Institution
Medical University of South Carolina
Education•Charleston, South Carolina, United States•
About: Medical University of South Carolina is a education organization based out in Charleston, South Carolina, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 23436 authors who have published 45440 publications receiving 1769397 citations. The organization is also known as: MUSC & Medical College of the State of South Carolina.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Medicine, Cancer, Stroke
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Columbia University1, University of Miami2, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill3, SUNY Downstate Medical Center4, University College London5, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust6, University of California, San Francisco7, University of California, Los Angeles8, University of Alabama at Birmingham9, Rio de Janeiro State University10, University of Guadalajara11, University of Düsseldorf12, New York University13, University of Barcelona14, Shanghai Jiao Tong University15, University of Lisbon16, Stellenbosch University17, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust18, Oregon Health & Science University19, University of Padua20, University of Leeds21, North Shore-LIJ Health System22, Northwestern University23, Medical University of South Carolina24, University of Birmingham25, Sun Yat-sen University26, Lille University of Science and Technology27, Charité28, Rutgers University29, Federal University of São Paulo30, University of Debrecen31, Imperial College London32, Emory University33, University of Liège34, University of Pittsburgh35, University of Paris36, University of the Witwatersrand37, California State University, Long Beach38, Royal Melbourne Hospital39, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center40, Autonomous University of Barcelona41, Pennsylvania State University42, Johns Hopkins University43, University of Szeged44, Duke University45, University of Colorado Denver46, Harvard University47, University of Cape Town48, University of Malaya49, Peking Union Medical College50
TL;DR: Although most patients in both treatment groups experienced clinical improvement, the study did not meet its primary objective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.
Abstract: Recent studies have suggested that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may offer advantages over intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis, but these therapies have not been compared in an international randomized, controlled trial. Here, we report the comparison of MMF and IVC as induction treatment for active lupus nephritis in a multinational, two-phase (induction and maintenance) study. We randomly assigned 370 patients with classes III through V lupus nephritis to open-label MMF (target dosage 3 g/d) or IVC (0.5 to 1.0 g/m(2) in monthly pulses) in a 24-wk induction study. Both groups received prednisone, tapered from a maximum starting dosage of 60 mg/d. The primary end point was a prespecified decrease in urine protein/creatinine ratio and stabilization or improvement in serum creatinine. Secondary end points included complete renal remission, systemic disease activity and damage, and safety. Overall, we did not detect a significantly different response rate between the two groups: 104 (56.2%) of 185 patients responded to MMF compared with 98 (53.0%) of 185 to IVC. Secondary end points were also similar between treatment groups. There were nine deaths in the MMF group and five in the IVC group. We did not detect significant differences between the MMF and IVC groups with regard to rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, or infections. Although most patients in both treatment groups experienced clinical improvement, the study did not meet its primary objective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.
909 citations
••
University of California, Irvine1, Massachusetts Institute of Technology2, University of California, Los Angeles3, University of Pennsylvania4, University of Southern California5, National Institutes of Health6, Oregon Health & Science University7, University of Rochester8, Georgetown University9, University of Washington10, Medical University of South Carolina11, University of Lethbridge12, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign13, Emory University14, University of California, San Francisco15, Harvard University16, University of Michigan17, Cornell University18, University of Colorado Boulder19, Stanford University20
TL;DR: Integration of information across disciplines should enhance opportunities for the translation of neuroplasticity and circuit retraining research into effective clinical therapies.
Abstract: Neuroplasticity can be defined as the ability of the nervous system to respond to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, function and connections. Major advances in the understanding of neuroplasticity have to date yielded few established interventions. To advance the translation of neuroplasticity research towards clinical applications, the National Institutes of Health Blueprint for Neuroscience Research sponsored a workshop in 2009. Basic and clinical researchers in disciplines from central nervous system injury/stroke, mental/addictive disorders, paediatric/developmental disorders and neurodegeneration/ageing identified cardinal examples of neuroplasticity, underlying mechanisms, therapeutic implications and common denominators. Promising therapies that may enhance training-induced cognitive and motor learning, such as brain stimulation and neuropharmacological interventions, were identified, along with questions of how best to use this body of information to reduce human disability. Improved understanding of adaptive mechanisms at every level, from molecules to synapses, to networks, to behaviour, can be gained from iterative collaborations between basic and clinical researchers. Lessons can be gleaned from studying fields related to plasticity, such as development, critical periods, learning and response to disease. Improved means of assessing neuroplasticity in humans, including biomarkers for predicting and monitoring treatment response, are needed. Neuroplasticity occurs with many variations, in many forms, and in many contexts. However, common themes in plasticity that emerge across diverse central nervous system conditions include experience dependence, time sensitivity and the importance of motivation and attention. Integration of information across disciplines should enhance opportunities for the translation of neuroplasticity and circuit retraining research into effective clinical therapies.
907 citations
••
University of California, San Diego1, Mayo Clinic2, New York University3, Georgetown University4, Rush University Medical Center5, University of Michigan6, Baylor College of Medicine7, Oregon Health & Science University8, Columbia University9, Eli Lilly and Company10, McGill University11, University of California, Irvine12, Yale University13, Medical University of South Carolina14, University of Alabama at Birmingham15, Brown University16
TL;DR: Patients with MCI had a predominant memory impairment with relative sparing of other cognitive domains and were intermediate between clinically normal individuals and patients with AD on cognitive and functional ratings.
Abstract: Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) represents a transitional state between the cognitive changes of normal aging and very early dementia and is becoming increasingly recognized as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD). The Memory Impairment Study (MIS) is a multicenter clinical trial in patients with MCI designed to evaluate whether vitamin E or donepezil is effective at delaying the time to a clinical diagnosis of AD. Objective To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with MCI recruited for the MIS and compare them with those of elderly controls and patients with AD in another clinical trial. Design Descriptive and comparative study of patients with MCI participating in a multicenter clinical trial. Setting Memory disorder centers in the United States and Canada. Patients A total of 769 patients with MCI, 107 cognitively normal elderly controls, 122 patients with very mild AD (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] 0.5), and 183 patients with mild AD (CDR 1.0) were evaluated. Patients in the MIS met operational criteria for amnestic MCI. Controls were recruited in parallel with the MCI group, underwent the same assessments, and had a CDR of 0. Main Outcome Measures Clinical, neuropsychologic, functional, neuroimaging, and genetic measures. Results Mean ± SD Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale scores were 5.6 ± 3.3 for controls, 11.3 ± 4.4 for patients with MCI, 18.0 ± 6.2 for the AD CDR 0.5 group, and 25.2 ± 8.8 for the AD CDR 1.0 group. Compared with controls, patients with MCI were most impaired on memory tasks, with less severe impairments in other cognitive domains. Patients with MCI were more likely than controls but less likely than patients with AD to carry the apolipoprotein E ϵ4 allele. Patients with MCI had hippocampal volumes that were intermediate between those of controls and patients with AD. Conclusions Patients with MCI had a predominant memory impairment with relative sparing of other cognitive domains and were intermediate between clinically normal individuals and patients with AD on cognitive and functional ratings. These results demonstrate the successful implementation of operational criteria for this unique group of at-risk patients in a multicenter clinical trial.
891 citations
••
TL;DR: It is shown that P. gingivalis, at very low colonization levels, triggers changes to the amount and composition of the oral commensal microbiota leading to inflammatory periodontal bone loss, demonstrating that a single, low-abundance species can disrupt host-microbial homeostasis to cause inflammatory disease.
890 citations
••
TL;DR: Dopamine release in the dPFC initiates a dP FC–NAcore–VP series circuit that mediates cocaine-induced drug-seeking behavior, and is demonstrated to be specific to drug-related reinstatement.
Abstract: The role of limbic-striato-pallidal circuitry in cocaine-induced reinstatement was evaluated. The transient inhibition of brain nuclei associated with motor systems [including the ventral tegmental area (VTA), dorsal prefrontal cortex (dPFC), core of the nucleus accumbens (NAcore), and ventral pallidum (VP)] prevented cocaine-induced reinstatement. However, only the VP proved to be necessary for food reinstatement, suggesting that the identified circuit is specific to drug-related reinstatement. Supporting the possibility that the VTA–dPFC–NAcore–VP is a series circuit mediating reinstatement, simultaneous unilateral microinjection of GABA agonists into the dPFC in one hemisphere and into the VP in the contralateral hemisphere abolished cocaine reinstatement. Although dopamine projections from the VTA innervate all three forebrain nuclei, the blockade of dopamine receptors only in the dPFC antagonized cocaine-induced reinstatement. Furthermore, DA administration into the dPFC was sufficient to elicit a reinstatement in drug-related responding. These data demonstrate that dopamine release in the dPFC initiates a dPFC–NAcore–VP series circuit that mediates cocaine-induced drug-seeking behavior.
889 citations
Authors
Showing all 23601 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Edward Giovannucci | 206 | 1671 | 179875 |
Ronald Klein | 194 | 1305 | 149140 |
Peter W.F. Wilson | 181 | 680 | 139852 |
Yusuke Nakamura | 179 | 2076 | 160313 |
John J.V. McMurray | 178 | 1389 | 184502 |
Nora D. Volkow | 165 | 958 | 107463 |
L. Joseph Melton | 161 | 531 | 97861 |
Gregg C. Fonarow | 161 | 1676 | 126516 |
Michael Boehnke | 152 | 511 | 136681 |
Charles B. Nemeroff | 149 | 979 | 90426 |
Deepak L. Bhatt | 149 | 1973 | 114652 |
Clifford R. Jack | 140 | 965 | 94814 |
Scott D. Solomon | 137 | 1145 | 103041 |
Karl Swedberg | 136 | 706 | 111214 |
Charles J. Yeo | 136 | 672 | 76424 |