scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

University of Porto

EducationPorto, Portugal
About: University of Porto is a education organization based out in Porto, Portugal. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 20807 authors who have published 64514 publications receiving 1557882 citations. The organization is also known as: U.Porto & Universidade do Porto.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Sebastián F. Sánchez1, Robert C. Kennicutt2, A. Gil de Paz3, G. van de Ven4, José M. Vílchez1, Lutz Wisotzki5, C. J. Walcher5, D. Mast1, J. A. L. Aguerri1, J. A. L. Aguerri6, Sergio Albiol-Pérez7, Almudena Alonso-Herrero1, João Alves8, J. Bakos6, J. Bakos1, T. Bartakova9, Joss Bland-Hawthorn10, Alessandro Boselli11, D. J. Bomans12, África Castillo-Morales3, C. Cortijo-Ferrero1, A. de Lorenzo-Cáceres6, A. de Lorenzo-Cáceres1, A. del Olmo1, Ralf-Jürgen Dettmar12, Angeles I. Díaz13, Simon Ellis14, Simon Ellis10, Jesús Falcón-Barroso6, Jesús Falcón-Barroso1, Hector Flores15, Anna Gallazzi16, Begoña García-Lorenzo6, Begoña García-Lorenzo1, R. M. González Delgado1, Nicolas Gruel, Tim Haines17, C. Hao18, Bernd Husemann5, J. Iglesias-Páramo1, Knud Jahnke4, Benjamin D. Johnson19, Bruno Jungwiert20, Bruno Jungwiert21, Veselina Kalinova4, C. Kehrig5, D. Kupko5, Angel R. Lopez-Sanchez22, Angel R. Lopez-Sanchez14, Mariya Lyubenova4, R. A. Marino3, R. A. Marino1, E. Mármol-Queraltó1, E. Mármol-Queraltó3, I. Márquez1, J. Masegosa1, Sharon E. Meidt4, Jairo Méndez-Abreu1, Jairo Méndez-Abreu6, Ana Monreal-Ibero1, C. Montijo1, A. Mourao23, G. Palacios-Navarro7, Polychronis Papaderos24, Anna Pasquali25, Reynier Peletier, Enrique Pérez1, I. Pérez26, Andreas Quirrenbach, M. Relaño26, F. F. Rosales-Ortega1, F. F. Rosales-Ortega13, Martin Roth5, T. Ruiz-Lara26, Patricia Sanchez-Blazquez13, C. Sengupta1, R. Singh4, Vallery Stanishev23, Scott Trager27, Alexandre Vazdekis6, Alexandre Vazdekis1, Kerttu Viironen1, Vivienne Wild28, Stefano Zibetti16, Bodo L. Ziegler8 
TL;DR: The Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey as discussed by the authors was designed to provide a first step in this direction by obtaining spatially resolved spectroscopic information of a diameter selected sample of similar to 600 galaxies in the Local Universe.
Abstract: The final product of galaxy evolution through cosmic time is the population of galaxies in the local universe. These galaxies are also those that can be studied in most detail, thus providing a stringent benchmark for our understanding of galaxy evolution. Through the huge success of spectroscopic single-fiber, statistical surveys of the Local Universe in the last decade, it has become clear, however, that an authoritative observational description of galaxies will involve measuring their spatially resolved properties over their full optical extent for a statistically significant sample. We present here the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey, which has been designed to provide a first step in this direction. We summarize the survey goals and design, including sample selection and observational strategy. We also showcase the data taken during the first observing runs (June/July 2010) and outline the reduction pipeline, quality control schemes and general characteristics of the reduced data. This survey is obtaining spatially resolved spectroscopic information of a diameter selected sample of similar to 600 galaxies in the Local Universe (0.005 < z < 0.03). CALIFA has been designed to allow the building of two-dimensional maps of the following quantities: (a) stellar populations: ages and metallicities; (b) ionized gas: distribution, excitation mechanism and chemical abundances; and (c) kinematic properties: both from stellar and ionized gas components. CALIFA uses the PPAK integral field unit (IFU), with a hexagonal field-of-view of similar to 1.3 square', with a 100% covering factor by adopting a three-pointing dithering scheme. The optical wavelength range is covered from 3700 to 7000 angstrom, using two overlapping setups (V500 and V1200), with different resolutions: R similar to 850 and R similar to 1650, respectively. CALIFA is a legacy survey, intended for the community. The reduced data will be released, once the quality has been guaranteed. The analyzed data fulfill the expectations of the original observing proposal, on the basis of a set of quality checks and exploratory analysis: (i) the final datacubes reach a 3 sigma limiting surface brightness depth of similar to 23.0 mag/arcsec(2) for the V500 grating data (similar to 22.8 mag/arcsec(2) for V1200); (ii) about similar to 70% of the covered field-of-view is above this 3 sigma limit; (iii) the data have a blue-to-red relative flux calibration within a few percent in most of the wavelength range; (iv) the absolute flux calibration is accurate within similar to 8% with respect to SDSS; (v) the measured spectral resolution is similar to 85 km s(-1) for V1200 (similar to 150 km s(-1) for V500); (vi) the estimated accuracy of the wavelength calibration is similar to 5 km s(-1) for the V1200 data (similar to 10 km s(-1) for the V500 data); (vii) the aperture matched CALIFA and SDSS spectra are qualitatively and quantitatively similar. Finally, we show that we are able to carry out all measurements indicated above, recovering the properties of the stellar populations, the ionized gas and the kinematics of both components. The associated maps illustrate the spatial variation of these parameters across the field, reemphasizing the redshift dependence of single aperture spectroscopic measurements. We conclude from this first look at the data that CALIFA will be an important resource for archaeological studies of galaxies in the Local Universe.

1,143 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This Review summarizes the main processes and new mechanisms involved in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche and describes the main mechanisms used to modify organs of future metastasis.
Abstract: It is well established that organs of future metastasis are not passive receivers of circulating tumour cells, but are instead selectively and actively modified by the primary tumour before metastatic spread has even occurred. Sowing the 'seeds' of metastasis requires the action of tumour-secreted factors and tumour-shed extracellular vesicles that enable the 'soil' at distant metastatic sites to encourage the outgrowth of incoming cancer cells. In this Review, we summarize the main processes and new mechanisms involved in the formation of the pre-metastatic niche.

1,134 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Brian Yanny1, Constance M. Rockosi2, Heidi Jo Newberg3, Gillian R. Knapp4, Jennifer K. Adelman-McCarthy1, Bonnie Alcorn1, S. Allam1, Carlos Allende Prieto5, Carlos Allende Prieto6, Deokkeun An7, K. S. J. Anderson8, K. S. J. Anderson9, Scott F. Anderson10, Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones11, Steve Bastian1, Timothy C. Beers12, Eric F. Bell11, Vasily Belokurov13, Dmitry Bizyaev8, Norm Blythe8, John J. Bochanski10, William N. Boroski1, Jarle Brinchmann14, J. Brinkmann8, Howard Brewington8, Larry N. Carey10, Kyle M. Cudworth15, Michael L. Evans10, Nick Evans13, Evalyn Gates15, Boris T. Gänsicke16, Bruce Gillespie8, G. F. Gilmore13, Ada Nebot Gomez-Moran, Eva K. Grebel17, Jim Greenwell10, James E. Gunn4, Cathy Jordan8, Wendell Jordan8, Paul Harding18, Hugh C. Harris, John S. Hendry1, Diana Holder8, Inese I. Ivans4, Željko Ivezić10, Sebastian Jester11, Jennifer A. Johnson7, Stephen M. Kent1, S. J. Kleinman8, Alexei Y. Kniazev11, Jurek Krzesinski8, Richard G. Kron15, Nikolay Kuropatkin1, Svetlana Lebedeva1, Young Sun Lee12, R. French Leger1, Sébastien Lépine19, Steve Levine, Huan Lin1, Dan Long8, Craig P. Loomis4, Robert H. Lupton4, O. Malanushenko8, Viktor Malanushenko8, Bruce Margon2, David Martínez-Delgado11, P. M. McGehee20, Dave Monet, Heather L. Morrison18, Jeffrey A. Munn, Eric H. Neilsen1, Atsuko Nitta8, John E. Norris21, Daniel Oravetz8, Russell Owen10, Nikhil Padmanabhan22, Kaike Pan8, R. S. Peterson1, Jeffrey R. Pier, Jared Platson1, Paola Re Fiorentin23, Paola Re Fiorentin11, Gordon T. Richards24, Hans-Walter Rix11, David J. Schlegel22, Donald P. Schneider25, Matthias R. Schreiber26, Axel Schwope, Valena C. Sibley1, Audrey Simmons8, Stephanie A. Snedden8, J. Allyn Smith27, Larry Stark10, Fritz Stauffer8, Matthias Steinmetz, Christopher Stoughton1, Mark SubbaRao28, Mark SubbaRao15, Alexander S. Szalay29, Paula Szkody10, Aniruddha R. Thakar29, Sivarani Thirupathi12, Douglas L. Tucker1, A. Uomoto30, Daniel E. Vanden Berk25, S. Vidrih17, Yogesh Wadadekar31, Yogesh Wadadekar4, S. Watters8, R. Wilhelm32, Rosemary F. G. Wyse29, Jean Yarger8, Daniel B. Zucker13 
TL;DR: The Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SEGUE) Survey as mentioned in this paper obtained approximately 240,000 moderate-resolution spectra from 3900 to 9000 of fainter Milky Way stars (14.0 10 per resolution element).
Abstract: The Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SEGUE) Survey obtained {approx}240,000 moderate-resolution (R {approx} 1800) spectra from 3900 {angstrom} to 9000 {angstrom} of fainter Milky Way stars (14.0 10 per resolution element, stellar atmospheric parameters are estimated, including metallicity, surface gravity, and effective temperature. SEGUE obtained 3500 deg{sup 2} of additional ugriz imaging (primarily at low Galactic latitudes) providing precise multicolor photometry ({sigma}(g, r, i) {approx} 2%), ({sigma}(u, z) {approx} 3%) and astrometry ({approx}0.1) for spectroscopic target selection. The stellar spectra, imaging data, and derived parameter catalogs for this survey are publicly available as part of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7.

1,133 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This work presents LOSITAN, a selection detection workbench based on a well evaluated Fst-outlier detection method that greatly facilitates correct approximation of model parameters, provides data import and export functions, iterative contour smoothing and generation of graphics in a easy to use graphical user interface.
Abstract: Testing for selection is becoming one of the most important steps in the analysis of multilocus population genetics data sets. Existing applications are difficult to use, leaving many non-trivial, error-prone tasks to the user. Here we present LOSITAN, a selection detection workbench based on a well evaluated F st -outlier detection method. LOSITAN greatly facilitates correct approximation of model parameters (e.g., genome-wide average, neutral F st ), provides data import and export functions, iterative contour smoothing and generation of graphics in a easy to use graphical user interface. LOSITAN is able to use modern multi-core processor architectures by locally parallelizing fdist, reducing computation time by half in current dual core machines and with almost linear performance gains in machines with more cores. LOSITAN makes selection detection feasible to a much wider range of users, even for large population genomic datasets, by both providing an easy to use interface and essential functionality to complete the whole selection detection process.

1,121 citations


Authors

Showing all 21379 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Stephen J. O'Brien153106293025
Marco Costa1461458105096
António Amorim136147796519
Nuno Filipe Castro12896076945
João Carvalho126127877017
Carlos Caldas12254773840
Jorge S. Reis-Filho12159056695
Graca Rocha11831284236
George C Patton11857894634
Rui L. Reis115160863223
Nuno C. Santos11488547038
Carlo La Vecchia112126556282
Henrik Clausen10952049820
Francisco A. Tomás-Barberán10638936505
Banglin Chen10539355287
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

93% related

Ghent University
111K papers, 3.7M citations

92% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

92% related

Spanish National Research Council
220.4K papers, 7.6M citations

92% related

University of Barcelona
108.5K papers, 3.7M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023156
2022853
20216,085
20205,746
20195,134
20184,597