scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Grammatical Processing in Language Learners.

Harald Clahsen, +1 more
- 01 Jan 2006 - 
- Vol. 27, Iss: 1, pp 3-42
TLDR
This paper conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experimental psycholinguistic techniques and comparing different populations (mature native speakers, child first language [L1] and adult second language learners] as well as different domains of language (morphology and syntax).
Abstract
The ability to process the linguistic input in real time is crucial for successfully acquiring a language, and yet little is known about how language learners comprehend or produce language in real time. Against this background, we have conducted a detailed study of grammatical processing in language learners using experimental psycholinguistic techniques and comparing different populations (mature native speakers, child first language [L1] and adult second language [L2] learners) as well as different domains of language (morphology and syntax). This article presents an overview of the results from this project and of other previous studies, with the aim of explaining how grammatical processing in language learners differs from that of mature native speakers. For child L1 processing, we will argue for a continuity hypothesis claiming that the child's parsing mechanism is basically the same as that of mature speakers and does not change over time. Instead, empirical differences between child and mature speaker's processing can be explained by other factors such as the child's limited working memory capacity and by less efficient lexical retrieval. In nonnative (adult L2) language processing, some striking differences to native speakers were observed in the domain of sentence processing. Adult learners are guided by lexical–semantic cues during parsing in the same way as native speakers, but less so by syntactic information. We suggest that the observed L1/L2 differences can be explained by assuming that the syntactic representations adult L2 learners compute during comprehension are shallower and less detailed than those of native speakers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail?

TL;DR: The results confirm the persistent problems of Romance learners of Dutch with online gender processing and show that they cannot be overcome by reducing task demands related to the modality of stimulus presentation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Second language acquisition.

TL;DR: The review details the theoretical stance of the two different approaches to the nature of language: generative linguistics and general cognitive approaches and some results of key acquisition studies from the two theoretical frameworks are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism

TL;DR: This paper selectively reviews the research on the Interface Hypothesis, addressing some common misinterpretations and outlining the most recent interdisciplinary developments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian

TL;DR: The authors presented data from an experiment on the interpretation of intrasentential anaphora in Italian by native Italian speakers and by English speakers who have learned Italian as adults and reached a near-native level of proficiency in this language.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition

TL;DR: It is argued that the tendency to consider bilingualism as a unitary phenomenon explained in terms of simple component processes has created a set of apparent controversies that masks the richness of the central finding in this work: the adult mind and brain are open to experience in ways that create profound consequences for both language and cognition.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual differences in working memory and reading

TL;DR: The reading span, the number of final words recalled, varied from two to five for 20 college students and was correlated with three reading comprehension measures, including verbal SAT and tests involving fact retrieval and pronominal reference.
Journal ArticleDOI

Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies

TL;DR: The SPLT is shown to explain a wide range of processing complexity phenomena not previously accounted for under a single theory, including the lower complexity of subject-extraction relative clauses compared to object-extracted relative clauses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Handbook of second language acquisition

TL;DR: This review concludes that the current state of second language acquisition in the United States is likely to be worse than in previous years, due to the combination of language barriers and the high level of adoption of English as a second language.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing.

TL;DR: This review argues that sentence processing is supported by a temporo-frontal network, within this network, temporal regions subserve aspects of identification and frontal regions the building of syntactic and semantic relations.

On Wh-Movement

Noam Chomsky
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
How do language learners process grammatical information?

The paper discusses how language learners process grammatical information differently from mature native speakers. It mentions that child first language learners use similar parsing mechanisms as adults but may have limitations in working memory and lexical retrieval. Adult second language learners rely less on syntactic information during sentence processing.