scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Successful strategies in implementing a multidisciplinary team working in the care of patients with cancer: an overview and synthesis of the available literature

TLDR
The aim of the literature review is to synthesize current scientific and clinical understanding on cancer MDTs and their organization to provide an up-to-date summary of the current knowledge that those planning or leading cancer services can use as a guide for service implementation or improvement.
Abstract
In many health care systems globally, cancer care is driven by multidisciplinary cancer teams (MDTs). A large number of studies in the past few years and across different literature have been performed to better understand how these teams work and how they manage patient care. The aim of our literature review is to synthesize current scientific and clinical understanding on cancer MDTs and their organization; this, in turn, should provide an up-to-date summary of the current knowledge that those planning or leading cancer services can use as a guide for service implementation or improvement. We describe the characteristics of an effective MDT and factors that influence how these teams work. A range of factors pertaining to teamwork, availability of patient information, leadership, team and meeting management, and workload can affect how well MDTs are implemented within patient care. We also review how to assess and improve these teams. We present a range of instruments designed to be used with cancer MDTs - including observational tools, self-assessments, and checklists. We conclude with a practical outline of what appears to be the best practices to implement (Dos) and practices to avoid (Don'ts) when setting up MDT-driven cancer care.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care.

TL;DR: The aim of this comprehensive review is to assess the role of the different supportive disciplines integrated in an MDT and how they help providing a better care to HNC patients during diagnosis, treatment and follow up.
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine

TL;DR: A perspective from behavioural safety science, which has been studying team-working in healthcare for the last 20 years, is offered and practical suggestions are made on how to integrate evidence and best practice into modern geriatric medicine-to address current and future challenges are offered.
Journal ArticleDOI

Improving the effectiveness of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: analysis of a national survey of MDT members’ opinions about streamlining patient discussions

TL;DR: This work complements previous analyses in supporting the development of tumour-specific guidance for streamlining MDM discussions considering a range of approaches and indicates that the majority of participants agreed that streamlining discussions may be beneficial although variable interpretations of ‘streamlining’ were apparent.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Nurse–surgeon object transfer: Video analysis of communication and situation awareness in the operating theatre

TL;DR: The smoothness of object transfer can be improved by adjusting the scrub nurse's instrument trolley position, enabling a better monitoring of surgeon's bodily conduct and affording early orientation (awareness) to an upcoming request (changing situation).
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictors of Treatment Decisions in Multidisciplinary Oncology Meetings: A Quantitative Observational Study

TL;DR: Multidisciplinary inputs into case reviews and patient psychosocial information stimulate decision making, thereby reinforcing the role of MTBs in cancer care in processing such information.
Journal ArticleDOI

Decision-making in Colorectal Cancer Tumor Board meetings: Results of a prospective observational assessment

TL;DR: The cMDT-MODe instrument can be reliably used to prospectively assess decision making in the multidisciplinary management of colorectal patients and can identify areas for improving practice so as to optimize decision making for cancer care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork.

TL;DR: Self-assessment of team performance using this tool may support MDT development and may support existing and new standardised tools to measure performance.
Related Papers (5)