Journal•ISSN: 0079-1636
Transactions of the Philological Society
Wiley-Blackwell
About: Transactions of the Philological Society is an academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Old English & Verb. It has an ISSN identifier of 0079-1636. Over the lifetime, 867 publications have been published receiving 9432 citations. The journal is also known as: Philological Society. Transactions.
Topics: Old English, Verb, Phonology, Linguistics, Celtic languages
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: An attempt to recover the first-order subgrouping of the Indo-European family using a new computational method devised by the authors and based on a ‘perfect phylogeny’ algorithm is reported.
Abstract: This paper reports the results of an attempt to recover the first-order subgrouping of the Indo-European family using a new computational method devised by the authors and based on a ‘perfect phylogeny’ algorithm. The methodology is also briefly described, and points of theory and methodology are addressed in connection with the experiment whose results are here reported.
267 citations
••
TL;DR: Evidence is presented from online processing of English by thirty Chinese-speaking, twenty-eight Japanese-speaking and forty-six Spanish-speaking participants which shows that the basic mechanisms of grammar remain intact for L2 learners in spite of inferior performance on judgements of those same sentences.
Abstract: Current theories of morphosyntax propose that features play a key role in determining some aspects of word order and in the argument structure of verbs. Thus, knowledge of language consists of features and mechanisms that ensure that elements in a clause are assembled correctly for interpretation and phonological processing. Therefore, the nature of the grammar of an L2 can be explored by assessing whether features and the mechanisms through which they are assembled and checked is ‘impaired’ or not. This article assumes that processing performance can provide a window onto this grammatical competence. Evidence is presented from online processing of English by thirty Chinese-speaking, twenty-eight Japanese-speaking, and forty-six Spanish-speaking participants which shows that the basic mechanisms of grammar remain intact for L2 learners in spite of inferior performance on judgements of those same sentences. Data suggest that working memory, as measured by the reading-span test (Daneman and Carpenter 1980), is not a source of individual variation in online L2 performance, whereas word span might be.
194 citations
••
172 citations
••
155 citations