The gastrointestinal tract is a complex ecosystem that associates a resident microbiota and cells of various phenotypes lining the epithelial wall expressing complex metabolic activities. The resident microbiota in the digestive tract is a heterogeneous microbial ecosystem containing up to 1×1014 colony-forming units (CFUs) of bacteria. The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in normal gut function and maintaining host health. The host is protected from attack by potentially harmful microbial microorganisms by the physical and chemical barriers created by the gastrointestinal epithelium. The cells lining the gastrointestinal epithelium and the resident microbiota are two partners that properly and/or synergistically function to promote an efficient host system of defence. The gastrointestinal cells that make up the epithelium, provide a physical barrier that protects the host against the unwanted intrusion of microorganisms into the gastrointestinal microbiota, and against the penetration of harmful microorganisms which usurp the cellular molecules and signalling pathways of the host to become pathogenic. One of the basic physiological functions of the resident microbiota is that it functions as a microbial barrier against microbial pathogens. The mechanisms by which the species of the microbiota exert this barrier effect remain largely to be determined. There is increasing evidence that lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, which inhabit the gastrointestinal microbiota, develop antimicrobial activities that participate in the host's gastrointestinal system of defence. The objective of this review is to analyze the in vitro and in vivo experimental and clinical studies in which the antimicrobial activities of selected lactobacilli and bifidobacteria strains have been documented.

Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens

https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(04)00456-1/pdf

Therapeutic manipulation of the enteric microflora in inflammatory bowel diseases: antibiotics, probiotics, and prebiotics

Probiotics are live microorganisms that provide health benefits to the host when ingested in adequate amounts. The strains most frequently used as probiotics include lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Probiotics have demonstrated significant potential as therapeutic options for a variety of diseases, but the mechanisms responsible for these effects have not been fully elucidated yet. Several important mechanisms underlying the antagonistic effects of probiotics on various microorganisms include the following: modification of the gut microbiota, competitive adherence to the mucosa and epithelium, strengthening of the gut epithelial barrier and modulation of the immune system to convey an advantage to the host. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that probiotics communicate with the host by pattern recognition receptors, such as toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein-like receptors, which modulate key signaling pathways, such as nuclear factor-ĸB and mitogen-activated protein kinase, to enhance or suppress activation and influence downstream pathways. This recognition is crucial for eliciting measured antimicrobial responses with minimal inflammatory tissue damage. A clear understanding of these mechanisms will allow for appropriate probiotic strain selection for specific applications and may uncover novel probiotic functions. The goal of this systematic review was to explore probiotic modes of action focusing on how gut microbes influence the host.

/pdf/probiotic-mechanisms-of-action-2jyemfk5rm.pdf

Probiotic Mechanisms of Action

According to the German definition, probiotics are defined viable microorganisms, sufficient amounts of which reach the intestine in an active state and thus exert positive health effects. Numerous probiotic microorganisms (e.g. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, L. reuteri, bifidobacteria and certain strains of L. casei or the L. acidophilus-group) are used in probiotic food, particularly fermented milk products, or have been investigated—as well as Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917, certain enterococci (Enterococcus faecium SF68) and the probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii—with regard to their medicinal use. Among the numerous purported health benefits attributed to probiotic bacteria, the (transient) modulation of the intestinal microflora of the host and the capacity to interact with the immune system directly or mediated by the autochthonous microflora, are basic mechanisms. They are supported by an increasing number of in vitro and in vivo experiments using conventional and molecular biologic methods. In addition to these, a limited number of randomized, well-controlled human intervention trials have been reported.

Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics

Background
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and nosocomial sepsis are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Through prevention of bacterial migration across the mucosa, competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria, and enhancing the immune responses of the host, prophylactic enteral probiotics (live microbial supplements) may play a role in reducing NEC and the associated morbidity.

Objectives
To compare the efficacy and safety of prophylactic enteral probiotics administration versus placebo or no treatment in the prevention of severe NEC or sepsis, or both, in preterm infants.

Search methods
For this update, searches were made of MEDLINE (1966 to October 2013), EMBASE (1980 to October 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2013, Issue 10), and abstracts of annual meetings of the Society for Pediatric Research (1995 to 2013).

Selection criteria
Only randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that enrolled preterm infants < 37 weeks gestational age or < 2500 g birth weight, or both, were considered. Trials were included if they involved enteral administration of any live microbial supplement (probiotics) and measured at least one prespecified clinical outcome.

Data collection and analysis
Standard methods of The Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Group were used to assess the methodologic quality of the trials and for data collection and analysis.

Main results
Twenty-four eligible trials were included. Included trials were highly variable with regard to enrolment criteria (that is birth weight and gestational age), baseline risk of NEC in the control groups, timing, dose, formulation of the probiotics, and feeding regimens. In a meta-analysis of trial data, enteral probiotics supplementation significantly reduced the incidence of severe NEC (stage II or more) (typical relative risk (RR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.56; 20 studies, 5529 infants) and mortality (typical RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.81; 17 studies, 5112 infants). There was no evidence of significant reduction of nosocomial sepsis (typical RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; 19 studies, 5338 infants). The included trials reported no systemic infection with the supplemental probiotics organism. Probiotics preparations containing either lactobacillus alone or in combination with bifidobacterium were found to be effective.

Authors' conclusions
Enteral supplementation of probiotics prevents severe NEC and all cause mortality in preterm infants. Our updated review of available evidence strongly supports a change in practice. Head to head comparative studies are required to assess the most effective preparations, timing, and length of therapy to be utilized.

Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants

Enteral probiotics such as Lactobacillus casei GG (LGG) have been used in the treatment of a variety of intestinal disorders in infants and children, including diarrhea, malabsorption, and Clostridium difficile colitis. Previous studies have identified the gene locus for mucin (MUC-2) and its expression in Caco-2 cells. Others have demonstrated that mucin, located on the surface of the intestinal epithelium, inhibits bacterial translocation (BT). We previously demonstrated that both mucin and the probiotic bacterium LGG have an inhibitory effect on BT in both an in-vitro Caco-2 cell model and a neonatal rabbit model. We hypothesized that the decline in BT by LGG is mediated by up-regulation of epithelial MUC-2. Human enterocyte Caco-2 cells were grown to confluence and incubated at 37 � C with either medium (control group) or 10 4 or 10 8 LGG for 180 min. Non- adherent LGG was washed away. Caco-2 cells were then lysed, purified, and quantified for MUC-2 protein and mRNA. The addition of LGG to the enterocyte mono- layer surface resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) in- creased MUC-2 expression compared to the untreated monolayers. Protein densities for MUC-2 significantly (P < 0.05) increased with LGG. Density (expressed as ratio to control group) was 8.6 ± 1.3 in the low-dose group (10 4 LGG) and 15.6 ± 2.3 in the high-dose group (10 8 LGG). LGG may thus bind to specific receptor sites on the enterocyte and stimulate the up-regulation of MUC-2, resulting in increased inhibition of BT.

/pdf/probiotics-up-regulate-muc-2-mucin-gene-expression-in-a-caco-25v322f1u6.pdf

Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model.

Enteral probiotics such as Lactobacillus casei GG (LGG) have been used in the treatment of a variety of intestinal disorders in infants and children, including diarrhea, malabsorption, and Clostridium difficile colitis. We have previously demonstrated that the probiotic bacterium LGG has an inhibitory effect on bacterial translocation (BT) in a neonatal rabbit model. However, this in-vivo model is limited for investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for probiotic inhibition of BT. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of LGG in reducing the rate of Escherichia coliC25 (E. coli C25) translocation using an in-vitro enterocyte cell-culture model. Human colonic carcinoma (Caco-2) enterocytes were seeded in porous filters in the apical chamber of a two-chamber cell- culture system and grown for 14 days to confluence. The monolayers were incubated at 37 °C with LGG for 180 min. Non-adherent LGG was washed away prior to a 120-min incubation period with 105 CFU E. coli C25. E. coli that had translocated across the enterocyte monolayer were quantified by growing basal-chamber media samples on gram-negative bacteria-specific MacConkey's agar. In order to determine monolayer integrity, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was measured across Caco-2 cells treated with LGG and E. coli. Statistical analysis was by ANOVA with P < 0.05 considered significant. LGG inhibited E. coli translocation at all LGG concentrations tested. The TEER ratio was not significantly altered by addition of LGG or E. coli (0.9 ± 0.03 vs 0.8 ± 0.05). These results demonstrate that the probiotic bacterium LGG inhibits BT of E. coli C25 in a dose-dependent manner in an in-vitro cell-culture model. This model should be valuable in investigating the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the inhibition of pathological enteral bacteria by probiotic agents.

/pdf/effect-of-probiotics-on-enterocyte-bacterial-translocation-49xks9p05p.pdf

Effect of probiotics on enterocyte bacterial translocation in vitro

Topical nanoemulsion therapy reduces bacterial wound infection and inflammation after burn injury

MUC-2 mucin production in Hirschsprung's disease: possible association with enterocolitis development.

Thermal injury induces dermal inflammatory and proapoptotic signaling. These phenomena extend burn wound size and trigger a systemic inflammatory response, factors known to adversely affect outcomes. p38MAPK is known to trigger inflammatory responses and induce epithelial proapoptotic genes. We hypothesize that topical p38MAPK inhibition will attenuate excessive inflammatory and apoptotic signaling and reduce dermal tissue loss. Rats were given a 30% total body surface area partial thickness burn or sham injury. Some of the animals were treated with a p38MAPK inhibitor or vehicle, which was applied directly to the wound. Dermal inflammation was investigated with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, myeloperoxidase assay, and Evans blue extravasation. Apoptotic changes were detected using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling assay and Caspase-3 in situ staining. Burn injury activated dermal p38MAPK and induced a significant rise in dermal IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta expression. Neutrophil sequestration, microvascular damage, and hair follicle apoptosis were significantly elevated after injury. Topical p38MAPK inhibition significantly attenuated downstream dermal p38MAPK targets, proinflammatory cytokine expression, neutrophil sequestration, and microvascular injury. A significant reduction in hair follicle apoptosis was seen. This study demonstrates the attenuation of burn-induced cellular stress by topical application of p38MAPK inhibitors. Blunting early excessive inflammatory signaling may be an efficient strategy to improve patient outcomes after burn injury.

Aladdein Mattar

Papers

Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model.

Effect of probiotics on enterocyte bacterial translocation in vitro

Topical nanoemulsion therapy reduces bacterial wound infection and inflammation after burn injury

MUC-2 mucin production in Hirschsprung's disease: possible association with enterocolitis development.

Topical p38MAPK inhibition reduces dermal inflammation and epithelial apoptosis in burn wounds.