scispace - formally typeset
J

John R. Kerr

Researcher at University of Cambridge

Publications -  29
Citations -  2528

John R. Kerr is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Risk perception & Politics. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 23 publications receiving 890 citations. Previous affiliations of John R. Kerr include University of Otago & Victoria University of Wellington.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world

TL;DR: It is found that although levels of concern are relatively high, they are highest in the UK compared to all other sampled countries, and risk perception correlated significantly with reported adoption of preventative health behaviors in all ten countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world

TL;DR: A clear link between susceptibility to misinformation and both vaccine hesitancy and a reduced likelihood to comply with health guidance measures is demonstrated, and interventions which aim to improve critical thinking and trust in science may be a promising avenue for future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Political polarization on COVID-19 pandemic response in the United States

TL;DR: It is found that liberals (compared to conservatives) perceive higher risk, place less trust in politicians to handle the pandemic, are more trusting of medical experts such as the WHO, and are more critical of the government response.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID-19 risk perception: a longitudinal analysis of its predictors and associations with health protective behaviours in the United Kingdom

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present results from five cross-sectional surveys on public risk perception of COVID-19 and its association with health protective behaviours in the UK over a 10-month period.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Information about COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Side Effects on Behavioural Intentions: Two Online Experiments

TL;DR: This article investigated the effects of providing transparent communication including uncertainty about vaccination effectiveness on decision-making, and found no main effect of messages on intentions to receive a vaccine and neither did they increase intentions to engage in protective behaviours post-vaccination.