scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship.

TLDR
It is argued that decision-makers and other commentators should extend their focus beyond costs solely to include consideration of whether medical technology results in better value in health care and broader socioeconomic benefits.
Abstract
Health care spending has risen steadily in most countries, becoming a concern for decision-makers worldwide. Commentators often point to new medical technology as the key driver for burgeoning expenditures. This paper critically appraises this conjecture, based on an analysis of the existing literature, with the aim of offering a more detailed and considered analysis of this relationship. Several databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Various categories of studies (eg, multivariate and cost-effectiveness analyses) were included to cover different perspectives, methodological approaches, and issues regarding the link between medical technology and costs. Selected articles were reviewed and relevant information was extracted into a standardized template and analyzed for key cross-cutting themes, ie, impact of technology on costs, factors influencing this relationship, and methodological challenges in measuring such linkages. A total of 86 studies were reviewed. The analysis suggests that the relationship between medical technology and spending is complex and often conflicting. Findings were frequently contingent on varying factors, such as the availability of other interventions, patient population, and the methodological approach employed. Moreover, the impact of technology on costs differed across technologies, in that some (eg, cancer drugs, invasive medical devices) had significant financial implications, while others were cost-neutral or cost-saving. In light of these issues, we argue that decision-makers and other commentators should extend their focus beyond costs solely to include consideration of whether medical technology results in better value in health care and broader socioeconomic benefits.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The National Bureau of Economic Research

TL;DR: The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBRE) as mentioned in this paper is a private non-profit corporation, formed to conduct or assist in the making of exact and impartial investigations in the field of economic, social and industrial science, and to this end to cooperate with governments, universities, learned societies, and individuals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review.

TL;DR: The development of guidelines to improve the reporting of experience with 3D printing in surgery is highly desirable and the additional cost and the time needed to produce devices by current 3D technology still limit its widespread use in hospitals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evolution and patterns of global health financing 1995–2014: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries

Joseph L Dieleman, +121 more
- 20 May 2017 - 
TL;DR: Health spending remains disparate, with low-income and lower-middle-income countries increasing spending in absolute terms the least, and relying heavily on OOP spending and development assistance.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Health Financing Transition: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence

TL;DR: Use of data over 1995-2009 from 126 countries shows a significant trend in health spending - rising about 1 per cent annually - which is associated with a combination of changing technology and medical practices, cost pressures and institutions that finance and manage healthcare.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Medical care costs: how much welfare loss?

TL;DR: This article focuses mainly on costs, arguing that the issue has been somewhat misconceived: while the level of medical care spending in the U.S. is a cause for concern, the welfare losses associated with rises in that level of spending may not be as large as the public rhetoric can make them seem.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is Technological Change In Medicine Worth It

TL;DR: It is concluded that medical spending as a whole is worth the increased cost of care, and has many implications for public policy.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Value of Life and the Rise in Health Spending

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a model based on standard economic assumptions and argued that health spending is a superior good with an income elasticity well above one, and that the optimal composition of total spending shifts toward health, and the health share grows along with income.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trends in Medicare Payments in the Last Year of Life

TL;DR: There is no evidence that persons in the last year of life account for a larger share of Medicare expenditures than in earlier years, and the same forces that have acted to increase overall Medicare expenditures have affected care for both decedents and survivors.
Posted Content

The Health Care Quadrilemma: An Essay on Technological Change, Insurance, Quality of Care, and Cost Containment

TL;DR: For example, this article showed that only 25% of the 200 top-selling drugs in 1972 remained in the group 15 years later (David Cleeton, Valy Goepfrich, and Burton Weisbrod 1990).
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (2)
How does changing medical technology affect health care cost, a review of the literature?

The paper states that the relationship between medical technology and health care costs is complex and often conflicting. The impact of technology on costs varies across technologies, with some having significant financial implications while others are cost-neutral or cost-saving.

How changing medical technology in eye surgery affect health care cost, a review of the literature?

The provided paper does not specifically mention the impact of changing medical technology in eye surgery on healthcare costs.