Institution
MDRC
Nonprofit•New York, New York, United States•
About: MDRC is a nonprofit organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Welfare & Randomized controlled trial. The organization has 237 authors who have published 367 publications receiving 10799 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This article developed empirical benchmarks of comparison that reflect the nature of the intervention being evaluated, its target population, and the outcome measure or measures being used to assess effect size measures for educational interventions designed to improve student academic achievement.
Abstract: There is no universal guideline or rule of thumb for judging the practical importance or substantive significance of a standardized effect size estimate for an intervention. Instead, one must develop empirical benchmarks of comparison that reflect the nature of the intervention being evaluated, its target population, and the outcome measure or measures being used. This approach is applied to the assessment of effect size measures for educational interventions designed to improve student academic achievement. Three types of empirical benchmarks are illustrated: (a) normative expectations for growth over time in student achievement, (b) policy-relevant gaps in student achievement by demographic group or school performance, and (c) effect size results from past research for similar interventions and target populations. The findings can be used to help assess educational interventions, and the process of doing so can provide guidelines for how to develop and use such benchmarks in other fields.
855 citations
••
TL;DR: A strong base of research is needed to guide investments in teacher professional development (PD) and articulates a particular direction for future work as mentioned in this paper. But little is known about whether PD can have a positive impact on achievement when a program is delivered across a range of typical settings and when its delivery depends on multiple trainers.
Abstract: A strong base of research is needed to guide investments in teacher professional development (PD). This article considers the status of research on PD and articulates a particular direction for future work. Little is known about whether PD can have a positive impact on achievement when a program is delivered across a range of typical settings and when its delivery depends on multiple trainers. Despite a consensus in the literature on the features of effective PD, there is limited evidence on the specific features that make a difference for achievement. This article explains the benefits offered by experiments in addressing current research needs and—for those conducting and interpreting such studies—discusses the unique methodological issues encountered when experimental methods are applied to the study of PD.
582 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, two complementary approaches to developing empirical benchmarks for achievement effect sizes in educational interventions are explored, characterizing the natural developmental progress in achievement made by students from one year to the next as effect sizes.
Abstract: Two complementary approaches to developing empirical benchmarks for achievement effect sizes in educational interventions are explored. The first approach characterizes the natural developmental progress in achievement made by students from one year to the next as effect sizes. Data for seven nationally standardized achievement tests show large annual gains in the early elementary grades followed by gradually declining gains in later grades. A given intervention effect will therefore look quite different when compared to the annual progress for different grade levels. The second approach explores achievement gaps for policy-relevant subgroups of students or schools. Data from national- and district-level achievement tests show that, when represented as effect sizes, student gaps are relatively small for gender and much larger for economic disadvantage and race/ethnicity. For schools, the differences between weak schools and average schools are surprisingly modest when expressed as student-level e...
362 citations
••
MDRC1
TL;DR: Brock as discussed by the authors reviewed systematic research findings on the effectiveness of various inter-ventions designed to help at-risk students remain in college and pointed out that students at two-year colleges are far less likely than those at four-year institutions to complete a degree.
Abstract: Summary Although access to higher education has increased substantially over the past forty years, student success in college—as measured by persistence and degree attainment—has not improved at all. Thomas Brock reviews systematic research findings on the effectiveness of various inter ventions designed to help at-risk students remain in college. Brock shows how changes in federal policy and public attitudes since the mid-1960s have opened up higher education to women, minorities, and nontraditional students and also shifted the “center of gravity” in higher education away from traditional four-year colleges toward nonselective community colleges. Students at two-year colleges, however, are far less likely than those at four-year institutions to complete a degree. Brock argues that the nation’s higher education system must do much more to promote student success. Three areas, he says, are particularly ripe for reform: remedial education, student support services, and financial aid. In each of these three areas, Brock reviews programs and interventions that community colleges have undertaken in order to raise completion rates. Some colleges have, for example, experimented with remedial programs that build social cohesion between students and faculty and integrate content across courses. Other colleges have tested student support service programs that offer counseling and advising that are regular, intensive, and personalized. Still others have experimented with ways to simplify the financial aid application process and incen tivize students to earn good grades and persist in school. Research shows that such programs and interventions can improve student outcomes, but Brock argues that more must be done to bring proven practices to scale and to test new ideas that might lead to better results. Institutions that most need help are those that provide the greatest access to nontraditional and underprepared students in community colleges and less selective universities.
333 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper found that academic achievement gaps between high and low-income students born in the 1990s were much larger than between cohorts born two decades earlier, and that racial/ethnic achievement gaps declined during the same period.
Abstract: Academic achievement gaps between high- and low-income students born in the 1990s were much larger than between cohorts born two decades earlier. Racial/ethnic achievement gaps declined during the ...
273 citations
Authors
Showing all 239 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Stephen W. Raudenbush | 75 | 164 | 58482 |
Pradipta Kishore Dash | 51 | 316 | 9035 |
Norbert Schmitz | 50 | 265 | 8738 |
Lisa A. Gennetian | 37 | 123 | 5761 |
Howard S. Bloom | 36 | 80 | 5015 |
Pamela Morris | 36 | 140 | 14237 |
Jean Baldwin Grossman | 27 | 60 | 4378 |
Sue Kim | 27 | 146 | 3377 |
Charles Michalopoulos | 26 | 68 | 2750 |
Pei Zhu | 25 | 70 | 2498 |
May Faraj | 22 | 53 | 2561 |
Julie L. Lavoie | 22 | 53 | 2057 |
Dan Bloom | 22 | 44 | 1529 |
James J. Kemple | 21 | 48 | 2183 |
Susan Scrivener | 18 | 30 | 1030 |