Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format
Recent searches

Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format Example of Review of Public Personnel Administration format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Review of Public Personnel Administration — Template for authors

Publisher: SAGE
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Public Administration #13 of 165 up up by 11 ranks
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management #21 of 200 up up by 11 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 101 Published Papers | 581 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 11/07/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access

SAGE

Quality:  
Good
CiteRatio: 2.5
SJR: 0.78
SNIP: 1.479
open access Open Access

Inderscience Publishers

Quality:  
Medium
CiteRatio: 0.9
SJR: 0.232
SNIP: 0.923
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.2
SJR: 0.798
SNIP: 1.518
open access Open Access

Taylor and Francis

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 5.7
SJR: 1.643
SNIP: 1.771

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.837

0% from 2018

Impact factor for Review of Public Personnel Administration from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 2.837
2018 2.825
2017 2.444
2016 1.474
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

5.8

12% from 2019

CiteRatio for Review of Public Personnel Administration from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 5.8
2019 5.2
2018 4.3
2017 3.6
2016 2.9
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has increased by 0% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 12% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

2.32

8% from 2019

SJR for Review of Public Personnel Administration from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.32
2019 2.151
2018 1.98
2017 1.225
2016 1.076
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

2.629

6% from 2019

SNIP for Review of Public Personnel Administration from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 2.629
2019 2.809
2018 1.422
2017 1.622
2016 1.023
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has increased by 8% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has decreased by 6% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.
Review of Public Personnel Administration

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

SAGE

Review of Public Personnel Administration

Review of Public Personnel Administration (ROPPA), peer-reviewed and published quarterly, presents timely, rigorous scholarship on human resource management in public service organizations. Scholars and professionals will find articles covering both traditional and emerging to...... Read More

Public Administration

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
10 Jul 2020
i
ISSN
0734-371X
i
Impact Factor
High - 1.08
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SageV
i
Citation Type
Numbered (Superscripted)
25
i
Bibliography Example
Blonder GE, Tinkham M and Klapwijk TM. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 1982; 25(7): 4515–4532. URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515.

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0734371X9901900402
Working for America: Does Public Service Motivation Make a Difference?
Katherine C. Naff1, John Crum

Abstract:

Considerable research has asked whether public sector employees have different values and respond to different incen tives than private sector employees Recently, Jim Perry developed a scale design... Considerable research has asked whether public sector employees have different values and respond to different incen tives than private sector employees Recently, Jim Perry developed a scale design... read more read less

Topics:

Public sector (71%)71% related to the paper, Public service motivation (63%)63% related to the paper, Private sector (61%)61% related to the paper
552 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0734371X07307149
Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees?:
Leonard Bright1

Abstract:

Public service motivation (PSM) is argued to be a meaningful predictor of the performance of employees in public organizations. Many scholars predict that as the level of PSM increases, the performance of public employees will also increase. Unfortunately, existing research has yet to fully support this hypothesis. Two publis... Public service motivation (PSM) is argued to be a meaningful predictor of the performance of employees in public organizations. Many scholars predict that as the level of PSM increases, the performance of public employees will also increase. Unfortunately, existing research has yet to fully support this hypothesis. Two published studies that tested this hypothesis have come to different conclusions. This study investigated whether Person—Organization Fit (P—O Fit) mediates the relationship between PSM and the self-reported performance of public employees, using structural equation modeling. Using a sample of 205 public employees randomly drawn from three public organizations, this study found that PSM had no significant direct impact on the performance of public employees, when P—O Fit was taken into account. The implications of this study and areas of future research are discussed. read more read less

Topics:

Public service motivation (65%)65% related to the paper, Job performance (57%)57% related to the paper, Structural equation modeling (51%)51% related to the paper
326 Citations
open accessOpen access Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0734371X17698189
We Know the Yin—But Where Is the Yang? Toward a Balanced Approach on Common Source Bias in Public Administration Scholarship
Bert George1, Sanjay K. Pandey2

Abstract:

Surveys have long been a dominant instrument for data collection in public administration. However, it has become widely accepted in the last decade that the usage of a self-reported instrument to measure both the independent and dependent variables results in common source bias (CSB). In turn, CSB is argued to inflate correl... Surveys have long been a dominant instrument for data collection in public administration. However, it has become widely accepted in the last decade that the usage of a self-reported instrument to measure both the independent and dependent variables results in common source bias (CSB). In turn, CSB is argued to inflate correlations between variables, resulting in biased findings. Subsequently, a narrow blinkered approach on the usage of surveys as single data source has emerged. In this article, we argue that this approach has resulted in an unbalanced perspective on CSB. We argue that claims on CSB are exaggerated, draw upon selective evidence, and project what should be tentative inferences as certainty over large domains of inquiry. We also discuss the perceptual nature of some variables and measurement validity concerns in using archival data. In conclusion, we present a flowchart that public administration scholars can use to analyze CSB concerns. read more read less
View PDF
270 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0734371X04271526
Red Tape and Public Service Motivation: Findings from a National Survey of Managers in State Health and Human Services Agencies
Patrick G. Scott1, Sanjay K. Pandey2

Abstract:

This article examines the relationship between red tape and public-service motivation. Using a recent national survey of public managers in various state health and human service organizations, the... This article examines the relationship between red tape and public-service motivation. Using a recent national survey of public managers in various state health and human service organizations, the... read more read less

Topics:

Public service motivation (67%)67% related to the paper, Human services (58%)58% related to the paper, Bureaucracy (51%)51% related to the paper
216 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1177/0734371X06296866
Antecedents, Mediators, and Consequences of Affective, Normative, and Continuance Commitment: Empirical Tests of Commitment Effects in Federal Agencies
Sung Min Park1, Hal G. Rainey1

Abstract:

This study examines the constructs and the effects of three subdimensions of federal employees' organizational commitment—affective, normative, and continuance. Using the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) 2000 survey instrument and employing an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, multivariate regression, and a s... This study examines the constructs and the effects of three subdimensions of federal employees' organizational commitment—affective, normative, and continuance. Using the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) 2000 survey instrument and employing an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, multivariate regression, and a structural equation model, the authors empirically test and measure (a) the dimensionality of the three commitment constructs, (b) how and to what extent antecedent variables would affect the three different commitment variables—affective, normative, and continuance— and (c) how these three commitment values differently influence several outcome variables. The authors confirm that there are three distinctive constructs of commitment to stay in federal agencies and that transformation-oriented leadership (TOL), empowerment, goal clarity, public service—oriented motivation (PSOM), procedural equity perceptions, and objective appraisal systems have direct and indirect effects on the commi... read more read less

Topics:

Organizational commitment (59%)59% related to the paper, Continuance (54%)54% related to the paper, Structural equation modeling (52%)52% related to the paper, Confirmatory factor analysis (50%)50% related to the paper
216 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Review of Public Personnel Administration.

It automatically formats your research paper to SAGE formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Review of Public Personnel Administration format uses SageV citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Review of Public Personnel Administration in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Review of Public Personnel Administration guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Review of Public Personnel Administration guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Review of Public Personnel Administration guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Review of Public Personnel Administration?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Review of Public Personnel Administration citation style.

4. Can I use the Review of Public Personnel Administration templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Review of Public Personnel Administration.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Review of Public Personnel Administration that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Review of Public Personnel Administration that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Review of Public Personnel Administration?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Review of Public Personnel Administration.

7. Where can I find the template for the Review of Public Personnel Administration?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Review of Public Personnel Administration's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Review of Public Personnel Administration's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Review of Public Personnel Administration an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Review of Public Personnel Administration is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Review of Public Personnel Administration?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Review of Public Personnel Administration?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Review of Public Personnel Administration?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Review of Public Personnel Administration, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Review of Public Personnel Administration's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Review of Public Personnel Administration?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Review of Public Personnel Administration. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Review of Public Personnel Administration?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Review of Public Personnel Administration are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Review of Public Personnel Administration?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Review of Public Personnel Administration's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Review of Public Personnel Administration in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Review of Public Personnel Administration Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Review of Public Personnel Administration formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template