Nerve repair by means of tubulization: literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair.

TLDR: Different tubulization techniques proposed so far are described, focusing in particular on studies that reported on the employment of tubes with patients, and the clinical results are compared.

Abstract: Nerve repair is usually accomplished by direct suture when the two stumps can be approximated without tension. In the presence of a nerve defect, the placement of an autologous nerve graft is the current gold standard for nerve restoration. However, over the last 20 years, an increasing number of research articles reported on the use of non-nervous tubes (tubulization) for repairing nerve defects. The clinical employment of tubes (both biological and synthetic) as an alternative to autogenous nerve grafts is mainly justified by the limited availability of donor tissue for nerve autografts and the related morbidity. In addition, tubulization was proposed as an alternative to direct nerve sutures in order to create optimal conditions for nerve regeneration over the short empty space intentionally left between two nerve stumps. This paper outlines recent important advances in this field. Different tubulization techniques proposed so far are described, focusing in particular on studies that reported on the employment of tubes with patients. Our personal clinical experience on tubulization repair of sensory nerve lesions (digital nerves), using both biological and synthetic tubes, is presented, and the clinical results are compared. In our case series, both types of tubes led to good clinical results. Finally, we speculate about the prospects in the clinical application of tubulization for peripheral nerve repair.