scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0958-9287

Journal of European Social Policy 

SAGE Publishing
About: Journal of European Social Policy is an academic journal published by SAGE Publishing. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Welfare state & Social policy. It has an ISSN identifier of 0958-9287. Over the lifetime, 897 publications have been published receiving 46731 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify some common traits of the welfare states of Italy, Spain, Por tugal and Greece, with special attention to in stitutional and political aspects, and propose a model to compare them.
Abstract: This article tries to identify some common traits of the welfare states of Italy, Spain, Por tugal and Greece, with special attention to in stitutional and political aspects.

2,588 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The idea of the male-breadwinner family model has served historically to cut across established typologies of welfare regimes, and further that the model has been modified in different ways and to different degrees in particular countries as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: This paper builds on the idea that any further development of the concept of 'welfare regime' must incorporate the relationship between unpaid as well as paid work and welfare. Consideration of the privateldomestic is crucial to a gendered understanding of welfare because historically women have typically gained entitlements by virtue of their dependent status within the family as wives and mothers. The paper suggests that the idea of the male-breadwinner family model has served historically to cut across established typologies of welfare regimes, and further that the model has been modified in different ways and to different degrees in particular countries.

1,960 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors surveys the debate regarding Esping-Andersen's typology of welfare states and reviews the modified or alternative typologies ensuing from this debate and confine themselves to the classif...
Abstract: This paper surveys the debate regarding Esping-Andersen's typology of welfare states and reviews the modified or alternative typologies ensuing from this debate. We confine ourselves to the classif...

1,120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors examined European public perceptions of the relative deservingness of four needy groups (elderly people, sick and disabled people, unemployed people, and immigrants) using data from the 1999/2000 European Values Study survey.
Abstract: Summary Welfare states treat different groups of needy people differently. Such differential rationing may reflect various considerations of policymakers, who act in economic, political and cultural contexts. This article aims at contributing to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the popular cultural context of welfare rationing. It examines European public perceptions of the relative deservingness of four needy groups (elderly people, sick and disabled people, unemployed people, and immigrants). Hypotheses, deduced from a literature review, are tested against data from the 1999/2000 European Values Study survey. It is found that Europeans share a common and fundamental deservingness culture: across countries and social categories there is a consistent pattern that elderly people are seen as most deserving, closely followed by sick and disabled people; unemployed people are seen as less deserving still, and immigrants as least deserving of all. Conditionality is greater in poorer countries, in countries with lower unemployment, and in countries where people have less trust in fellow citizens and in state institutions. At the national level there is no relation with welfare regime type or welfare spending. Individual differences in conditionality are determined by several socio-demographic and attitudinal characteristics, as well as by certain features of the country people live in.

836 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, social care services are defined as a specific way of increasing the autonomy of both care pro viders and care receivers, and they represent an expanding component of the welfare state; they are important for women; and there are major differences between different countries in social care.
Abstract: The purpose of this article is to bring social care services into the domain of comparative social policy research. The reason why it is important for social care services to be incor porated into the debate is that they represent an expanding component of the welfare state; that they are important for women; and that there are major differences between different countries in social care services. We have defined social care services as a specific way of increasing the autonomy of both care pro viders and care receivers.

605 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202315
202246
202141
202041
201946
201835