scispace - formally typeset
L

Leo Kaas

Researcher at Goethe University Frankfurt

Publications -  91
Citations -  1539

Leo Kaas is an academic researcher from Goethe University Frankfurt. The author has contributed to research in topics: Wage & Unemployment. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 89 publications receiving 1381 citations. Previous affiliations of Leo Kaas include University of Vienna & Institute for the Study of Labor.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Ethnic Discrimination in Germany's Labour Market: A Field Experiment

TL;DR: This paper studied ethnic discrimination in Germany's labour market with a correspondence test and found that a Turkish-sounding and a German-sounding name raised the average probability of a callback by about 14%.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficient Firm Dynamics in a Frictional Labor Market

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors develop and analyze an alternative to the existing bargaining framework: Firms compete for labor by publicly posting long-term contracts, which allows to fill vacancies with higher probability, consistent with empirical regularities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stabilizing chaos in a dynamic macroeconomic model

TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that the government can stabilize an unstable Walrasian equilibrium in a short time by varying income tax rates or government expenditures, and different stabilizing policies were compared with regard to their efficiency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Differential savings, factor shares, and endogenous growth cycles

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyzed the dynamic properties of the one-sector growth model with differential savings in the sense of Kaldor-Pasinetti and showed that the system exhibits unstable steady states and fluctuations if the income distribution varies sufficiently and if shareholders save more than workers.
Posted Content

Financial market integration and loan competition : when is entry deregulation socially beneficial?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider a model of spatial loan competition where a market that is served by less efficient banks is opened to entry by banks that are more efficient in screening borrowers, and they show that there is typically too little entry and that market shares of entrant banks are too small relative to their socially optimal level.