scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector

Firdaus Abdullah
- 01 Nov 2006 - 
- Vol. 30, Iss: 6, pp 569-581
TLDR
In this article, the authors proposed a new measuring instrument of service quality that captures the authentic determinants within the higher education sector, namely, non-academic aspects, academic aspects, reputation, access, programme issues and understanding.
Abstract
Preface Service quality has attracted considerable attention within the tertiary education sector, but despite this, little work has been concentrated on identifying its determinants from the standpoint of students being the primary customers. Thus, it would seem rational to develop a new measurement scale that incorporates not only the academic components, but also aspects of the total service environment as experienced by the student. Likewise, there are many areas of disagreement in the debate over how to measure service quality, and recent research has raised many questions over the principles on which the existing instruments are founded. Although these generic instruments have been tested with some degree of success in wide-ranging service industries, but their replication in higher education sector is still hazy. This paper describes the methodological development of HEdPERF (Higher Education PERFormanceonly), a new measuring instrument of service quality that captures the authentic determinants of service quality within the higher education sector. The proposed 41-item instrument has been empirically tested for unidimensionality, reliability and validity using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Such valid and reliable measuring scale would be a tool that tertiary institutions could use to improve service performance in the light of increased competition with the development of global education markets. The results from the current study are crucial because previous studies have produced scales that bear a resemblance to the generic measures of service quality, which may not be totally adequate to assess the perceived quality in higher education. Furthermore, previous researches have been too narrow, with an overemphasis on the quality of academics and too little attention paid to the non-academic aspects of the educational experience. Research findings confirmed that the six dimensions, namely, non-academic aspects, academic aspects, reputation, access, programme issues and understanding were distinct and conceptually clear. Therefore, it can be posited that student perceptions of service quality can be considered as a six-factor structure consisting of the identified six dimensions. Consequently, tertiary institutions should assess all the six dimensions of service quality to ascertain the level of services provided, and to determine which dimensions need improvement. Evaluating service quality level and understanding how various dimensions impact overall service quality would ultimately enable tertiary institutions to efficiently design the service delivery process. In addition, knowing the strengths and weaknesses of these dimensions and their relative influence may result in better allocation of resources so as to provide a better service to students. While many service quality attributes may influence a student’s perception to a certain extent, the results also indicate that access, which relates to such aspects as approachability, ease of contact, availability and convenience has significantly influenced the overall service quality perception. In other words, students perceived access to be more important than other dimensions in determining the quality of the service that they received. Tertiary institutions should therefore concentrate their efforts on the dimension perceived to be important rather than focusing their energies on a number of different attributes, which they feel are important determinants of service quality. While the idea of providing adequate service on all dimensions may seem attractive to most service marketers and managers, failure to prioritize these attributes may result in inefficient

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Total quality management.

Bowe J
TL;DR: Developing and delivering high quality products and services means that you are doing things correctly from the beginning, and as a consequence you are reducing the need for additional services, from verification to warranty.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the relative efficacy of three measuring instruments of service quality (namely Higher Education PERFormance (HEdPERF), SERVPERF and the moderating scale of HEDPERF) within a higher education setting and determined which instrument had the superior measuring capability in terms of unidimensionality, reliability, validity and explained variance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of the factors that determine quality in higher education: an empirical study

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify the quality determinants for education services provided by higher education institutions (HEIs) in Greece and measure their relative importance from the students' points of view.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty?: A study of international students in Malaysian public universities

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the effect of Malaysian public universities' service quality on international student satisfaction, institutional image and loyalty, and find that all the five dimensions of higher education service quality influence student satisfaction which in turn influences institutional image, and together they influence student loyalty.
References
More filters
Book

Using multivariate statistics

TL;DR: In this Section: 1. Multivariate Statistics: Why? and 2. A Guide to Statistical Techniques: Using the Book Research Questions and Associated Techniques.
Journal Article

SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the development of a 22-item instrument (called SERVQUAL) for assessing customer perceptions of service quality in service and retailing organizations, and the procedures used in constructing and refining a multiple-item scale to measure the construct are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research

TL;DR: The attainment of quality in products and services has become a pivotal concern of the 1980s as discussed by the authors, while quality in tangible goods has been described and measured by marketers, quality in services is la...
Journal ArticleDOI

A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs

TL;DR: A critical element in the evolution of a fundamental body of knowledge in marketing, as well as for improved marketing practice, is the development of better measures of the variables with which marketers deal with marketing as discussed by the authors.
Book

Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an overview of the basic concepts of multivariate analysis, including matrix algebra and random vectors, as well as a strategy for analyzing multivariate models.
Related Papers (5)