Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands.

The use of fossil fuels is now widely accepted as unsustainable due to depleting resources and the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the environment that have already exceeded the “dangerously high” threshold of 450 ppm CO2-e. To achieve environmental and economic sustainability, fuel production processes are required that are not only renewable, but also capable of sequestering atmospheric CO2. Currently, nearly all renewable energy sources (e.g. hydroelectric, solar, wind, tidal, geothermal) target the electricity market, while fuels make up a much larger share of the global energy demand (∼66%). Biofuels are therefore rapidly being developed. Second generation microalgal systems have the advantage that they can produce a wide range of feedstocks for the production of biodiesel, bioethanol, biomethane and biohydrogen. Biodiesel is currently produced from oil synthesized by conventional fuel crops that harvest the sun’s energy and store it as chemical energy. This presents a route for renewable and carbon-neutral fuel production. However, current supplies from oil crops and animal fats account for only approximately 0.3% of the current demand for transport fuels. Increasing biofuel production on arable land could have severe consequences for global food supply. In contrast, producing biodiesel from algae is widely regarded as one of the most efficient ways of generating biofuels and also appears to represent the only current renewable source of oil that could meet the global demand for transport fuels. The main advantages of second generation microalgal systems are that they: (1) Have a higher photon conversion efficiency (as evidenced by increased biomass yields per hectare): (2) Can be harvested batch-wise nearly all-year-round, providing a reliable and continuous supply of oil: (3) Can utilize salt and waste water streams, thereby greatly reducing freshwater use: (4) Can couple CO2-neutral fuel production with CO2 sequestration: (5) Produce non-toxic and highly biodegradable biofuels. Current limitations exist mainly in the harvesting process and in the supply of CO2 for high efficiency production. This review provides a brief overview of second generation biodiesel production systems using microalgae.

https://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/BioEnergyResearch_Second+Generation+Biofuels+High-Efficiency+Microalgae+for+Biodiesel+Production.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1347846-0

Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production

Occurrences and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in drinking water and water/sewage treatment plants: A review

Chromium is a highly toxic non-essential metal for microorganisms and plants. Due to its widespread industrial use, chromium (Cr) has become a serious pollutant in diverse environmental settings. The hexavalent form of the metal, Cr(VI), is considered a more toxic species than the relatively innocuous and less mobile Cr(III) form. The presence of Cr in the environment has selected microbial and plant variants able to tolerate high levels of Cr compounds. The diverse Cr-resistance mechanisms displayed by microorganisms, and probably by plants, include biosorption, diminished accumulation, precipitation, reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), and chromate efflux. Some of these systems have been proposed as potential biotechnological tools for the bioremediation of Cr pollution. In this review we summarize the interactions of bacteria, algae, fungi and plants with Cr and its compounds.

http://envismadrasuniv.org/Bioremediation/pdf/Interactions%20of%20chromium%20with%20microorganisms.pdf

Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants

Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment.

The first experiments using wetland macrophytes for wastewater treatment were carried out in Germany in the early 1950s. Since then, the constructed wetlands have evolved into a reliable wastewater treatment technology for various types of wastewater. The classification of constructed wetlands is based on: the vegetation type (emergent, submerged, floating leaved, free-floating); hydrology (free water surface and subsurface flow); and subsurface flow wetlands can be further classified according to the flow direction (vertical or horizontal). In order to achieve better treatment performance, namely for nitrogen, various types of constructed wetlands could be combined into hybrid systems.

/pdf/constructed-wetlands-for-wastewater-treatment-26x76qq1f2.pdf

Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment

The first experiments on the use of wetland plants to treat wastewaters were carried out in the early 1950s by Dr. Kathe Seidel in Germany and the first full-scale systems were put into operation during the late 1960s. Since then, the subsurface systems have been commonly used in Europe while free water surface systems have been more popular in North America and Australia. During the 1970s and 1980s, the information on constructed wetland technology spread slowly. But since the 1990s the technology has become international, facilitated by exchange among scientists and researchers around the world. Because of the need for more effective removal of ammonia and total nitrogen, during the 1990s and 2000s vertical and horizontal flow constructed wetlands were combined to complement each other to achieve higher treatment efficiency. Today, constructed wetlands are recognized as a reliable wastewater treatment technology and they represent a suitable solution for the treatment of many types of wastewater.

Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Five Decades of Experience†

https://www.sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/VYMAZAL%202005%20HSF%20and%20Hybrid%20CW%20for%20WastewaterTreatment.pdf

Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment

The presence of macrophytes is one of the most conspicuous features of wetlands and their presence distinguishes constructed wetlands from unplanted soil filters or lagoons The macrophytes growing in constructed wetlands have several properties in relation to the treatment process that make them an essential component of the design However, only several roles of macrophytes apply to constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow (HF CWs) The plants used in HF CWs designed for wastewater treatment should therefore: (1) be tolerant of high organic and nutrient loadings, (2) have rich belowground organs (ie roots and rhizomes) in order to provide substrate for attached bacteria and oxygenation (even very limited) of areas adjacent to roots and rhizomes and (3) have high aboveground biomass for winter insulation in cold and temperate regions and for nutrient removal via harvesting The comparison of treatment efficiency of vegetated HF CWs and unplanted filters is not unanimous but most studies have shown that systems with plants achieve higher treatment efficiency The vegetation has mostly a positive effect, ie supports higher treatment efficiency, for organics and nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus By far the most frequently used plant around the globe is Phragmites australis (Common reed) Species of the genera Typha (latifolia, angustifolia, domingensis, orientalis and glauca) and Scirpus (eg lacustris, validus, californicus and acutus) spp are other commonly used species In many countries, and especially in the tropics and subtropics, local plants including ornamental species are used for HF CWs

Jan Vymazal

Papers

Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands.

Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment

Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: Five Decades of Experience†

Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment

Plants used in constructed wetlands with horizontal subsurface flow: a review