M
Mikael Sundfeldt
Researcher at Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Publications - 17
Citations - 819
Mikael Sundfeldt is an academic researcher from Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Implant & Orthopedic surgery. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 15 publications receiving 663 citations. Previous affiliations of Mikael Sundfeldt include University of Gothenburg.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories.
TL;DR: It emerges from this review that aseptic loosening has a multifactorial etiology and cannot be explained by a single theory.
Journal ArticleDOI
Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register
David Wennergren,David Wennergren,Carl Bergdahl,Jan Ekelund,Hans Juto,Mikael Sundfeldt,Michael Möller +6 more
TL;DR: Among women, tibia fractures showed an increasing incidence with age in all segments, whereas men had a fairly flat incidence curve, except for tibial shaft fractures, which displayed a peak among young males.
Journal ArticleDOI
High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
TL;DR: Evaluating how accurate the classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register is shows that the accuracy of classification was substantial for the AO/OTA type (kappa=0.75) and moderate for the Alloa/OTA group ( kappa= 0.56) as defined by Landis and Koch.
Journal ArticleDOI
Effect of submicron polyethylene particles on an osseointegrated implant: an experimental study with a rabbit patello-femoral prosthesis.
TL;DR: No statistically significant differences between test and control groups are found, and the UHMWPE debris did not induce any significant osteolysis, indicating that an osseointegrated implant with a sealed interface may not be affected by UH MWPE debris or progress to aseptic loosening.
Journal ArticleDOI
Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register
TL;DR: The classification of humerus fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register was just as accurate as in previous studies, i.e. moderate as defined by Landis and Koch, however, when a modified analysis was introduced, that takes into account the similarities between certain fractures, the accuracy was “near perfect”.