scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving Science Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature.

TLDR
In this paper, the authors aimed to review and assess the effectiveness of the attempts undertaken to improve prospective and practising science teachers' conceptions of nature of science (NOS) by using science process-skills instruction or engagement in science-based inquiry activities.
Abstract
This paper aimed to review, and assess the 'effectiveness' of the attempts undertaken to improve prospective and practising science teachers' conceptions of nature of science (NOS). The reviewed attempts could be categorized into two general approches: implicit and explicit. Implicit attempts utilized science process-skills instruction or engagement in science-based inquiry activities to improve science teachers' conceptions of NOS. To achieve the same goal, explicit attempts used instruction geared towards various aspects of NOS and/or instruction that utilized elements from history and philosophy of science. To the extent that teachers' NOS conceptions were faithfully assessed by the instruments used in the reviewed studies, the explicit approach was relatively more effective in enhancing teachers' views. The relative ineffectiveness of the implicit approach could be attributed to two inherent assumptions. The first is that developing an understanding of NOS is an 'affective', as compared to a 'cognitiv...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science

TL;DR: The Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS) as discussed by the authors is an open-ended instrument, which in conjunction with individual interviews aims to provide meaningful assessments of learners' NOS views.
Journal ArticleDOI

Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research

TL;DR: A critical review of research related to informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues can be found in this article, where the authors discuss the relationship between nature of science conceptualizations and socio-scientific decision making.

Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future

TL;DR: The nature of science (NOS) has been advocated as an important goal for students studying science for approximately 100 years (Central Association ofScience and Mathematics Teachers, 1907) as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a three stage Delphi questionnaire with 23 participants drawn from the communities of leading and acknowledged international experts of science educators; scientists; historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science; experts engaged in work to improve the public understanding of science and expert science teachers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry

TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied developments in NOS conceptions during a period of five years and found that engaging in scientific inquiry alone does not enhance conceptions of the nature of science.
References
More filters
Book

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

TL;DR: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions as discussed by the authors is a seminal work in the history of science and philosophy of science, and it has been widely cited as a major source of inspiration for the present generation of scientists.
Journal ArticleDOI

Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching

TL;DR: In this paper, Shulman observa la historia de evaluaciones docentes, noting that the evaluación docente parecia preocuparse tanto por los conocimientos, como el siglo anterior se preoccupaba por la pedagogia.

CONOCIMIENTO Y ENSEÑANZA: FUNDAMENTOS DE LA NUEVA REFORMA 1 Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform

TL;DR: Lee S. Shulman as mentioned in this paper builds his foundation for teachi ng reform on an idea of teaching that emphasizes comprension and reasoning, transformation and reflection, and argues that this emphasis is justified by the resoluteness with which research and policy have so blatantly ignored those aspects of teaching in the past.
Related Papers (5)