scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development.

TLDR
The CARE (CAse REport) guidelines for case report guidelines as mentioned in this paper were developed by a three-phase consensus process consisting of pre-meeting literature review and interviews to generate items for the reporting guidelines, a face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the reporting guideline, and postmeeting feedback, review and pilot testing, followed by finalisation of the case report guideline.
Abstract
A case report is a narrative that describes, for medical, scientific or educational purposes, a medical problem experienced by one or more patients. Case reports written without guidance from reporting standards are insufficiently rigorous to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. Develop, disseminate and implement systematic reporting guidelines for case reports. We used a three-phase consensus process consisting of (1) premeeting literature review and interviews to generate items for the reporting guidelines, (2) a face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the reporting guidelines and (3) postmeeting feedback, review and pilot testing, followed by finalisation of the case report guidelines. This consensus process involved 27 participants and resulted in a 13-item checklist—a reporting guideline for case reports. The primary items of the checklist are title, key words, abstract, introduction, patient information, clinical findings, timeline, diagnostic assessment, therapeutic interventions, follow-up and outcomes, discussion, patient perspective and informed consent. We believe the implementation of the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines by medical journals will improve the completeness and transparency of published case reports and that the systematic aggregation of information from case reports will inform clinical study design, provide early signals of effectiveness and harms, and improve healthcare delivery.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the Modified Naranjo Criteria for Assessing Causal Attribution of Clinical Outcome to Homeopathic Intervention as Presented in Case Reports

TL;DR: The M: odified N: aranjo C: riteria for H: omeopathy-Causal Attribution Inventory was identified as a valid tool for assessing the likelihood of a causal relationship between a homeopathic intervention and clinical outcome.
Journal ArticleDOI

Oral Complications of ICU Patients with COVID-19: Case-Series and Review of Two Hundred Ten Cases.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the prevalence and characteristics of the critically ill COVID-19 patients with oral complications, including oral candidiasis, herpetic and haemorrhagic ulcers, and acute onset macroglossia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Delays in the post-marketing withdrawal of drugs to which deaths have been attributed: a systematic investigation and analysis

TL;DR: These results suggest that some deaths associated with medicinal products withdrawn after marketing in association with deaths could have been avoided and manufacturers and regulatory authorities should expedite investigations when deaths are reported as suspected adverse drug reactions and consider early suspensions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Carbon monoxide poisoning following use of a water pipe/hookah

TL;DR: This case series reveals that CO intoxication due to water-pipe smoking is probably more common than is generally realized and emergency room staff should be aware of this problem and inquire specifically about water- pipe smoking in patients with nonspecific neurological manifestations.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19 Related Oral Manifestations, Early Disease Features?

TL;DR: There is emerging evidence on the oral lesions that may be indicative of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and epidemiologic and clinical researchers are establishing highly sensitive case definitions to track all true positive cases.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

TL;DR: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study, resulting in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles.
Journal ArticleDOI

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

TL;DR: The Consort 2010 Statement as discussed by the authors has been used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials and has been updated by Schulz et al. in 2010, based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.
Journal ArticleDOI

The environment and disease: association or causation?

TL;DR: The criteria outlined in "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" help identify the causes of many diseases, including cancers of the reproductive system.
Related Papers (5)