https://staff.blog.ui.ac.id/hsuryadi/files/2012/02/ROS_RNS.pdf

Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are key signaling molecules that play an important role in the progression of inflammatory disorders. An enhanced ROS generation by polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) at the site of inflammation causes endothelial dysfunction and tissue injury. The vascular endothelium plays an important role in passage of macromolecules and inflammatory cells from the blood to tissue. Under the inflammatory conditions, oxidative stress produced by PMNs leads to the opening of inter-endothelial junctions and promotes the migration of inflammatory cells across the endothelial barrier. The migrated inflammatory cells not only help in the clearance of pathogens and foreign particles but also lead to tissue injury. The current review compiles the past and current research in the area of inflammation with particular emphasis on oxidative stress-mediated signaling mechanisms that are involved in inflammation and tissue injury.

Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Tissue Injury

Free radicals and other reactive species (RS) are thought to play an important role in many human diseases. Establishing their precise role requires the ability to measure them and the oxidative damage that they cause.


This article first reviews what is meant by the terms free radical, RS, antioxidant, oxidative damage and oxidative stress.


It then critically examines methods used to trap RS, including spin trapping and aromatic hydroxylation, with a particular emphasis on those methods applicable to human studies.


Methods used to measure oxidative damage to DNA, lipids and proteins and methods used to detect RS in cell culture, especially the various fluorescent ‘probes' of RS, are also critically reviewed.


The emphasis throughout is on the caution that is needed in applying these methods in view of possible errors and artifacts in interpreting the results.





Keywords: Cell culture, free radical, reactive species, antioxidant, oxidative stress, oxidative damage, fluorescent probe, lipid peroxidation, superoxide


Introduction
Free radicals and other ‘reactive oxygen (ROS)/nitrogen/chlorine species' (for an explanation of these terms see Table 1) are widely believed to contribute to the development of several age-related diseases, and perhaps, even to the aging process itself (Halliwell & Gutteridge, 1999; Sohal et al., 2002) by causing ‘oxidative stress' and ‘oxidative damage' (terms explained in Table 2). For example, many studies have shown increased oxidative damage to all the major classes of biomolecules in the brains of Alzheimer's patients (Halliwell, 2001; Butterfield, 2002; Liu et al., 2003). Other diseases in which oxidative damage has been implicated include cancer, atherosclerosis, other neurodegenerative diseases and diabetes (Hagen et al., 1994; Chowienczyk et al., 2000; Halliwell, 2000a, 2001, 2002a, 2002b; Parthasarathy et al., 2000). If oxidative damage contributes significantly to disease pathology (Table 3 lists the criteria needed to establish this), then actions that decrease it should be therapeutically beneficial (Halliwell, 2001; Lee et al., 2002a; Liu et al., 2003). If the oxidative damage is involved in the origin of a disease, then successful antioxidant treatment should delay or prevent the onset of that disease (Halliwell, 1991, 2002a, 2002b; Galli et al., 2002; Steinberg & Witztum, 2002). To establish the role of oxidative damage (Table 3), it is therefore essential to be able to measure it accurately. For example, the failure of interventions with antioxidants such as vitamin E, β-carotene or ascorbate to decrease disease incidence in several human intervention trials may have simply been due to the failure of these compounds to decrease oxidative damage in the subjects tested (Halliwell, 1999a, 2000c; Levine et al., 2001; Meagher et al., 2001). In this review, we will examine the methods available to measure reactive species (RS) and oxidative damage, with a particular emphasis on those applicable to human studies.



Table 1

Nomenclature of reactive species





Table 2

Some key definitions





Table 3

Criteria for implicating RS as a significant mechanism of tissue injury in human disease




Measuring RS in vivo: basic principles

Some fascinating techniques such as L-band electron spin resonance (ESR) with nitroxyl probes and magnetic resonance imaging spin trapping are under development to measure RS directly in whole animals (e.g. Berliner et al., 2001; Han et al., 2001; Utsumi & Yamada, 2003), but no probes are currently suitable for human use. Most RS persist for only a short time in vivo and cannot be measured directly. There are a few exceptions: examples include H2O2 (discussed below), and perhaps, NO•, in the sense that serum levels of NO2− have been claimed to measure vascular endothelial NO• synthesis (Kelm et al., 1999), despite the fact that NO2− is quickly oxidized to NO3− in vivo (Kelm et al., 1999; Oldreive & Rice-Evans, 2001). Essentially, there are two approaches to detecting transient RS: 


attempting to trap these species and measure the levels of the trapped molecules and


measuring the levels of the damage done by RS, that is, the amount of oxidative damage.




Sometimes other approaches are used. They include measurements of erythrocyte antioxidant defences and of total antioxidant activity of body fluids; falls in these parameters are often taken as evidence of oxidative stress. Erythrocytes cannot synthesize proteins, however, and their antioxidant enzyme levels may drop as they ‘age' in the circulation (Denton et al., 1975). Thus changes in their levels are more likely to reflect changes in the rates of red blood cell turnover: if this slows down, the circulating erythrocytes will be older on average and so levels of antioxidant enzymes in them will appear to fall. Vice versa, if an intervention accelerates red cell removal or increases erythropoiesis, levels of antioxidants in red cells will seem to rise. Hence, such data should be interpreted with caution.

Depending on the method that is used to measure it, the plasma or serum ‘total antioxidant capacity' (TAC) usually involves major contributions from urate, ascorbate and sometimes albumin −SH groups (Benzie & Strain, 1996; Halliwell & Gutteridge, 1999; Prior & Cao, 1999; Rice-Evans, 2000; Bartosz, 2003), although different methods measure different things (Schlesier et al., 2002; Bartosz, 2003). Thus, for example, if plasma albumin levels fall, TAC will fall. If urate levels rise, TAC will rise. The multiple changes in blood chemistry that occur in sick people mean that TAC changes should be interpreted with caution. TAC is also influenced by diet, often because consumption of certain foods may produce changes in plasma ascorbate and/or urate levels (Halliwell, 2003b).

/pdf/measuring-reactive-species-and-oxidative-damage-in-vivo-and-5a9iiwcjlt.pdf

Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture: how should you do it and what do the results mean?

Protein carbonyl groups as biomarkers of oxidative stress.

Free radicals and other oxidants have gained importance in the field of biology due to their central role in various physiological conditions as well as their implication in a diverse range of diseases. The free radicals, both the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), are derived from both endogenous sources (mitochondria, peroxisomes, endoplasmic reticulum, phagocytic cells etc.) and exogenous sources (pollution, alcohol, tobacco smoke, heavy metals, transition metals, industrial solvents, pesticides, certain drugs like halothane, paracetamol, and radiation). Free radicals can adversely affect various important classes of biological molecules such as nucleic acids, lipids, and proteins, thereby altering the normal redox status leading to increased oxidative stress. The free radicals induced oxidative stress has been reported to be involved in several diseased conditions such as diabetes mellitus, neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson’s disease-PD, Alzheimer’s disease-AD and Multiple sclerosis-MS), cardiovascular diseases (atherosclerosis and hypertension), respiratory diseases (asthma), cataract development, rheumatoid arthritis and in various cancers (colorectal, prostate, breast, lung, bladder cancers). This review deals with chemistry, formation and sources, and molecular targets of free radicals and it provides a brief overview on the pathogenesis of various diseased conditions caused by ROS/RNS.

/pdf/free-radicals-properties-sources-targets-and-their-4af1hv9bf7.pdf

Free Radicals: Properties, Sources, Targets, and Their Implication in Various Diseases

https://www.cell.com/trends/molecular-medicine/pdf/S1471-4914(03)00031-5.pdf

Protein carbonylation in human diseases.

Carbonylation of proteins is an irreversible oxidative damage, often leading to a loss of protein function, which is considered a widespread indicator of severe oxidative damage and disease-derived protein dysfunction. Whereas moderately carbonylated proteins are degraded by the proteasomal system, heavily carbonylated proteins tend to form high-molecular-weight aggregates that are resistant to degradation and accumulate as damaged or unfolded proteins. Such aggregates of carbonylated proteins can inhibit proteasome activity. A large number of neurodegenerative diseases are directly associated with the accumulation of proteolysis-resistant aggregates of carbonylated proteins in tissues. Identification of specific carbonylated protein(s) functionally impaired and development of selective carbonyl blockers should lead to the definitive assessment of the causative, correlative or consequential role of protein carbonylation in disease onset and/or progression, possibly providing new therapeutic aproaches.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2006.tb00407.x

Protein carbonylation, cellular dysfunction, and disease progression

S-glutathionylation in protein redox regulation.

I.	Introduction	00	
 II.	Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species	00	
 III.	Biological Markers of Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress	00	
 IV.	Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress and Protein Modifications	00	
 	A.  Oxidative/Nitrosative Modification of Protein Thiols	00	
 	B.  Oxidative/Nitrosative Modification of Tyrosine	00	
 	C.  Oxidative Modification of Methionine	00	
 	D.  Protein Carbonylation	00	
 	E.  Oxidative Modification of Histidine and Tryptophan	00	
  V.	MS Approaches for the Molecular Characterization of Oxidatively/Nitrosatively Modified Proteins	00	
 	A.  Analysis of Oxidized/Nitrosated Products of Protein Thiols	00	
 	B.  Analysis of Oxidized/Nitrated Products of Tyrosine Residues	00	
 	C.  Analysis of Oxidized Products of Methionine Residues	00	
 	D.  Analysis of Protein Carbonylation Products	00	
 	E.  Analysis of Oxidized Products of Tryptophan Residues	00	
 	F.  Analysis of Oxidized Products of Histidine Residues	00	
  VI.	Proteomic Strategies for the Identification of ROS/RNS Targets in Complex Protein Mixtures	00	
 VII.	Selected Human Diseases Associated with Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress	00	
 	A.  Acute (Adult) Respiratory Distress Syndrome	00	
 	B.  Alzheimer's Disease	00	
 	C.  Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis	00	
 	D.  Asthma	00	
 	E.  Atherosclerosis	00	
 	F.  Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases	00	
 	G.  Diabetes Mellitus	00	
 	H.  HIV Infection	00	
 	I.  Preeclampsia	00	
 	J.  Rheumatoid Arthritis	00	
 	K.  Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies	00	
 VIII.	Oxidatively Modified Proteins in Human Diseases	00	
  IX.	Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives	00	
Acknowledgments	00	
Abbreviations	00	
References	00	




Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) contribute to the pathogenesis and/or progression of several human diseases. Proteins are important molecular signposts of oxidative/nitrosative damage. However, it is generally unresolved whether the presence of oxidatively/nitrosatively modified proteins has a causal role or simply reflects secondary epiphenomena. Only direct identification and characterization of the modified protein(s) in a given pathophysiological condition can decipher the potential roles played by ROS/RNS-induced protein modifications. During the last few years, mass spectrometry (MS)-based technologies have contributed in a significant way to foster a better understanding of disease processes. The study of oxidative/nitrosative modifications, investigated by redox proteomics, is contributing to establish a relationship between pathological hallmarks of disease and protein structural and functional abnormalities. MS-based technologies promise a contribution in a new era of molecular medicine, especially in the discovery of diagnostic biomarkers of oxidative/nitrosative stress, enabling early detection of diseases. Indeed, identification and characterization of oxidatively/nitrosatively modified proteins in human diseases has just begun. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev

Roberto Colombo

Papers

Protein carbonyl groups as biomarkers of oxidative stress.

Protein carbonylation in human diseases.

Protein carbonylation, cellular dysfunction, and disease progression

S-glutathionylation in protein redox regulation.

Proteins as biomarkers of oxidative/nitrosative stress in diseases: The contribution of redox proteomics