scispace - formally typeset
R

Robert W. Lent

Researcher at University of Maryland, College Park

Publications -  166
Citations -  32601

Robert W. Lent is an academic researcher from University of Maryland, College Park. The author has contributed to research in topics: Social cognitive theory & Social cognition. The author has an hindex of 68, co-authored 161 publications receiving 29576 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert W. Lent include Ohio State University & University of Minnesota.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a social cognitive framework for understanding three intricately linked aspects of career development: (a) the formation and elaboration of career-relevant interests, (b) selection of academic and career choice options, and (c) performance and persistence in educational and occupational pursuits.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.

TL;DR: A recent review of the career barriers literature presents a mixed picture as discussed by the authors, on the one hand, students and workers do perceive barriers to their career progress; but on the other hand, barrier ratings are often found to be besomewhat modest in size and have not been shown to be consistently related to important career outcome or process variables in the mostly student samples in which they have been studied.
Book

Handbook of counseling psychology

TL;DR: The Maturation of Counseling Psychology: Multifaceted Perspectives, 1978-1998 (P. Heppner, et al., the authors ) is a survey of the state of the art in counseling psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Relation of self-efficacy expectations to academic achievement and persistence.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the relation of self-efficacy beliefs to subjects' persistence and success in pursuing science and engineering college majors and found that subjects reporting high selfefficacy for educational requirements generally achieved higher grades and persisted longer in technical/scientific majors over the following year than those with low selfefficacies.