
2017 1.6
2016 1.5
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 60% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 30% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.511

7% from 2019

SJR for Psychologica Belgica from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.511
2019 0.55
2018 0.63
2017 0.426
2016 0.357
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

0.671

13% from 2019

SNIP for Psychologica Belgica from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.671
2019 0.772
2018 0.634
2017 0.621
2016 0.507
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Psychologica Belgica

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Ubiquity Press

Psychologica Belgica

Approved by publishing and review experts on SciSpace, this template is built as per for Psychologica Belgica formatting guidelines as mentioned in Ubiquity Press author instructions. The current version was created on 29 Jun 2020 and has been used by 656 authors to write and format their manuscripts to this journal.

Psychology

i
Last updated on
29 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0033-2879
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.599
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
Harvard Ubiquity Custom Citation
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al., 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder, G E, M Tinkham and T M Klapwijk (1982), ‘Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and su- percurrent conversion’, Phys. Rev. B 25(7), 4515–4532. URL: 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article
Quasi-experimentation - design and analysis issues for field settings - cook,td, campbell,dt
01 Jan 1980 - Psychologica Belgica

Topics:

Field (physics) (52%)52% related to the paper
1,631 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.5334/PB-51-1-5
Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)?
Raymond Bruyer1, Marc Brysbaert2
01 Feb 2011 - Psychologica Belgica

Abstract:

Experiments in cognitive psychology usually return two dependent variables: the percentage of errors and the reaction time of the correct responses. Townsend and Ashby (1978, 1983) proposed the inverse efficiency score (IES) as a way to combine both measures and, hence, to provide a better summary of the findings. In this art... Experiments in cognitive psychology usually return two dependent variables: the percentage of errors and the reaction time of the correct responses. Townsend and Ashby (1978, 1983) proposed the inverse efficiency score (IES) as a way to combine both measures and, hence, to provide a better summary of the findings. In this article we examine the usefulness of IES by applying it to existing datasets. Although IES does give a better summary of the findings in some cases, mostly the variance of the measure is increased to such an extent that it becomes less interesting. Against our initial hopes, we have to conclude that it is not a good idea to limit the statistical analyses to IES without further checking the data. read more read less
View PDF
393 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.5334/PB-47-4-235
Measuring empathic tendencies : reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the interpersonal reactivity index
Kim De Corte1, Ann Buysse2, Lesley Verhofstadt2, Herbert Roeyers2, Koen Ponnet3, Mark H. Davis4
01 Oct 2007 - Psychologica Belgica

Abstract:

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1980) is a commonly used self-report instrument designed to assess empathic tendencies. The IRI consists of four separate subscales: Perspective Taking (PT), Fantasy (FS), Empathic Concern (EC), and Personal Distress (PD). The objective of this study was to examine the psychomet... The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1980) is a commonly used self-report instrument designed to assess empathic tendencies. The IRI consists of four separate subscales: Perspective Taking (PT), Fantasy (FS), Empathic Concern (EC), and Personal Distress (PD). The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the IRI. The IRI was administered to a Dutch sample of 651 normal functioning adults. The factor structure of the IRI was examined by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results of the CFA revealed that there is room for improvement and modification of the original theoretical model. The validity of the IRI was tested using internal criteria (i. e., scale intercorrelations) and external criteria (i. e., correlations with subscales of the EQ-i (Bar-On, 1997), the NEO-FFI (Hoekstra, Ormel, & De Fruyt, 1996), Mach-IV (Van Kenhove, Vermeir, & Verniers, 2001), Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), and the WAIS-III (Wechsler, 2000)). Overall, the internal consistency, construct validity, and factor structure of scores from the Dutch version of the IRI suggest that it is a useful instrument to measure people's self-reported empathic tendencies. read more read less

Topics:

Confirmatory factor analysis (53%)53% related to the paper, Construct validity (53%)53% related to the paper, Test validity (52%)52% related to the paper
View PDF
281 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.5334/PB-50-3-4-245
Does working memory training generalize
Zach Shipstead1, Thomas S. Redick1, Randall W. Engle1
01 Oct 2010 - Psychologica Belgica

Abstract:

Recently, attempts have been made to alter the capacity of working memory (WMC) through extensive practice on adaptive working memory tasks that adjust difficulty in response to user performance We discuss the design criteria required to claim validity as well as generalizability and how recent studies do or do not satisfy th... Recently, attempts have been made to alter the capacity of working memory (WMC) through extensive practice on adaptive working memory tasks that adjust difficulty in response to user performance We discuss the design criteria required to claim validity as well as generalizability and how recent studies do or do not satisfy those criteria It is concluded that, as of yet, the results are inconsistent and this is likely driven by inadequate controls and ineffective measurement of the cognitive abilities of interest read more read less

Topics:

Working memory training (74%)74% related to the paper, Working memory (64%)64% related to the paper, Short-term memory (64%)64% related to the paper, Cognition (63%)63% related to the paper, Generalizability theory (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
250 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.5334/PB.986
Exploring the causes of comparative optimism.
01 Jan 2002 - Psychologica Belgica

Abstract:

We review explanations offered by researchers for optimism in comparative risk judgments – the belief that one is at lower risk than other people for negative events. Our review organizes the explanations into four categories. The categories reflect a) the desired end-states of comparative judgments, b) the cognitive processe... We review explanations offered by researchers for optimism in comparative risk judgments – the belief that one is at lower risk than other people for negative events. Our review organizes the explanations into four categories. The categories reflect a) the desired end-states of comparative judgments, b) the cognitive processes that guide judgments, c) the information people have or use in making judgments, and d) the underlying affect. For each explanation we review relevant studies. We conclude by discussing whether comparative optimism reflects a distortion in personal risk judgments or judgments of the average person’s risk, by addressing the interplay of the various accounts of comparative optimism, and by discussing directions for future research. Psychics and astrologers sustain a steady business by appealing to people’s desire to predict the future. People want to know whether they will be lucky in love or at risk for cancer or other debilitating illnesses. Yet people are not just interested in how their future will unfold in an absolute sense; they are interested in knowing how their future will compare with that of other people, and for good reason. In a variety of domains (sports competitions, admissions to competitive graduate schools, job promotions), success and failure are defined by how people measure up to others because those others provide a standard against which people can evaluate themselves (Festinger, 1954). Of course, the future is uncertain, and unlike psychics and astrologers, laypeople lack a crystal ball for predicting what lies ahead. They must instead weigh their knowledge of themselves and their knowledge of others to forecast the future. Importantly, over two decades of research on comparative risk judgments suggest that people systematically tip the scale in their own favor, predicting their outcomes will be brighter than that of their peers. Comparative optimism refers to the tendency for people to believe that they are less likely to experience negative read more read less

Topics:

Optimism (52%)52% related to the paper, Risk perception (51%)51% related to the paper, Social comparison theory (51%)51% related to the paper
View PDF
195 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Psychologica Belgica.

It automatically formats your research paper to Ubiquity Press formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Psychologica Belgica format uses Harvard Ubiquity Custom Citation citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Psychologica Belgica in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Psychologica Belgica guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Psychologica Belgica guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Psychologica Belgica guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Psychologica Belgica?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Psychologica Belgica citation style.

4. Can I use the Psychologica Belgica templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Psychologica Belgica.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Psychologica Belgica that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Psychologica Belgica that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Psychologica Belgica?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Psychologica Belgica.

7. Where can I find the template for the Psychologica Belgica?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Psychologica Belgica's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Psychologica Belgica's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Psychologica Belgica an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Psychologica Belgica is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Psychologica Belgica?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Psychologica Belgica?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Psychologica Belgica?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Psychologica Belgica, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Psychologica Belgica's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Psychologica Belgica?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Psychologica Belgica. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Psychologica Belgica?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Psychologica Belgica are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Psychologica Belgica?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Psychologica Belgica's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Psychologica Belgica in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Psychologica Belgica Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Psychologica Belgica formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template