scispace - formally typeset
S

Stefan J. Kiebel

Researcher at Dresden University of Technology

Publications -  174
Citations -  20223

Stefan J. Kiebel is an academic researcher from Dresden University of Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Inference & Bayesian inference. The author has an hindex of 68, co-authored 166 publications receiving 18302 citations. Previous affiliations of Stefan J. Kiebel include University College London & Max Planck Society.

Papers
More filters
Book

Statistical Parametric Mapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images

TL;DR: In an age where the amount of data collected from brain imaging is increasing constantly, it is of critical importance to analyse those data within an accepted framework to ensure proper integration and comparison of the information collected as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predictive coding under the free-energy principle.

TL;DR: This paper considers prediction and perceptual categorization as an inference problem that is solved by the brain, whose hierarchical and dynamical structure enables simulated brains to recognize and predict trajectories or sequences of sensory states.
Journal ArticleDOI

Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: applications.

TL;DR: A series of models that exemplify the diversity of problems that can be addressed within the empirical Bayesian framework are presented, using PET data to show how priors can be derived from the between-voxel distribution of activations over the brain.
Journal ArticleDOI

Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory.

TL;DR: The procedures used in conventional data analysis are formulated in terms of hierarchical linear models and a connection between classical inference and parametric empirical Bayes (PEB) through covariance component estimation is established through covariances component estimation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation

TL;DR: The free-energy formulation may provide an alternative perspective on the motor control that places it in an intimate relationship with perception, and can explain why adaptive behavior emerges in biological agents and suggests a simple alternative to optimal control theory.