Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format
Recent searches

Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format Example of Evidence-Based Mental Health format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Evidence-Based Mental Health — Template for authors

Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Psychiatry and Mental Health #30 of 502 up up by 205 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 111 Published Papers | 957 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 02/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.7
SJR: 0.858
SNIP: 1.482
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.0
SJR: 0.704
SNIP: 0.929
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 6.1
SJR: 1.333
SNIP: 1.061
open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 2.8
SJR: 0.763
SNIP: 1.156

Journal Performance & Insights

CiteRatio

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

8.6

69% from 2019

CiteRatio for Evidence-Based Mental Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 8.6
2019 5.1
2018 3.0
2017 2.3
2016 1.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.282

79% from 2019

SJR for Evidence-Based Mental Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.282
2019 1.273
2018 0.739
2017 0.839
2016 0.417
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.856

155% from 2019

SNIP for Evidence-Based Mental Health from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.856
2019 1.121
2018 0.633
2017 0.537
2016 0.482
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 69% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 79% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 155% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Evidence-Based Mental Health

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

BMJ Publishing Group

Evidence-Based Mental Health

Evidence-Based Mental Health aims to engage psychiatrists and psychologists, particularly younger professionals, in the challenge of basing their practice on evidence. It aims to provide material to allow professionals to develop the necessary skills, such that after reading t...... Read More

Psychiatry and Mental health

Medicine

i
Last updated on
02 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
1362-0347
i
Impact Factor
Low - 0.108
i
Open Access
Yes
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
unsrt
i
Citation Type
Numbered
[25]
i
Bibliography Example
C. W. J. Beenakker. Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97(6):067007, 2006.

Top papers written in this journal

open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EBMENTAL-2019-300117
How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial
Sara Balduzzi1, Gerta Rücker1, Guido Schwarzer1

Abstract:

Objective Meta-analysis is of fundamental importance to obtain an unbiased assessment of the available evidence. In general, the use of meta-analysis has been increasing over the last three decades with mental health as a major research topic. It is then essential to well understand its methodology and interpret its results. ... Objective Meta-analysis is of fundamental importance to obtain an unbiased assessment of the available evidence. In general, the use of meta-analysis has been increasing over the last three decades with mental health as a major research topic. It is then essential to well understand its methodology and interpret its results. In this publication, we describe how to perform a meta-analysis with the freely available statistical software environment R, using a working example taken from the field of mental health. Methods R package meta is used to conduct standard meta-analysis. Sensitivity analyses for missing binary outcome data and potential selection bias are conducted with R package metasens. All essential R commands are provided and clearly described to conduct and report analyses. Results The working example considers a binary outcome: we show how to conduct a fixed effect and random effects meta-analysis and subgroup analysis, produce a forest and funnel plot and to test and adjust for funnel plot asymmetry. All these steps work similar for other outcome types. Conclusions R represents a powerful and flexible tool to conduct meta-analyses. This publication gives a brief glimpse into the topic and provides directions to more advanced meta-analysis methods available in R. read more read less

Topics:

Funnel plot (60%)60% related to the paper
View PDF
2,021 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EBMH.1.3.70
The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health
Christopher H. Evans1, Frank Margison2, Michael Barkham3

Abstract:

Where outcomes are unequivocal (life or death; being able to walk v being paralysed) clinicians, researchers, and patients find it easy to speak the same language in evaluating results. However, in much of mental health work initial states and outcomes of treatments are measured on continuous scales and the distribution of th... Where outcomes are unequivocal (life or death; being able to walk v being paralysed) clinicians, researchers, and patients find it easy to speak the same language in evaluating results. However, in much of mental health work initial states and outcomes of treatments are measured on continuous scales and the distribution of the “normal” often overlaps with the range of the “abnormal.” In this situation, clinicians and researchers often talk different languages about change data, and both are probably poor at conveying their thoughts to patients. Researchers traditionally compare means between groups. Their statistical methods, using distributions of the scores before and after treatment to suggest whether change is a sampling artefact or a chance finding, have been known for many years.1 By contrast, clinicians are more often concerned with changes in particular individuals they are treating and often dichotomise outcome as “success” or “failure.” The number needed to treat (NNT) method of presenting results has gone some way to bridge this gap but often uses arbitrary criteria on which to dichotomise change into “success” and “failure.” A typical example is the criterion of a 50% drop on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score. A method bridging these approaches would assist the translation of research results into clinical practice. Jacobson et al proposed a method of determining reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC) that summarises changes at the level of the individual in the context of observed changes for the whole sample.2, 3–5 Their methods are applicable, in one form or another, to the measurement of change on any continuous scale for any clinical problem, although they have been reported primarily in the psychotherapy research literature. The broad concept of reliable and clinically significant change rests on 2 questions being addressed at the level of each … read more read less

Topics:

Evidence-based practice (50%)50% related to the paper, Context (language use) (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
418 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EB-2018-102891
Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.

Abstract:

The potential of smartphone apps to improve quality and increase access to mental health care is increasingly clear. Yet even in the current global mental health crisis, real-world uptake of smartphone apps by clinics or consumers remains low. To understand this dichotomy, this paper reviews current challenges surrounding use... The potential of smartphone apps to improve quality and increase access to mental health care is increasingly clear. Yet even in the current global mental health crisis, real-world uptake of smartphone apps by clinics or consumers remains low. To understand this dichotomy, this paper reviews current challenges surrounding user engagement with mental health smartphone apps. While smartphone engagement metrics and reporting remains heterogeneous in the literature, focusing on themes offers a framework to identify underlying trends. These themes suggest that apps are not designed with service users in mind, do not solve problems users care most about, do not respect privacy, are not seen as trustworthy and are unhelpful in emergencies. Respecting these current issues surrounding mental health app engagement, we propose several solutions and highlight successful examples of mental health apps with high engagement. Further research is necessary to better characterise engagement with mental health apps and identify best practices for design, testing and implementation. read more read less

Topics:

Global mental health (63%)63% related to the paper, Mental health (55%)55% related to the paper, Psychological intervention (54%)54% related to the paper
388 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EBMH.1.2.37
Guidelines for evaluating prevalence studies
Michael H. Boyle1

Abstract:

As stated in the first issue of Evidence-Based Mental Health, we are planning to widen the scope of the journal to include studies answering additional types of clinical questions. One of our first priorities has been to develop criteria for studies providing information about the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, both in ... As stated in the first issue of Evidence-Based Mental Health, we are planning to widen the scope of the journal to include studies answering additional types of clinical questions. One of our first priorities has been to develop criteria for studies providing information about the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, both in the population and in specific clinical settings. We invited the following editorial from Dr Michael Boyle to highlight the key methodological issues involved in the critical appraisal of prevalence studies. The next stage is to develop valid and reliable criteria for selecting prevalence studies for inclusion in the journal. We welcome our readers contribution to this process. You are a geriatric psychiatrist providing consultation and care to elderly residents living in several nursing homes. The previous 3 patients referred to you have met criteria for depression, and you are beginning to wonder if the prevalence of this disorder is high enough to warrant screening. Alternatively, you are a child youth worker on a clinical service for disruptive behaviour disorders. It seems that all of the children being treated by the team come from economically disadvantaged families. Rather than treating these children on a case by case basis, the team has discussed developing an experimental community initiative in a low income area of the city. You are beginning to wonder if the prevalence of disruptive behaviour disorders is high enough in poor areas to justify such a programme. Prevalence studies of psychiatric disorder take a sample of respondents to estimate the frequency and distribution of these conditions in larger groups. All of these studies involve sampling, cross sectional assessments of disorder, the collection of ancillary information, and data analysis. Interest in prevalence may extend from a particular clinical setting (a narrow focus) to an entire nation (a broad focus). In … read more read less

Topics:

Population (52%)52% related to the paper, Critical appraisal (51%)51% related to the paper, Mental health (50%)50% related to the paper
View PDF
286 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1136/EBMENTAL-2018-300014
Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews

Abstract:

Objective Evidence syntheses such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide a rigorous and transparent knowledge base for translating clinical research into decisions, and thus they represent the basic unit of knowledge in medicine. Umbrella reviews are reviews of previously published systematic reviews or meta-analyses... Objective Evidence syntheses such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide a rigorous and transparent knowledge base for translating clinical research into decisions, and thus they represent the basic unit of knowledge in medicine. Umbrella reviews are reviews of previously published systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Therefore, they represent one of the highest levels of evidence synthesis currently available, and are becoming increasingly influential in biomedical literature. However, practical guidance on how to conduct umbrella reviews is relatively limited. Methods We present a critical educational review of published umbrella reviews, focusing on the essential practical steps required to produce robust umbrella reviews in the medical field. Results The current manuscript discusses 10 key points to consider for conducting robust umbrella reviews. The points are: ensure that the umbrella review is really needed, prespecify the protocol, clearly define the variables of interest, estimate a common effect size, report the heterogeneity and potential biases, perform a stratification of the evidence, conduct sensitivity analyses, report transparent results, use appropriate software and acknowledge the limitations. We illustrate these points through recent examples from umbrella reviews and suggest specific practical recommendations. Conclusions The current manuscript provides a practical guidance for conducting umbrella reviews in medical areas. Researchers, clinicians and policy makers might use the key points illustrated here to inform the planning, conduction and reporting of umbrella reviews in medicine. read more read less

Topics:

Systematic review (53%)53% related to the paper
View PDF
252 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Evidence-Based Mental Health.

It automatically formats your research paper to BMJ Publishing Group formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Evidence-Based Mental Health format uses unsrt citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Evidence-Based Mental Health in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Evidence-Based Mental Health guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Evidence-Based Mental Health guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Evidence-Based Mental Health guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Evidence-Based Mental Health?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Evidence-Based Mental Health citation style.

4. Can I use the Evidence-Based Mental Health templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Evidence-Based Mental Health.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Evidence-Based Mental Health that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Evidence-Based Mental Health that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Evidence-Based Mental Health?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Evidence-Based Mental Health.

7. Where can I find the template for the Evidence-Based Mental Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Evidence-Based Mental Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Evidence-Based Mental Health's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Evidence-Based Mental Health an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Evidence-Based Mental Health is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Evidence-Based Mental Health?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Evidence-Based Mental Health?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Evidence-Based Mental Health?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Evidence-Based Mental Health, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Evidence-Based Mental Health's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Evidence-Based Mental Health?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Evidence-Based Mental Health. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Evidence-Based Mental Health?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Evidence-Based Mental Health are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Evidence-Based Mental Health?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Evidence-Based Mental Health's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Evidence-Based Mental Health in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Evidence-Based Mental Health Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Evidence-Based Mental Health formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template