scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Family Arbitration Using Sharia Law: Examining Ontario's Arbitration Act and its Impact on Women

Natasha Bakht
- 28 Oct 2004 - 
- Vol. 1, Iss: 1
TLDR
The legal implications of faith-based arbitration tribunals in family law, with a particular emphasis on the impact that Sharia could have on Muslim women in Ontario, are examined in this article.
Abstract
In Canada, much media attention has recently been focused on the formation of arbitration tribunals that would use Islamic law or Sharia to settle civil matters in Ontario. In fact, the idea of private parties voluntarily agreeing to arbitration using religious principles or a foreign legal system is not new. Ontario's Arbitration Act has allowed parties to resolve disputes outside the traditional court system for some time. This issue has been complicated by the fact that Canada has a commitment to upholding both a policy of multiculturalism and an international obligation towards women's rights. Although these values need not necessarily conflict, in this context, they have carried a tension that must be reconciled. This paper will examine the legal implications of faith-based arbitration tribunals in family law, with a particular emphasis on the impact that Sharia could have on Muslim women in Ontario.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Sharia Debate in Ontario: Gender, Islam, and Representations of Muslim Women's Agency

TL;DR: In 2003, the Canadian media reported that the Islamic Institute of Civil Justice would start offering arbitration in family disputes in accordance with both Islamic legal principles and Ontario's Arbitration Act of 1991 as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Is the Relationship between Inequity in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue of Legal Enclaves

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors adopt a feminist evolutionary analytic (FEA) approach, and hypothesize that nation-states with higher degrees of inequity in family law favoring men, codifying an evolutionary legacy of male dominance and control over female reproduction, will experience higher rates of violence against women.
Dissertation

Sharia and Constraint: Practices, Policies, and Responses to Faith-based Arbitration in Ontario

TL;DR: This article found that the vast majority of Muslim women seeking alternative dispute resolution services related to family law matters were Muslim women rather than Muslim men, and that the majority of Muslims seeking out these services were looking for a religious divorce in addition to a civil divorce so that they could remarry within their religious community.
Journal ArticleDOI

Separate and Unequal

TL;DR: In this paper, an ethnographic examination of legal processes in Family Court is presented, highlighting the osmosis between religious, cultural and legal realms, rather than essentialisms about the nature of Islam.
Journal ArticleDOI

The “what” and “who” of co-optation: gendered racialized migrations, settler nation-states and postcolonial difference

TL;DR: This paper developed a theoretical framework for understanding co-optation by separating the "who" and the "what" of co-opation: actors who embody diversity in public, political debate become the who, as their agency is shaped by gendered and racialized processes of subject making.