Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format
Recent searches

Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
Look Inside
Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format Example of Group Decision and Negotiation format
Sample paper formatted on SciSpace - SciSpace
This content is only for preview purposes. The original open access content can be found here.
open access Open Access

Group Decision and Negotiation — Template for authors

Publisher: Springer
Categories Rank Trend in last 3 yrs
Social Sciences (all) #28 of 260 down down by 6 ranks
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) #46 of 306 up up by 10 ranks
Strategy and Management #111 of 440 down down by 37 ranks
Management of Technology and Innovation #67 of 248 down down by 23 ranks
Decision Sciences (all) #14 of 37 down down by 3 ranks
journal-quality-icon Journal quality:
High
calendar-icon Last 4 years overview: 186 Published Papers | 762 Citations
indexed-in-icon Indexed in: Scopus
last-updated-icon Last updated: 13/06/2020
Related journals
Insights
General info
Top papers
Popular templates
Get started guide
Why choose from SciSpace
FAQ

Related Journals

open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 7.1
SJR: 2.91
SNIP: 2.992
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

SAGE

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 13.7
SJR: 5.901
SNIP: 4.172
open access Open Access
recommended Recommended

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 20.8
SJR: 4.475
SNIP: 5.548
open access Open Access

Wiley

Quality:  
High
CiteRatio: 3.9
SJR: 1.136
SNIP: 1.221

Journal Performance & Insights

Impact Factor

CiteRatio

Determines the importance of a journal by taking a measure of frequency with which the average article in a journal has been cited in a particular year.

A measure of average citations received per peer-reviewed paper published in the journal.

1.612

20% from 2018

Impact factor for Group Decision and Negotiation from 2016 - 2019
Year Value
2019 1.612
2018 2.01
2017 1.869
2016 1.688
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

4.1

5% from 2019

CiteRatio for Group Decision and Negotiation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 4.1
2019 3.9
2018 4.1
2017 3.5
2016 4.2
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • Impact factor of this journal has decreased by 20% in last year.
  • This journal’s impact factor is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • CiteRatio of this journal has increased by 5% in last years.
  • This journal’s CiteRatio is in the top 10 percentile category.

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

Measures weighted citations received by the journal. Citation weighting depends on the categories and prestige of the citing journal.

Measures actual citations received relative to citations expected for the journal's category.

0.503

13% from 2019

SJR for Group Decision and Negotiation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 0.503
2019 0.577
2018 0.797
2017 0.551
2016 1.018
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

1.076

15% from 2019

SNIP for Group Decision and Negotiation from 2016 - 2020
Year Value
2020 1.076
2019 0.939
2018 1.061
2017 1.188
2016 1.265
graph view Graph view
table view Table view

insights Insights

  • SJR of this journal has decreased by 13% in last years.
  • This journal’s SJR is in the top 10 percentile category.

insights Insights

  • SNIP of this journal has increased by 15% in last years.
  • This journal’s SNIP is in the top 10 percentile category.

Group Decision and Negotiation

Guideline source: View

All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. All product names, trademarks and registered trademarks are property of their respective owners.

Use of these names, trademarks and brands does not imply endorsement or affiliation. Disclaimer Notice

Springer

Group Decision and Negotiation

The idea underlying the journal, Group Decision and Negotiation, emerges from evolving, unifying approaches to group decision and negotiation processes. These processes are complex and self-organizing involving multiplayer, multicriteria, ill-structured, evolving, dynamic prob...... Read More

Social Sciences

i
Last updated on
12 Jun 2020
i
ISSN
0926-2644
i
Impact Factor
Medium - 0.741
i
Open Access
No
i
Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy
Green faq
i
Plagiarism Check
Available via Turnitin
i
Endnote Style
Download Available
i
Bibliography Name
SPBASIC
i
Citation Type
Author Year
(Blonder et al, 1982)
i
Bibliography Example
Beenakker CWJ (2006) Specular andreev reflection in graphene. Phys Rev Lett 97(6):067,007, URL 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067007

Top papers written in this journal

Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1022232410606
A Classification Scheme for Negotiation in Electronic Commerce
Alessio Lomuscio1, Michael Wooldridge2, Nicholas R. Jennings3

Abstract:

In the last few years we have witnessed a surge of business-to-consumer and business-to-business commerce operated on the Internet. However many of these systems are often nothing more than electronic catalogues on which the user can choose a product which is made available for a fixed price. This modus operandi is clearly fa... In the last few years we have witnessed a surge of business-to-consumer and business-to-business commerce operated on the Internet. However many of these systems are often nothing more than electronic catalogues on which the user can choose a product which is made available for a fixed price. This modus operandi is clearly failing to exploit the full potential of electronic commerce. Against this background, we argue here that in the next few years we will see a new generation of systems emerge, based on automatic negotiation. In this paper we identify the main parameters on which any automatic negotiation depends. This classification schema is then used to categorise the subsequent papers in this book that focus on automatic negotiation. read more read less

Topics:

Negotiation (53%)53% related to the paper, Information system (50%)50% related to the paper
515 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011944.62889.6F
Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communication
Lina Zhou1, Judee K. Burgoon2, Jay F. Nunamaker2, Doug Twitchell2

Abstract:

The detection of deception is a promising but challenging task. A systematic discussion of automated Linguistics Based Cues (LBC) to deception has rarely been touched before. The experiment studied the effectiveness of automated LBC in the context of text-based asynchronous computer mediated communication (TA-CMC). Twentyseve... The detection of deception is a promising but challenging task. A systematic discussion of automated Linguistics Based Cues (LBC) to deception has rarely been touched before. The experiment studied the effectiveness of automated LBC in the context of text-based asynchronous computer mediated communication (TA-CMC). Twentyseven cues either extracted from the prior research or created for this study were clustered into nine linguistics constructs: quantity, diversity, complexity, specificity, expressivity, informality, affect, uncertainty, and nonimmediacy. A test of the selected LBC in a simulated TA-CMC experiment showed that: (1) a systematic analysis of linguistic information could be useful in the detection of deception; (2) some existing LBC were effective as expected, while some others turned out in the opposite direction to the prediction of the prior research; and (3) some newly discovered linguistic constructs and their component LBC were helpful in differentiating deception from truth. read more read less

Topics:

Deception (55%)55% related to the paper
View PDF
416 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1007/S10726-011-9261-7
Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making
Meimei Xia1, Zeshui Xu1, Na Chen1

Abstract:

Hesitancy is the most common problem in decision making, for which hesitant fuzzy set can be considered as a suitable means allowing several possible degrees for an element to a set. In this paper, we study the aggregation of the hesitancy fuzzy information. Several series of aggregation operators are proposed and the connect... Hesitancy is the most common problem in decision making, for which hesitant fuzzy set can be considered as a suitable means allowing several possible degrees for an element to a set. In this paper, we study the aggregation of the hesitancy fuzzy information. Several series of aggregation operators are proposed and the connections of them are discussed. To reflect the correlation of the aggregation arguments, two methods are proposed to determine the aggregation weight vectors. Based on the support degrees among aggregation arguments, the weight vector of decision makers are obtained more objectively. To deal with the correlation of criteria, we apply the Choquet integral to get the weights of criteria. A method is also proposed for group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment. read more read less

Topics:

Fuzzy set (56%)56% related to the paper, Fuzzy logic (55%)55% related to the paper, Choquet integral (54%)54% related to the paper, Group decision-making (53%)53% related to the paper
406 Citations
Journal Article DOI: 10.1023/A:1023325406946
Cracks in Diversity Research: The Effects of Diversity Faultlines on Conflict and Performance
Sherry M. B. Thatcher1, Karen A. Jehn2, Elaine Zanutto2

Abstract:

In this quasi-field study, we investigate the effects of diversity faultlines on the conflict experience, performance, and morale of 79 groups. This is one of the first studies to operationalize the construct of diversity-related faultlines (Lau and Murnighan 1998). One of the most important contributions of this research is ... In this quasi-field study, we investigate the effects of diversity faultlines on the conflict experience, performance, and morale of 79 groups. This is one of the first studies to operationalize the construct of diversity-related faultlines (Lau and Murnighan 1998). One of the most important contributions of this research is that faultlines incorporate multiple characteristics of group members simultaneously rather than assessing just one demographic characteristic at a time as most past diversity research has done. We develop a measure to capture the complexity of the faultline construct and to examine the effects of various group diversity faultline profiles on group outcomes. Linear results with a limited range of data show that faultlines are negatively related to conflict and positively related to morale and performance. Supplemental analyses that take into account the unique characteristics of our dataset indicate curvilinear relationships between diversity faultlines and relationship conflict, process conflict, group morale, and group performance. Groups with either virtually no faultlines (very diverse members) or strong faultlines (split into 2 fairly homogeneous subgroups) had higher levels of conflict and lower levels of morale and performance than groups with medium faultlines. The results suggest a more complex relationship between diversity and group process and outcome variables than typically described in diversity research. A detailed discussion of the faultline measure we developed and the methodological issues associated with measuring and interpreting faultlines are reported. read more read less
392 Citations
Author Pic

SciSpace is a very innovative solution to the formatting problem and existing providers, such as Mendeley or Word did not really evolve in recent years.

- Andreas Frutiger, Researcher, ETH Zurich, Institute for Biomedical Engineering

Get MS-Word and LaTeX output to any Journal within seconds
1
Choose a template
Select a template from a library of 40,000+ templates
2
Import a MS-Word file or start fresh
It takes only few seconds to import
3
View and edit your final output
SciSpace will automatically format your output to meet journal guidelines
4
Submit directly or Download
Submit to journal directly or Download in PDF, MS Word or LaTeX

(Before submission check for plagiarism via Turnitin)

clock Less than 3 minutes

What to expect from SciSpace?

Speed and accuracy over MS Word

''

With SciSpace, you do not need a word template for Group Decision and Negotiation.

It automatically formats your research paper to Springer formatting guidelines and citation style.

You can download a submission ready research paper in pdf, LaTeX and docx formats.

Time comparison

Time taken to format a paper and Compliance with guidelines

Plagiarism Reports via Turnitin

SciSpace has partnered with Turnitin, the leading provider of Plagiarism Check software.

Using this service, researchers can compare submissions against more than 170 million scholarly articles, a database of 70+ billion current and archived web pages. How Turnitin Integration works?

Turnitin Stats
Publisher Logos

Freedom from formatting guidelines

One editor, 100K journal formats – world's largest collection of journal templates

With such a huge verified library, what you need is already there.

publisher-logos

Easy support from all your favorite tools

Group Decision and Negotiation format uses SPBASIC citation style.

Automatically format and order your citations and bibliography in a click.

SciSpace allows imports from all reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Google Scholar etc.

Frequently asked questions

1. Can I write Group Decision and Negotiation in LaTeX?

Absolutely not! Our tool has been designed to help you focus on writing. You can write your entire paper as per the Group Decision and Negotiation guidelines and auto format it.

2. Do you follow the Group Decision and Negotiation guidelines?

Yes, the template is compliant with the Group Decision and Negotiation guidelines. Our experts at SciSpace ensure that. If there are any changes to the journal's guidelines, we'll change our algorithm accordingly.

3. Can I cite my article in multiple styles in Group Decision and Negotiation?

Of course! We support all the top citation styles, such as APA style, MLA style, Vancouver style, Harvard style, and Chicago style. For example, when you write your paper and hit autoformat, our system will automatically update your article as per the Group Decision and Negotiation citation style.

4. Can I use the Group Decision and Negotiation templates for free?

Sign up for our free trial, and you'll be able to use all our features for seven days. You'll see how helpful they are and how inexpensive they are compared to other options, Especially for Group Decision and Negotiation.

5. Can I use a manuscript in Group Decision and Negotiation that I have written in MS Word?

Yes. You can choose the right template, copy-paste the contents from the word document, and click on auto-format. Once you're done, you'll have a publish-ready paper Group Decision and Negotiation that you can download at the end.

6. How long does it usually take you to format my papers in Group Decision and Negotiation?

It only takes a matter of seconds to edit your manuscript. Besides that, our intuitive editor saves you from writing and formatting it in Group Decision and Negotiation.

7. Where can I find the template for the Group Decision and Negotiation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Group Decision and Negotiation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

8. Can I reformat my paper to fit the Group Decision and Negotiation's guidelines?

Of course! You can do this using our intuitive editor. It's very easy. If you need help, our support team is always ready to assist you.

9. Group Decision and Negotiation an online tool or is there a desktop version?

SciSpace's Group Decision and Negotiation is currently available as an online tool. We're developing a desktop version, too. You can request (or upvote) any features that you think would be helpful for you and other researchers in the "feature request" section of your account once you've signed up with us.

10. I cannot find my template in your gallery. Can you create it for me like Group Decision and Negotiation?

Sure. You can request any template and we'll have it setup within a few days. You can find the request box in Journal Gallery on the right side bar under the heading, "Couldn't find the format you were looking for like Group Decision and Negotiation?”

11. What is the output that I would get after using Group Decision and Negotiation?

After writing your paper autoformatting in Group Decision and Negotiation, you can download it in multiple formats, viz., PDF, Docx, and LaTeX.

12. Is Group Decision and Negotiation's impact factor high enough that I should try publishing my article there?

To be honest, the answer is no. The impact factor is one of the many elements that determine the quality of a journal. Few of these factors include review board, rejection rates, frequency of inclusion in indexes, and Eigenfactor. You need to assess all these factors before you make your final call.

13. What is Sherpa RoMEO Archiving Policy for Group Decision and Negotiation?

SHERPA/RoMEO Database

We extracted this data from Sherpa Romeo to help researchers understand the access level of this journal in accordance with the Sherpa Romeo Archiving Policy for Group Decision and Negotiation. The table below indicates the level of access a journal has as per Sherpa Romeo's archiving policy.

RoMEO Colour Archiving policy
Green Can archive pre-print and post-print or publisher's version/PDF
Blue Can archive post-print (ie final draft post-refereeing) or publisher's version/PDF
Yellow Can archive pre-print (ie pre-refereeing)
White Archiving not formally supported
FYI:
  1. Pre-prints as being the version of the paper before peer review and
  2. Post-prints as being the version of the paper after peer-review, with revisions having been made.

14. What are the most common citation types In Group Decision and Negotiation?

The 5 most common citation types in order of usage for Group Decision and Negotiation are:.

S. No. Citation Style Type
1. Author Year
2. Numbered
3. Numbered (Superscripted)
4. Author Year (Cited Pages)
5. Footnote

15. How do I submit my article to the Group Decision and Negotiation?

It is possible to find the Word template for any journal on Google. However, why use a template when you can write your entire manuscript on SciSpace , auto format it as per Group Decision and Negotiation's guidelines and download the same in Word, PDF and LaTeX formats? Give us a try!.

16. Can I download Group Decision and Negotiation in Endnote format?

Yes, SciSpace provides this functionality. After signing up, you would need to import your existing references from Word or Bib file to SciSpace. Then SciSpace would allow you to download your references in Group Decision and Negotiation Endnote style according to Elsevier guidelines.

Fast and reliable,
built for complaince.

Instant formatting to 100% publisher guidelines on - SciSpace.

Available only on desktops 🖥

No word template required

Typset automatically formats your research paper to Group Decision and Negotiation formatting guidelines and citation style.

Verifed journal formats

One editor, 100K journal formats.
With the largest collection of verified journal formats, what you need is already there.

Trusted by academicians

I spent hours with MS word for reformatting. It was frustrating - plain and simple. With SciSpace, I can draft my manuscripts and once it is finished I can just submit. In case, I have to submit to another journal it is really just a button click instead of an afternoon of reformatting.

Andreas Frutiger
Researcher & Ex MS Word user
Use this template