C
C O Lovejoy
Researcher at Kent State University
Publications - 16
Citations - 5109
C O Lovejoy is an academic researcher from Kent State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Australopithecus & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 16 publications receiving 4687 citations. Previous affiliations of C O Lovejoy include Case Western Reserve University & Northeast Ohio Medical University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Chronological metamorphosis of the auricular surface of the ilium: a new method for the determination of adult skeletal age at death.
TL;DR: Results show that the system is equally accurate to pubic symphyseal aging (although somewhat more difficult to apply), and also carries the advantages of a higher preservation rate for the auricular surface in archaeological populations and continued age-related change beyond the fifth decade.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ectocranial suture closure: a revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures
Richard S. Meindl,C O Lovejoy +1 more
TL;DR: It is concluded that suture closure can provide valuable estimates of age-at-death in both archaeological and forensic contexts when used in conjunction with other skeletal age indicators.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dental wear in the Libben population: Its functional pattern and role in the determination of adult skeletal age at death
TL;DR: Dental wear is concluded to be a highly reliable and important indicator of adult age at death for skeletal populations if seriation procedures are employed.
Journal ArticleDOI
A revised method of age determination using the os pubis, with a review and tests of accuracy of other current methods of pubic symphyseal aging
TL;DR: Modifications were made of the Todd system to eliminate this and other deficiencies, and a second test using a new sample was conducted, and the age distribution determined by the revised Todd method did not significantly differ from the actual age distribution of the second sample.
Journal ArticleDOI
The gait of Australopithecus.
TL;DR: Morphological differences between Australopithecus and modern man appear to be the result of different degrees of encephalization rather than any difference in locomotor adaptation.