scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

K C Calman
- 01 Sep 1984 - 
- Vol. 10, Iss: 3, pp 124-127
TLDR
An hypothesis is proposed which suggests that the quality of life measures the difference, or the gap, at a particular period of time between the hopes and expectations of the individual and that individual's present experiences.
Abstract
Quality of life is a difficult concept to define and to measure. An hypothesis is proposed which suggests that the quality of life measures the difference, or the gap, at a particular period of time between the hopes and expectations of the individual and that individual's present experiences. Quality of life can only be described by the individual, and must take into account many aspects of life. The approach is goal-orientated, and one of task analysis. The hypothesis is developed in a diagramatic way, and several methods of testing the hypothesis suggested.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model

TL;DR: A theoretical model is proposed to clarify and predict changes in QOL as a result of the interaction of a catalyst, referring to changes in the respondent's health status, and a dynamic feedback loop aimed at maintaining or improving the perception of QOL.
Journal Article

Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

TL;DR: This research highlights the need to understand more fully the rationale behind the continued use of these devices, as well as the barriers to their adoption.
Journal ArticleDOI

Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?

TL;DR: It is concluded that if a reliable and consistent method of measuring quality of life in cancer patients is required, it must come from the patients themselves and not from their doctors and nurses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience?

TL;DR: It is argued that perceptions of health and its meaning vary between individuals and within an individual over time and a model of the relation between expectations and experience is proposed to illustrate problems in measuring quality of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research.

TL;DR: Qualitative considerations and promising assessment approaches for measuring response shift phenomenon in observational and interventional clinical research are presented and its hierarchical structure is discussed.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians.

TL;DR: The aim has been to provide a new measure that can help physicians assess the relative benefits and risks of various treatments for serious illness and of supportive programs such as palliative care or hospice service.
Journal ArticleDOI

A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study.

TL;DR: The results showed that the Nottingham Health Profile was capable of discriminating between groups differing in terms of diagnosed chronic illness, number of consultations at primary care level, and physiological fitness.
Journal ArticleDOI

The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure.

TL;DR: Differences among the correlations obtained for each criterion measure with SIP score are discussed in terms of the need for the development of criterion measures that can be expected to differentially relate to the constructs inherent in the SIP.
Journal ArticleDOI

The development of a subjective health indicator

TL;DR: Studies carried out over the past four years have led to the construction of an indicator in the form of a profile which has been shown to provide valid measures of perceived health status and to be acceptable to respondents.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer

TL;DR: Linear analogue self-assessment was used to measure the subjective effects of treatment in women with advanced breast cancer and the results show that this technique may be used to monitor the subjective benefit of treatment and to compare the subjective toxicities of different therapeutic regimens.
Related Papers (5)