scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors.

TLDR
In this paper, the authors carried out meta-analyses to quantify the influence of the clinical factors on the efficacy of primary root canal treatment and to identify the best treatment protocol based on the current evidence.
Abstract
Aims (i) To carry out meta-analyses to quantify the influence of the clinical factors on the efficacy of primary root canal treatment and (ii) to identify the best treatment protocol based on the current evidence. Methodology  The evidence for the effect of each clinical factor on the success rate (SR) of primary root canal treatment was gathered in three different ways: (i) intuitive synthesis of reported findings from individual studies; (ii) weighted pooled SR by each factor under investigation was estimated using random-effect meta-analysis; (iii) weighted effect of the factor under investigation on SR were estimated and expressed as odds ratio for the dichotomous outcomes (success or failure) using fixed- and random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity amongst the studies was assessed by Cochran’s (Q) test. Potential sources of statistical heterogeneity were investigated by exploring clinical heterogeneity using meta-regression models which included study characteristics in the regression models. Results  Out of the clinical factors investigated, pre-operative pulpal and periapical status were most frequently investigated, whilst the intra-operative factors were poorly studied in the 63 studies. Four factors were found to have a significant effect on the primary root canal treatment outcome, although the data heterogeneity was substantial, some of which could be explained by some of the study characteristics. Conclusions  Four conditions (pre-operative absence of periapical radiolucency, root filling with no voids, root filling extending to 2 mm within the radiographic apex and satisfactory coronal restoration) were found to improve the outcome of primary root canal treatment significantly. Root canal treatment should therefore aim at achieving and maintaining access to apical anatomy during chemo-mechanical debridement, obturating the canal with densely compacted material to the apical terminus without extrusion into the apical tissues and preventing re-infection with a good quality coronal restoration.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties.

TL;DR: MTA is a bioactive material that influences its surrounding environment and possesses some antibacterial and antifungal properties, depending on its powder-to-liquid ratio.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--part II: leakage and biocompatibility investigations.

TL;DR: On the basis of available evidence it appears that MTA seals well and is a biocompatible material.
Journal ArticleDOI

A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health.

TL;DR: Success based on periapical health associated with roots following 1°RCTx (83%) or 2°R CTx (80%) was similar, with 10 factors having a common effect on both, whilst the 11th factor 'EDTA as an additional irrigant' had different effects on the two treatments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices

TL;DR: An overview of the irrigant agitation methods currently available and their debridement efficacy and the need for studies that could more effectively evaluate specific irrigation methods by using standardized debris or biofilm models is presented.
Journal ArticleDOI

Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature

TL;DR: The presence of pre-operative periapical lesion, apical extent of root filling and quality of coronal restoration proved significant prognostic factors with concurrence between all three strands of evidence whilst the effects of 1 degrees RCT history and 2 degrees R CT protocol have been poorly investigated.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials*

TL;DR: This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting

TL;DR: A checklist contains specifications for reporting of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology, including background, search strategy, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion should improve the usefulness ofMeta-an analyses for authors, reviewers, editors, readers, and decision makers.
Journal ArticleDOI

The combination of estimates from different experiments.

TL;DR: The problem of making a combined estimate has been discussed previously by Cochran and Yates and Cochran (1937) for agricultural experiments, and by Bliss (1952) for bioassays in different laboratories as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?

TL;DR: The examples considered in this paper show the tension between the scientific rationale for using meta-regression and the difficult interpretative problems to which such analyses are prone.
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment

TL;DR: The predictability from clinical and radiographic signs of the treatment-outcome in individual cases with preoperative periapical lesions cases was found to be low and factors which were not measured or identified may be critical to the outcome of endodontic treatment.
Related Papers (5)