Example of European Journal of Applied Physiology format

Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace

This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.

Open Access

European Journal of Applied Physiology — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer

Your data will always be in your control. Learn more

Get started with a free account

— or sign up using email —

See how it works

Guideline source

Categories	Rank	Trend in last 3 yrs
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health	#86 of 526	down by 10 ranks
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine	#44 of 262	down by 3 ranks
Physiology (medical)	#38 of 98	up by 4 ranks

Journal quality:

High

Last 4 years overview: 912 Published Papers | 4389 Citations

Indexed in: Scopus

Last updated: 20/06/2020

Related journals

Insights

General info

Related Journals

Open Access

Recommended

Journal of Physiological Anthropology

Springer

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 3.7

SJR: 0.724

SNIP: 1.069

Open Access

Recommended

Translational Research

Elsevier

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 12.3

SJR: 2.179

SNIP: 1.521

Open Access

Recommended

Sport, Education and Society

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 5.3

SJR: 1.287

SNIP: 2.109

Open Access

Temperature

Taylor and Francis

Quality:

High

CiteRatio: 6.2

SJR: 0.981

SNIP: 1.447

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

2.58

16% from 2018

Impact factor for European Journal of Applied Physiology from 2016 - 2019
Year	Value
2019	2.58
2018	3.055
2017	2.401
2016	2.13

Graph view

4.8

2% from 2019

CiteRatio for European Journal of Applied Physiology from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	4.8
2019	4.9
2018	4.5
2017	4.2
2016	4.5

Graph view

Insights

Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 16% in last year.
This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

CiteRatio of this journal has decreased by 2% in last years.
This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

1.05

7% from 2019

SJR for European Journal of Applied Physiology from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	1.05
2019	1.134
2018	1.263
2017	1.186
2016	1.055

Graph view

1.188

11% from 2019

SNIP for European Journal of Applied Physiology from 2016 - 2020
Year	Value
2020	1.188
2019	1.339
2018	1.43
2017	1.215
2016	1.126

Graph view

Insights

SJR of this journal has decreased by 7% in last years.
This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

Insights

SNIP of this journal has decreased by 11% in last years.
This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

European Journal of Applied Physiology

The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, neuroscience and nutrition. EJAP accepts papers that address different levels of investigation extending from molecular and cellular through to large-system, and which may include genomics, proteomics and "in silico" modelling and simulation perspectives. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology. Read Less

Medicine

Last updated on	20 Jun 2020
ISSN	1439-6319
Impact Factor	High - 1.297
Acceptance Rate	40%
Open Access	No
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy	Green
Plagiarism Check	Available via Turnitin
Endnote Style	Download Available
Bibliography Name	SPBASIC
Citation Type	Author Year (Blonder et al, 1982)
Bibliography Example	Blonder GE, Tinkham M, Klapwijk TM (1982) Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys Rev B 25(7):4515–4532, URL 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1007/BF00422166 •

A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping.

Carmelo Bosco¹, Pekka Luhtanen¹, •

01 Jan 1983 - European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract:

A simple test for the measurement of mechanical power during a vertical rebound jump series has been devised. The test consists of measuring the flight time with a digital timer (+/- 0.001 s) and counting the number of jumps performed during a certain period of time (e.g., 15-60 s). Formulae for calculation of mechanical powe... A simple test for the measurement of mechanical power during a vertical rebound jump series has been devised. The test consists of measuring the flight time with a digital timer (+/- 0.001 s) and counting the number of jumps performed during a certain period of time (e.g., 15-60 s). Formulae for calculation of mechanical power from the measured parameters were derived. The relationship between this mechanical power and a modification of the Wingate test (r = 0.87, n = 12 males) and 60 m dash (r = 0.84, n = 12 males) were very close. The mechanical power in a 60 s jumping test demonstrated higher values (20 W X kgBW-1) than the power in a modified (60 s) Wingate test (7 W X kgBW-1) and a Margaria test (14 W X kgBW-1). The estimated powers demonstrated different values because both bicycle riding and the Margaria test reflect primarily chemo-mechanical conversion during muscle contraction, whereas in the jumping test elastic energy is also utilized. Therefore the new jumping test seems suitable to evaluate the power output of leg extensor muscles during natural motion. Because of its high reproducibility (r = 0.95) and simplicity, the test is suitable for laboratory and field conditions. read more

Topics:

Wingate test (56%)56% related to the paper, Jumping (55%)55% related to the paper

1,361 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1007/BF00428958 •

A maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test to predict VO2 max

Luc Léger¹, Jean Lambert¹ •

01 Jan 1982 - European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract:

In order to validate a maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test for the prediction of $$\dot V$$ O2 max, 91 adults (32 females and 59 males, aged 27.3±9.2 and 24.8±5.5 year respectively and with mean $$\dot V$$ O2 max (± SD) of 39.3±8.3 and 51.6±7.8 ml·kg−1·min−1 respectively) performed the test and had $$\dot V$$ O2... In order to validate a maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test for the prediction of $$\dot V$$ O2 max, 91 adults (32 females and 59 males, aged 27.3±9.2 and 24.8±5.5 year respectively and with mean $$\dot V$$ O2 max (± SD) of 39.3±8.3 and 51.6±7.8 ml·kg−1·min−1 respectively) performed the test and had $$\dot V$$ O2 max estimated by the retroextrapolation method (extrapolation to time zero of recovery of the exponential least squares regression of the first four 20-s recovery $$\dot V$$ O2 values). Starting at 8 km·h−1 and increasing by 0.5 km·h−1 every 2 min, the 20-m shuttle run test enabled prediction of the $$\dot V$$ O2 max (y, ml·kg−1·min−1) from the maximal speed (x, km·h−1) by means of the following regression equation: y=5.857x — 19.458; r=0.84 and SEE=5.4. Later, the multistage protocol was slightly modified to its final version, in which the test started at stage 7 Met and continued with a 1 Met (3.5 ml O2·kg−1·min−1) increment every 2 min. Twenty-five of the 91 subjects performed the 20-m shuttle test twice, once on a hard, low-friction surface (vinyl-asbestos tiles) and another time on a rubber floor, as well as a walking maximal multistage test on an inclined treadmill. There was no difference between the means of these tests or between the slopes of the $$\dot V$$ O2max — maximal speed regressions for the two types of surfaces. The 20-m shuttle run test and another maximal multistage field test involving continuous track running gave comparable results (r=0.92, SEE=2.6 ml O2·kg−1·min−1, n=70). Finally, test and retest of the 20-m shuttle run test also yielded comparable results (r=0.975, SEE=2.0 ml O2·kg−1·min−1, n=50). It is concluded that the 20-m shuttle run test is a valid and reliable test for the prediction of the $$\dot V$$ O2 max of male and female adults, individually or in groups, on most gymnasium surfaces. read more

View PDF

1,030 Citations

Journal Article • DOI: 10.1007/S00421-002-0681-6 •

Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones.

Gerson E. R. Campos¹, Thomas J Luecke¹, •

15 Aug 2002 - European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract:

Thirty-two untrained men [mean (SD) age 22.5 (5.8) years, height 178.3 (7.2) cm, body mass 77.8 (11.9) kg] participated in an 8-week progressive resistance-training program to investigate the "strength–endurance continuum". Subjects were divided into four groups: a low repetition group (Low Rep, n=9) performing 3–5 repetition... Thirty-two untrained men [mean (SD) age 22.5 (5.8) years, height 178.3 (7.2) cm, body mass 77.8 (11.9) kg] participated in an 8-week progressive resistance-training program to investigate the "strength–endurance continuum". Subjects were divided into four groups: a low repetition group (Low Rep, n=9) performing 3–5 repetitions maximum (RM) for four sets of each exercise with 3 min rest between sets and exercises, an intermediate repetition group (Int Rep, n=11) performing 9–11 RM for three sets with 2 min rest, a high repetition group (High Rep, n=7) performing 20–28 RM for two sets with 1 min rest, and a non-exercising control group (Con, n=5). Three exercises (leg press, squat, and knee extension) were performed 2 days/week for the first 4 weeks and 3 days/week for the final 4 weeks. Maximal strength [one repetition maximum, 1RM), local muscular endurance (maximal number of repetitions performed with 60% of 1RM), and various cardiorespiratory parameters (e.g., maximum oxygen consumption, pulmonary ventilation, maximal aerobic power, time to exhaustion) were assessed at the beginning and end of the study. In addition, pre- and post-training muscle biopsy samples were analyzed for fiber-type composition, cross-sectional area, myosin heavy chain (MHC) content, and capillarization. Maximal strength improved significantly more for the Low Rep group compared to the other training groups, and the maximal number of repetitions at 60% 1RM improved the most for the High Rep group. In addition, maximal aerobic power and time to exhaustion significantly increased at the end of the study for only the High Rep group. All three major fiber types (types I, IIA, and IIB) hypertrophied for the Low Rep and Int Rep groups, whereas no significant increases were demonstrated for either the High Rep or Con groups. However, the percentage of type IIB fibers decreased, with a concomitant increase in IIAB fibers for all three resistance-trained groups. These fiber-type conversions were supported by a significant decrease in MHCIIb accompanied by a significant increase in MHCIIa. No significant changes in fiber-type composition were found in the control samples. Although all three training regimens resulted in similar fiber-type transformations (IIB to IIA), the low to intermediate repetition resistance-training programs induced a greater hypertrophic effect compared to the high repetition regimen. The High Rep group, however, appeared better adapted for submaximal, prolonged contractions, with significant increases after training in aerobic power and time to exhaustion. Thus, low and intermediate RM training appears to induce similar muscular adaptations, at least after short-term training in previously untrained subjects. Overall, however, these data demonstrate that both physical performance and the associated physiological adaptations are linked to the intensity and number of repetitions performed, and thus lend support to the "strength–endurance continuum". read more

Topics:

One-repetition maximum (57%)57% related to the paper

1,008 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1007/BF00235103 •

Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics.

A. E. J. Miller¹, J. D. MacDougall¹, •

01 Jan 1993 - European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract:

Strength and muscle characteristics were examined in biceps brachii and vastus lateralis of eight men and eight women. Measurements included motor unit number, size and activation and voluntary strength of the elbow flexors and knee extensors. Fiber areas and type were determined from needle biopsies and muscle areas by compu... Strength and muscle characteristics were examined in biceps brachii and vastus lateralis of eight men and eight women. Measurements included motor unit number, size and activation and voluntary strength of the elbow flexors and knee extensors. Fiber areas and type were determined from needle biopsies and muscle areas by computerized tomographical scanning. The women were approximately 52% and 66% as strong as the men in the upper and lower body respectively. The men were also stronger relative to lean body mass. A significant correlation was found between strength and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA; P≤0.05). The women had 45, 41, 30 and 25% smaller muscle CSAs for the biceps brachii, total elbow flexors, vastus lateralis and total knee extensors respectively. The men had significantly larger type I fiber areas (4597 vs 3483 μm2) and mean fiber areas (6632 vs 3963 μm2) than the women in biceps brachii and significantly larger type II fiber areas (7700 vs 4040 μm2) and mean fiber areas (7070 vs 4290 μm2) in vastus lateralis. No significant gender difference was found in the strength to CSA ratio for elbow flexion or knee extension, in biceps fiber number (180 620 in men vs 156 872 in women), muscle area to fiber area ratio in the vastus lateralis 451 468 vs 465 007) or any motor unit characteristics. Data suggest that the greater strength of the men was due primarily to larger fibers. The greater gender difference in upper body strength can probably be attributed to the fact that women tend to have a lower proportion of their lean tissue distributed in the upper body. It is difficult to determine the extent to which the larger fibers in men represent a true biological difference rather that a difference in physical activity, but these data suggest that it is largely an innate gender difference. read more

Topics:

Biceps (54%)54% related to the paper, Lean body mass (50%)50% related to the paper

View PDF

889 Citations

Open access • Journal Article • DOI: 10.1007/S00421-016-3346-6 •

Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations

Nicola A. Maffiuletti, Per Aagaard¹, •

03 Mar 2016 - European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract:

The evaluation of rate of force development during rapid contractions has recently become quite popular for characterising explosive strength of athletes, elderly individuals and patients. The main aims of this narrative review are to describe the neuromuscular determinants of rate of force development and to discuss various ... The evaluation of rate of force development during rapid contractions has recently become quite popular for characterising explosive strength of athletes, elderly individuals and patients. The main aims of this narrative review are to describe the neuromuscular determinants of rate of force development and to discuss various methodological considerations inherent to its evaluation for research and clinical purposes. Rate of force development (1) seems to be mainly determined by the capacity to produce maximal voluntary activation in the early phase of an explosive contraction (first 50–75 ms), particularly as a result of increased motor unit discharge rate; (2) can be improved by both explosive-type and heavy-resistance strength training in different subject populations, mainly through an improvement in rapid muscle activation; (3) is quite difficult to evaluate in a valid and reliable way. Therefore, we provide evidence-based practical recommendations for rational quantification of rate of force development in both laboratory and clinical settings. read more

View PDF

791 Citations

Also popular among researchers

“

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds

Choose a template

Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates

Import a MS-Word file or start fresh

It takes only few seconds to import

View and edit your final output

SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines

Submit directly or Download

Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for European Journal of Applied Physiology.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

Easy support from all your favorite tools

European Journal of Applied Physiology format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write European Journal of Applied Physiology in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the European Journal of Applied Physiology guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the European Journal of Applied Physiology guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the European Journal of Applied Physiology guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in European Journal of Applied Physiology?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the European Journal of Applied Physiology citation style.

4. Can I use the European Journal of Applied Physiology templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for European Journal of Applied Physiology.

5. Can I use a manuscript in European Journal of Applied Physiology that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper European Journal of Applied Physiology that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in European Journal of Applied Physiology?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in European Journal of Applied Physiology.

7. Where can I find the template for the European Journal of Applied Physiology?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per European Journal of Applied Physiology's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the European Journal of Applied Physiology's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. European Journal of Applied Physiology an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's European Journal of Applied Physiology is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like European Journal of Applied Physiology?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like European Journal of Applied Physiology?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using European Journal of Applied Physiology?

After writing your paper autoformatting in European Journal of Applied Physiology, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is European Journal of Applied Physiology's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for European Journal of Applied Physiology?

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for European Journal of Applied Physiology. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour	Archiving policy
Green	Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue	Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow	Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White	Archiving not formally supported

FYI:

Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In European Journal of Applied Physiology?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for European Journal of Applied Physiology are:.

S. No.	Citation Style Type
1.	Author Year
2.	Numbered
3.	Numbered (Superscripted)
4.	Author Year (Cited Pages)
5.	Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the European Journal of Applied Physiology?

16. Can I download European Journal of Applied Physiology in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in European Journal of Applied Physiology Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to European Journal of Applied Physiology formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

“

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

”

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user

European Journal of Applied Physiology — Template for authors

Related Journals

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

2.58

4.8

Insights

Insights

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

1.05

1.188

Insights

Insights

European Journal of Applied Physiology

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Top papers written in this journal

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

Topics:

Abstract:

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

Freedom from formatting guidelines

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Frequently asked questions

Fast and reliable, built for complaince.

No word template required

Verifed journal formats

Trusted by academicians

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.